60WinTim wrote:Camden wrote:CoolBreeze44 wrote:Camden wrote:It's probably too early to "give credit where it's due" when it's only been seven games. Nickeil Alexander-Walker is an intriguing young player, and the draft picks may or may not be meaningful down the road, but the team is still performing worse overall after the trade in terms of net rating. Let's see how the rest of the season goes and what they can turn Mike Conley Jr. into this summer or next year.
It was a fleecing my friend.
They're literally a worse team at the moment because of that trade. Perhaps give it time to see if that corrects itself.
This is simply not true. Take away KAT from last year's team and we don't make the playoffs. The team is playing .500+ ball this year without KAT.
The Timberwolves are 3-4 with a 107.8 ORtg, 111.5 DRtg, and -3.7 NetRtg in their last seven games, or since the trade was finalized.
Minnesota was 29-28 with a 112.8 ORtg, 112.6 DRtg, and +0.2 NetRtg in 57 games leading up to the trade. Those numbers are much better if you sort since January as I've talked about before.
That in-between game against Utah isn't included in either pre or post-trade sample. Minnesota would still have a negative net rating if you included it in the post-trade group of games, however.
Simply, the parading here is unjustified at this moment. It seems premature. Give it more time to see if these numbers correct themselves as time progresses. They'll receive proper credit -- or blame -- by the end of the season, I'm sure. Plenty of schedule left for us to judge.