Camden wrote:Q12543 wrote:Camden wrote:To clarify, I brought up a LaVine for Noel trade earlier in the thread with the question of "who says no" to it. That's the right now deal that is most possible for both sides, but I wasn't pushing that exact deal super hard. Wait til this summer and the better trade for us, and perhaps the Sixers, is our top-five pick for Noel. THAT deal does interest me very much.
We know it interests you as well as many of us. But the real question is whether it interests the Sixers. I doubt it.
They have to move somebody. You can't hold on to Noel, Okafor, Embiid and Saric. At some point, they have to move assets to help in other areas. The only two players that teams would pay something of value for right now is Noel and Okafor. Have to think they want to build around Okafor, no?
Not sure if they are convinced that Okafor is a "build around" type of talent. But he almost forces you to build around him because he's not of much use unless he gets a bunch of touches in the low post. It would be very much an old-fashioned inside-out post-centric offense. It's not that it can't be effective, but it seems easier to figure out for modern day defenses than a pace & space or flow type offense.
Noel on the other hand seems more like a modern-day defensive big man who can guard multiple positions, hedge hard on PnR, block shots, get steals - all the stuff that we'd want on the Wolves. I'm pretty sure Philly loves that stuff too.
So I think they are much more likely to try and move Okafor vs. Noel. Or may be they just keep rolling with both for another year before making a move.