The Minnesota Timberwolves will reportedly show interest in signing Bradley Beal once his contract buyout is finalized
(via: @JakeLFischer)
Would love this.
Bradley Beal
Re: Bradley Beal
That would be a huge get for Minnesota. Beal still has a lot left in the tank, and paired with Edwards and Towns, that’s a legit offensive trio. The big question is whether the Wolves can offer him a clear role and playoff upside — he’s not looking to rebuild again. If they can make the cap work post-buyout, I’m all for it. Would also bring some veteran poise in tight games via buy boosting service https://askboosters.com/.
Last edited by Winorlose on Thu Jul 31, 2025 9:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
AussieWolf3
- Posts: 1571
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2025 5:11 pm
Re: Bradley Beal
Interesting. I won't lie, it crossed my mind as a good idea if he's bought out, but I also know a vanishingly small amount about Beal's game.
What would he offer the Wolves, and at what price is that worth it?
My understanding is that he's not much of a PG, nor a good defender (disappointing, considering his measurables), but he would be another ball handler and 2nd side scorer.
What would he offer the Wolves, and at what price is that worth it?
My understanding is that he's not much of a PG, nor a good defender (disappointing, considering his measurables), but he would be another ball handler and 2nd side scorer.
-
AussieWolf3
- Posts: 1571
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2025 5:11 pm
Re: Bradley Beal
Towns?Winorlose wrote: ↑Mon Jul 07, 2025 1:52 pm That would be a huge get for Minnesota. Beal still has a lot left in the tank, and paired with Edwards and Towns, that’s a legit offensive trio. The big question is whether the Wolves can offer him a clear role and playoff upside — he’s not looking to rebuild again. If they can make the cap work post-buyout, I’m all for it. Would also bring some veteran poise in tight games.
Re: Bradley Beal
lol, The heat is affecting me badly todayAussieWolf3 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 07, 2025 1:56 pmTowns?Winorlose wrote: ↑Mon Jul 07, 2025 1:52 pm That would be a huge get for Minnesota. Beal still has a lot left in the tank, and paired with Edwards and Towns, that’s a legit offensive trio. The big question is whether the Wolves can offer him a clear role and playoff upside — he’s not looking to rebuild again. If they can make the cap work post-buyout, I’m all for it. Would also bring some veteran poise in tight games.
Right, fair point — Towns isn’t even on the roster anymore since the Knicks trade. That actually makes the idea of adding Beal even more intriguing. With Ant as the clear #1 and Gobert anchoring the defense, Beal could slide in as a secondary scorer and veteran closer. The spacing might even improve without KAT clogging things inside. If they can make the finances work post-buyout, this could be one of the smarter late-offseason moves. By the way, I’ve been using the linebet app to keep up with all these trade rumors and odds — super handy for checking lines on the go.
Last edited by Winorlose on Wed Jul 09, 2025 6:06 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
AussieWolf3
- Posts: 1571
- Joined: Thu May 29, 2025 5:11 pm
Re: Bradley Beal
As I said above, I don't know Beal's game all that much, however consensus opinion is not all that kind to him. I suspect that has more to do with his contract than his actual game, but either way, who is in place of? Is he off the bench, or is he in place of Randle?Winorlose wrote: ↑Mon Jul 07, 2025 2:01 pmlol, The heat is affecting me badly todayAussieWolf3 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 07, 2025 1:56 pmTowns?Winorlose wrote: ↑Mon Jul 07, 2025 1:52 pm That would be a huge get for Minnesota. Beal still has a lot left in the tank, and paired with Edwards and Towns, that’s a legit offensive trio. The big question is whether the Wolves can offer him a clear role and playoff upside — he’s not looking to rebuild again. If they can make the cap work post-buyout, I’m all for it. Would also bring some veteran poise in tight games.![]()
Right, fair point — Towns isn’t even on the roster anymore since the Knicks trade. That actually makes the idea of adding Beal even more intriguing. With Ant as the clear #1 and Gobert anchoring the defense, Beal could slide in as a secondary scorer and veteran closer. The spacing might even improve without KAT clogging things inside. If they can make the finances work post-buyout, this could be one of the smarter late-offseason moves.
Re: Bradley Beal
I think he'd probably be in more of a sixth-man or secondary scorer role rather than replacing Randle outright. At this stage of his career, Beal seems better suited to giving the offense another reliable option when Ant is off the floor.AussieWolf3 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 07, 2025 2:08 pmAs I said above, I don't know Beal's game all that much, however consensus opinion is not all that kind to him. I suspect that has more to do with his contract than his actual game, but either way, who is in place of? Is he off the bench, or is he in place of Randle?Winorlose wrote: ↑Mon Jul 07, 2025 2:01 pmlol, The heat is affecting me badly today![]()
Right, fair point — Towns isn’t even on the roster anymore since the Knicks trade. That actually makes the idea of adding Beal even more intriguing. With Ant as the clear #1 and Gobert anchoring the defense, Beal could slide in as a secondary scorer and veteran closer. The spacing might even improve without KAT clogging things inside. If they can make the finances work post-buyout, this could be one of the smarter late-offseason moves.
A lot depends on the contract situation too. The perception around Beal reminds me a bit of how people focus on bonus features rather than the overall value in other industries kind of like how players chase free spins in scatter pays slots while overlooking the rest of the game. With Beal, the contract has often overshadowed what he can still contribute on the court.
If the price is right, I could see him being a useful addition, but I wouldn't want to sacrifice too much depth to get him.
Last edited by Winorlose on Tue Jun 23, 2026 7:11 am, edited 2 times in total.
- Coolbreeze44
- Posts: 14394
- Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Bradley Beal
I'm a fan, but another ball handler is my preference.
Re: Bradley Beal
Without having watched Beal much the last couple years here is the what I can tell you.
He is a pretty efficient player and he has some pretty good assist numbers over the years. I don't view him as a bad guy that would create problems on a roster. The other issue is he has problems staying healthy. I'd guess he is still a starting level player or at worst a really good six man. Whatever team is getting him would be getting a pretty nice player for the money. If the Wolves didn't call and make a case for themselves what are they even doing with their lives? I'm not getting my hopes up.
He is a pretty efficient player and he has some pretty good assist numbers over the years. I don't view him as a bad guy that would create problems on a roster. The other issue is he has problems staying healthy. I'd guess he is still a starting level player or at worst a really good six man. Whatever team is getting him would be getting a pretty nice player for the money. If the Wolves didn't call and make a case for themselves what are they even doing with their lives? I'm not getting my hopes up.
Re: Bradley Beal
So, does than mean Beal would start at PG for the Wolves?
Beal has missed an awful lot of games the past 5 or 6 years. Other than TC going big game hunting, I don't see a great fit for Beal in Minnesota. And I am not sure Beal would feel a great attraction for Minnesota.
I really don't see much momentum here.
Beal has missed an awful lot of games the past 5 or 6 years. Other than TC going big game hunting, I don't see a great fit for Beal in Minnesota. And I am not sure Beal would feel a great attraction for Minnesota.
I really don't see much momentum here.