Page 2 of 3

Re: Do the Wolves have a losing record to sub .500 teams?

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2023 10:55 am
by Carlos Danger
Camden wrote:
Carlos Danger wrote:
Camden wrote:You read that blog post and didn't realize it was satire? You have to be smarter than that, respectfully.


If it's satire - he got me and I'm not smarter than that. But I read similar stuff written at the time of the meeting (finger pointing, effort questioned and DLO being part of it). So my point stands, there has been something off with this year's team. Also...just adding "respectfully" to an insult i.e. "you have to be smarter than that" doesn't actually make it respectful. If I got taken, I'll own it. But there have been plenty of things I could rip you on and have let them go (respectfully).


That wasn't an insult, but you can take it that way if you choose. It was an unserious piece of writing. Your activity here would suggest you're far more intelligent than to take that article as serious reporting. Tommy Mayonnaise? Timmy tangerine stuff? Come on now.

Colonel Mustard killed Professor Plum in the dining room with the candlestick. Bazinga!


Yep. I got taken and you are doubling down on the insults. Good for you dude. I'll eat it. But remember what you are doing here the next time you cry victim after someone (possibly me) calls out your own bullshit.

Re: Do the Wolves have a losing record to sub .500 teams?

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2023 11:09 am
by FNG
Carlos Danger wrote:
Camden wrote:
Carlos Danger wrote:
Camden wrote:You read that blog post and didn't realize it was satire? You have to be smarter than that, respectfully.


If it's satire - he got me and I'm not smarter than that. But I read similar stuff written at the time of the meeting (finger pointing, effort questioned and DLO being part of it). So my point stands, there has been something off with this year's team. Also...just adding "respectfully" to an insult i.e. "you have to be smarter than that" doesn't actually make it respectful. If I got taken, I'll own it. But there have been plenty of things I could rip you on and have let them go (respectfully).


That wasn't an insult, but you can take it that way if you choose. It was an unserious piece of writing. Your activity here would suggest you're far more intelligent than to take that article as serious reporting. Tommy Mayonnaise? Timmy tangerine stuff? Come on now.

Colonel Mustard killed Professor Plum in the dining room with the candlestick. Bazinga!


Yep. I got taken and you are doubling down on the insults. Good for you dude. I'll eat it. But remember what you are doing here the next time you cry victim after someone (possibly me) calls out your own bullshit.



Carlos, you are guilty of ignoring the old adage that has held up for years. I think it says: "Where there's smoke, there's...............nothing?" Maybe I got that wrong though...

Re: Do the Wolves have a losing record to sub .500 teams?

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2023 11:09 am
by Camden [enjin:6601484]
Carlos Danger wrote:
Camden wrote:
Carlos Danger wrote:
Camden wrote:You read that blog post and didn't realize it was satire? You have to be smarter than that, respectfully.


If it's satire - he got me and I'm not smarter than that. But I read similar stuff written at the time of the meeting (finger pointing, effort questioned and DLO being part of it). So my point stands, there has been something off with this year's team. Also...just adding "respectfully" to an insult i.e. "you have to be smarter than that" doesn't actually make it respectful. If I got taken, I'll own it. But there have been plenty of things I could rip you on and have let them go (respectfully).


That wasn't an insult, but you can take it that way if you choose. It was an unserious piece of writing. Your activity here would suggest you're far more intelligent than to take that article as serious reporting. Tommy Mayonnaise? Timmy tangerine stuff? Come on now.

Colonel Mustard killed Professor Plum in the dining room with the candlestick. Bazinga!


Yep. I got taken and you are doubling down on the insults. Good for you dude. I'll eat it. But remember what you are doing here the next time you cry victim after someone (possibly me) calls out your own bullshit.


Lighten up. These aren't insults. On the contrary, I just told you that I think you're intelligent. I only commented towards that piece because we live in an era of misinformation and the article was clearly meant to be entertaining -- and not a real behind the scenes scoop. All good. No harm done.

Also, you should absolutely call me out the next time I reference Zone Coverage. You have my blessing.

Re: Do the Wolves have a losing record to sub .500 teams?

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2023 11:26 am
by Wolvesfan21
That went downhill fast. I should have read the article myself, not that the team meeting probably went all that different! :D

I guess it's fair to ask, how would this writer know any of this stuff if it was a players only meeting? Not a big deal Carlos. DLO is gone and we will be fine. It's not like DLO was ever going to help the Wolves become a contender. He is just too big of a negative defender at his salary.

Which actually reminds me of when Mark Twain was a newspaper writer he wrote an article which to him was clearly satirical. He was astonished when everyone he talked to about it the next day believed it!

Which isn't far off at all to what we have today with the media. I wouldn't believe anything other then a car crash or weather on the local news. Most of it is satire today. lol

Re: Do the Wolves have a losing record to sub .500 teams?

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2023 1:52 pm
by Monster
This part of the article made me lol.


A source close to the situation told me that Edwards kept challenging Rivers and demanding that he say the Wolves were playing like "Really stinky doo-doo diarrhea."

"Yeah, Austin and Ant got into it for a little bit," another player (definitely) told me. "But, you know Ant, he's stubborn. When he says something he doesn't like to be misunderstood either. He kept saying that we were playing like doo-doo diarrhea and that it was really stinky. Austin didn't want to say all that."

Re: Do the Wolves have a losing record to sub .500 teams?

Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2023 4:05 pm
by Jester1534
All I have to say

Is WTF is this thread..... and why did I waste my pooping phone time to read it.

Go Wolves!

Re: Do the Wolves have a losing record to sub .500 teams?

Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2023 10:13 am
by AbeVigodaLive
"I blame D. Russell for everything wrong with the doo-doo diarrhea Timberwolves."

- Tommy Mayonnaise

Re: Do the Wolves have a losing record to sub .500 teams?

Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2023 11:16 am
by TAFKASP
This thread has been more entertaining that 75.3% of Timberwolves games!

Re: Do the Wolves have a losing record to sub .500 teams?

Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2023 5:52 pm
by Monster
AbeVigodaLive wrote:"I blame D. Russell for everything wrong with the doo-doo diarrhea Timberwolves."

- Tommy Mayonnaise


I'd trust Tommy Mayonnaise over Rodger Miraclewhip. The tangy zips in Rodger's articles are garbage. Todd Mayochup who writes for the Heinz Herald is the real deal though.

Re: Do the Wolves have a losing record to sub .500 teams?

Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2023 6:16 pm
by Camden [enjin:6601484]
monsterpile wrote:
AbeVigodaLive wrote:"I blame D. Russell for everything wrong with the doo-doo diarrhea Timberwolves."

- Tommy Mayonnaise


I'd trust Tommy Mayonnaise over Rodger Miraclewhip. The tangy zips in Rodger's articles are garbage. Todd Mayochup who writes for the Heinz Herald is the real deal though.


The Heinz Herald! The Ranch Reporter! We want all the condiments! Give us the scoops!