CoolBreeze44 wrote:I pondered this same thing today after the Twins game ended. Here's my take. I think the Twins, Wolves, and Vikings all have culture problems. And this culture undermines any real chance they have to make a title run. You can't possibly lose 18 straight playoff games without having some systemic issues. A novelist framing a fictional team with the same history as the Vikings wouldn't be believed, and wouldn't sell any books. And we all know the Wolves have the worst culture in the league, and possibly in the entire sports landscape.
The problem with the Wild is much the same as the very early Wolves teams. They were too good too early and haven't been able to escape the middle class of the league's hierarchy. But I think with the Wild there is hope. GM Bill Guerin knows things have to change, and I'm encouraged by the vigor in which he is going about it. It won't happen overnight, but I can see him building a winner within 3-4 years. Hope springs eternal.
As for culture... I agree entirely with the Wolves.
But haven't the Twins completely overhauled the way they play/manage/teach baseball? Hasn't the team gone from being the unmentioned "old school dumb guys way of playing baseball" in Moneyball to modern-day analytic devotees?
Like the Wolves, the ownership is the same, but the Pohlads seem much more hands-off with day-to-day operations. I doubt Jimbo is sitting down with Sano and Buxton and begging them to play harder before he gives them $150M.
As for the Vikings... they've had some success. And continually fall short, sometimes in heart-breaking fashion. Is it a culture thing within that organization? I dunno... maybe there are systemic culture issues with this current regime at this point.
[Note: And then KG mentioned the Gophers. Another one with almost unprecedented futility...]