Boston basically built a team around Jalen Brown dumping guys to save salary and weren't supposed to be very good. They might figure they can do it again around Tatum and Giannis. They would be a team with some opportunity so they might get some guys willing to go there cheap. I mean would Simons go back there on a cheap one year deal? What would I give up for White? Idk one issue about him and a reason why the Celtics might be willing to move him is he is owed over 98 million the next 3 years. If he returns to his play before this year that's fine but what if he doesn't? If we are talking about trading Randle and a couple 2nd or something then sure. I'd guess the Celtics would only be trading him to get some real assets to the Bucks or they will just keep him.Phenom wrote: ↑Thu Jun 11, 2026 5:16 pmI'm guessing White will be retained since they wouldn't need his salary to match Giannis. If they are willing to trade him at that point, I'd steer clear.rapsuperstar31 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 11, 2026 4:54 pm [O’Connor] The Boston Celtics are actively making calls and shopping everyone not named Jayson Tatum. Boston is “in” on Giannis Antetokounmpo and they are making a real push to acquire him.
If you think White can turn it around next season, you can always check in on him.
Wolves offseason outlook.
Re: Wolves offseason outlook.
- Coolbreeze44
- Posts: 14330
- Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Wolves offseason outlook.
Hearing there may be some Suggs momentum building for the Wolves. This is a good thing.
Re: Wolves offseason outlook.
It’s websites all of a sudden aggregating something Jon K mentioned 2 weeks agoCoolbreeze44 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 13, 2026 1:30 pm Hearing there may be some Suggs momentum building for the Wolves. This is a good thing.
Re: Wolves offseason outlook.
I would love it, but I wonder if you are referring to comments Jon K made a week ago. He's the only one I have heard mention Suggs to the Wolves and of course the internet ran with it. But today Jon clarified that he tweeted about Suggs just as a "thought exercise". I don't see Orlando wanting Randle to back up Paolo at PF either. But I agree Suggs would be a terrific addition.Coolbreeze44 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 13, 2026 1:30 pm Hearing there may be some Suggs momentum building for the Wolves. This is a good thing.
Edit: yeah, what kek said...
- Coolbreeze44
- Posts: 14330
- Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am
Re: Wolves offseason outlook.
I'm first referring to comments I made before John K did. And maybe you're right, people are picking up on what he said.FNG wrote: ↑Sat Jun 13, 2026 1:44 pmI would love it, but I wonder if you are referring to comments Jon K made a week ago. He's the only one I have heard mention Suggs to the Wolves and of course the internet ran with it. But today Jon clarified that he tweeted about Suggs just as a "thought exercise". I don't see Orlando wanting Randle to back up Paolo at PF either. But I agree Suggs would be a terrific addition.Coolbreeze44 wrote: ↑Sat Jun 13, 2026 1:30 pm Hearing there may be some Suggs momentum building for the Wolves. This is a good thing.
Edit: yeah, what kek said...