Page 2 of 4

Re: Jokic

Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2023 2:34 pm
by kekgeek
CoolBreeze44 wrote:
kekgeek1 wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:
Carlos Danger wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:Averaging over 31 points while being a perennial All NBA defense selection. Nobody can boast anything close to that. He's also leading the team with the best record in the league. Giannis.


It's very impressive. But he's taking 6 more FGA/game than Joker plus 6 more FTA/game. Joker has been more efficient and that is reflected in the advanced stats.

You have a good point on the defense which does warrant additional consideration. But IMHO, I think it's still Joker.

Giannis plays less minutes and draws so much attention on his drives. You can't go wrong with either obviously, I hope they get to play against each other in the finals. That would solve the debate.


The nuggets are 27.6 pts better per 100 with him on then off. That is nuts.

I like Giannis more but the finals argument is invalid to me when the Bucks arguably would have 4 of the best 5 players in that series

I guess I can agree Joker has more value to his team. But IMO Giannis is the better player. I think he's the best player in the world.


I would not disagree with that.

Re: Jokic

Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2023 9:55 am
by TheFuture
CoolBreeze44 wrote:
kekgeek1 wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:
Carlos Danger wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:Averaging over 31 points while being a perennial All NBA defense selection. Nobody can boast anything close to that. He's also leading the team with the best record in the league. Giannis.


It's very impressive. But he's taking 6 more FGA/game than Joker plus 6 more FTA/game. Joker has been more efficient and that is reflected in the advanced stats.

You have a good point on the defense which does warrant additional consideration. But IMHO, I think it's still Joker.

Giannis plays less minutes and draws so much attention on his drives. You can't go wrong with either obviously, I hope they get to play against each other in the finals. That would solve the debate.


The nuggets are 27.6 pts better per 100 with him on then off. That is nuts.

I like Giannis more but the finals argument is invalid to me when the Bucks arguably would have 4 of the best 5 players in that series

I guess I can agree Joker has more value to his team. But IMO Giannis is the better player. I think he's the best player in the world.


Jokic is the best player in the world, and I don't think there is an argument against it.

Re: Jokic

Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2023 10:05 am
by Lipoli390
Great debate. I think it's a really close call between Jokic and Giannis with Embiid and Tatum battling for the 2 and 3 spots on the MVP short list. If it were just offense, then Jokic would definitely get the nod. But it gets close when you factor in the defensive prowess of Giannis.

Re: Jokic

Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2023 10:07 am
by Sundog
If I was putting a team together from scratch, I'd start with Giannis.

Re: Jokic

Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2023 10:21 am
by Lipoli390
Sundog60 wrote:If I was putting a team together from scratch, I'd start with Giannis.


So would I.

Re: Jokic

Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2023 6:38 am
by TheFuture
lipoli390 wrote:
Sundog60 wrote:If I was putting a team together from scratch, I'd start with Giannis.


So would I.


Why Giannis over Jokic?

With Jokic you are filling the center and the pg playmaking position. He can shoot. Giannis still can't. You can't defend seriously in today's NBA without being called for a foul so I don't equate Giannis' ability there to put him over the top of Jokic, who should get 3 straight MVPs. Jokic isn't a bad defender either. People just need to create a narrative. That is how ridiculously good he is.

Re: Jokic

Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2023 9:45 am
by Coolbreeze44
TheFuture wrote:
lipoli390 wrote:
Sundog60 wrote:If I was putting a team together from scratch, I'd start with Giannis.


So would I.


Why Giannis over Jokic?

With Jokic you are filling the center and the pg playmaking position. He can shoot. Giannis still can't. You can't defend seriously in today's NBA without being called for a foul so I don't equate Giannis' ability there to put him over the top of Jokic, who should get 3 straight MVPs. Jokic isn't a bad defender either. People just need to create a narrative. That is how ridiculously good he is.

No one is saying Jokic isn't great. But Giannis averages 9 points more per game and is a MUCH better defender. It's a good debate without a wrong answer.

Re: Jokic

Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2023 9:50 am
by Lipoli390
CoolBreeze44 wrote:
TheFuture wrote:
lipoli390 wrote:
Sundog60 wrote:If I was putting a team together from scratch, I'd start with Giannis.


So would I.


Why Giannis over Jokic?

With Jokic you are filling the center and the pg playmaking position. He can shoot. Giannis still can't. You can't defend seriously in today's NBA without being called for a foul so I don't equate Giannis' ability there to put him over the top of Jokic, who should get 3 straight MVPs. Jokic isn't a bad defender either. People just need to create a narrative. That is how ridiculously good he is.

No one is saying Jokic isn't great. But Giannis averages 9 points more per game and is a MUCH better defender. It's a good debate without a wrong answer.


Cool gave my answer. I love both players and would be happy to start a franchise with either one. But if forced to choose, I'd take Giannis in a fairly close call. In my mind it's Giannis and Jokic on a tier by themselves. Embiid isn't far behind, but I put him on a slightly lower tier.

Re: Jokic

Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2023 9:52 am
by Lipoli390
CoolBreeze44 wrote:
TheFuture wrote:
lipoli390 wrote:
Sundog60 wrote:If I was putting a team together from scratch, I'd start with Giannis.


So would I.


Why Giannis over Jokic?

With Jokic you are filling the center and the pg playmaking position. He can shoot. Giannis still can't. You can't defend seriously in today's NBA without being called for a foul so I don't equate Giannis' ability there to put him over the top of Jokic, who should get 3 straight MVPs. Jokic isn't a bad defender either. People just need to create a narrative. That is how ridiculously good he is.

No one is saying Jokic isn't great. But Giannis averages 9 points more per game and is a MUCH better defender. It's a good debate without a wrong answer.


Cool gave my answer. I love both players and would be happy to start a franchise with either one. But if forced to choose, I'd take Giannis in a fairly close call. In my mind it's Giannis and Jokic on a tier by themselves. Embiid isn't far behind, but I put him on a slightly lower tier.

Re: Jokic

Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2023 12:08 pm
by mjs34
Didn't want to start a thread for this - Apparently Giannis pulled a Ricky Davis.

https://twitter.com/Bucks/status/1632576321544138753?s=20