CoolBreeze44 wrote:AbeVigodaLive wrote:CoolBreeze44 wrote:If he hasn't seen Wiggins shut down opposing stars, he hasn't been watching very closely. It's happened time and time again,.
Fair enough. Can you share some examples? Also... what are your thoughts on the advanced stats indicating that Wiggins is not even an average defender? Is it only because of the relative lack of steals and blocks? Are there areas he can improve?
Not being facetious... I'm intrigued by the Wiggins is a good defender argument. I see moments of that, too... but is it because those are more memorable? Or, because I WANT to see them so badly?
Abe, you know me. I'm not going to go back and scour box scores looking for evidence. My take is simply from watching the games and focusing on Wiggins (which I do quite a bit). Off the top of my head you might want to look at the games against Wade and Harden. But it's my viewpoint that Andrew is extremely good at keeping his man in front of him and limiting scoring opportunities.
Not sure about the advanced stats argument. I'm sure steals are a part of it, and he clearly needs to rebound better. He seems to play a little conservatively on D, I'd like to see just a little bit of CoBrew in him and see him take some gambles with that athleticism. I've made the point before regarding his stamina, I just don't think he has his grown man lungs and legs yet. He seems to labor quite a bit out on the court, and it appears to affect everything from his rebounding to his free throw shooting. I'd hope this next offseason is spent on shooting and conditioning. If he can come back a more conditioned athlete with a better shooting stroke, we could really have something special.
And you know me. You knew I couldn't resist sneaking a peek.
vs. Wade this season:
18 ppg / 5.0 reb / 3.0 ast / 50% fg
- one good game... one bad game for Wade. Season averages: 19 / 4 / 5 / 46% fg
vs. Harden (last season):
31.3 ppg / 5.8 reb / 8.5 ast / 44.3% fg
Harden vs. everybody else: 27.4 ppg / 6.1 reb / 6.9 ast / 44.0% fg
I know there's a ton of noise in those figures... for example, how much was Wiggins guarding them. How much did they score vs. him. Et al.
But both guys produced near / at / or above their season averages. That's what intrigues me. Wiggins looks the part. And we can all point to specific examples on specific plays. Or, even sometimes games. But when it's all added up... the stats don't show the same things most of us are seeing.
Is that on the team? Scheme? Wiggins? Fluke? Or, some combination of all of it? Or does he really need to improve more on both ends of the court than we might think?