Re: DLo to the Wolves
Posted: Thu Feb 06, 2020 12:33 pm
All in on the Obi Toppin bandwagon!!!!
As for Wiggins, don't let the door hit you. Wasted talent.
As for Wiggins, don't let the door hit you. Wasted talent.
Wolves fan commiserate here!
https://forum.midwestvolleyball.com/phpBB3/
https://forum.midwestvolleyball.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=26978
BloopOracle wrote:He doesn't deserve to be crowned but hopefully this slows down some of the Rosas slander
WolvesFan21 wrote:AbeVigodaLive wrote:khans2k5 wrote:BloopOracle wrote:He doesn't deserve to be crowned but hopefully this slows down some of the Rosas slander
He traded up to draft one of the worst shooters in the NBA and his team trying to push for the playoffs is pushing for a top 5 pick instead. None of it has been slander. He's been real bad so far and has a lot to make up for. You know who would look good at the 3 next to a PnR duo of Russell/Towns and who plays defense? The guy we just traded away for a mid-late first round pick.
I can't disagree with this. At all.
IF Covington was gonna be part of the trade for Russell, so be it. But looking at the two things being unconnected... I understand the Covington deal A LOT less.
We always hear about player timelines. Do you know what one of the worst historical player timelines is...
A bunch of young guns trying to "get theirs" at the same time. Covington was a pro who was liked by the star player who didn't need the ball in his hands much and was willing to play defense.
My guess is that he feels Beasley will be a solid starter so we will see. The mid round pick is meh. The rest of the package, meh. Kind of throwing darts it felt like. Cov is a bit older though so I do agree with Rosas about going young.
AbeVigodaLive wrote:WolvesFan21 wrote:AbeVigodaLive wrote:khans2k5 wrote:BloopOracle wrote:He doesn't deserve to be crowned but hopefully this slows down some of the Rosas slander
He traded up to draft one of the worst shooters in the NBA and his team trying to push for the playoffs is pushing for a top 5 pick instead. None of it has been slander. He's been real bad so far and has a lot to make up for. You know who would look good at the 3 next to a PnR duo of Russell/Towns and who plays defense? The guy we just traded away for a mid-late first round pick.
I can't disagree with this. At all.
IF Covington was gonna be part of the trade for Russell, so be it. But looking at the two things being unconnected... I understand the Covington deal A LOT less.
We always hear about player timelines. Do you know what one of the worst historical player timelines is...
A bunch of young guns trying to "get theirs" at the same time. Covington was a pro who was liked by the star player who didn't need the ball in his hands much and was willing to play defense.
My guess is that he feels Beasley will be a solid starter so we will see. The mid round pick is meh. The rest of the package, meh. Kind of throwing darts it felt like. Cov is a bit older though so I do agree with Rosas about going young.
Was Covington not a solid starter? Beasley is reportedly gonna ask for about the same amount of money.
And the days of building a team that grows and learns together is a dying breed in today's NBA. The days that everybody is the same age is pretty meh... especially when it's an organization with so little successful collateral.
I can talk myself into the Russell trade. He might not be the guy we need. Heck, he's probably not. I get it. He doesn't play D and is inefficient at stuff. And he keeps getting traded. All fair.
It's harder for me to digest the Covington trade after seeing this one though.
AbeVigodaLive wrote:WolvesFan21 wrote:AbeVigodaLive wrote:khans2k5 wrote:BloopOracle wrote:He doesn't deserve to be crowned but hopefully this slows down some of the Rosas slander
He traded up to draft one of the worst shooters in the NBA and his team trying to push for the playoffs is pushing for a top 5 pick instead. None of it has been slander. He's been real bad so far and has a lot to make up for. You know who would look good at the 3 next to a PnR duo of Russell/Towns and who plays defense? The guy we just traded away for a mid-late first round pick.
I can't disagree with this. At all.
IF Covington was gonna be part of the trade for Russell, so be it. But looking at the two things being unconnected... I understand the Covington deal A LOT less.
We always hear about player timelines. Do you know what one of the worst historical player timelines is...
A bunch of young guns trying to "get theirs" at the same time. Covington was a pro who was liked by the star player who didn't need the ball in his hands much and was willing to play defense.
My guess is that he feels Beasley will be a solid starter so we will see. The mid round pick is meh. The rest of the package, meh. Kind of throwing darts it felt like. Cov is a bit older though so I do agree with Rosas about going young.
Was Covington not a solid starter? Beasley is reportedly gonna ask for about the same amount of money.
And the days of building a team that grows and learns together is a dying breed in today's NBA. The days that everybody is the same age is pretty meh... especially when it's an organization with so little successful collateral.
I can talk myself into the Russell trade. He might not be the guy we need. Heck, he's probably not. I get it. He doesn't play D and is inefficient at stuff. And he keeps getting traded. All fair.
It's harder for me to digest the Covington trade after seeing this one though.
WildWolf2813 wrote:AbeVigodaLive wrote:WolvesFan21 wrote:AbeVigodaLive wrote:khans2k5 wrote:BloopOracle wrote:He doesn't deserve to be crowned but hopefully this slows down some of the Rosas slander
He traded up to draft one of the worst shooters in the NBA and his team trying to push for the playoffs is pushing for a top 5 pick instead. None of it has been slander. He's been real bad so far and has a lot to make up for. You know who would look good at the 3 next to a PnR duo of Russell/Towns and who plays defense? The guy we just traded away for a mid-late first round pick.
I can't disagree with this. At all.
IF Covington was gonna be part of the trade for Russell, so be it. But looking at the two things being unconnected... I understand the Covington deal A LOT less.
We always hear about player timelines. Do you know what one of the worst historical player timelines is...
A bunch of young guns trying to "get theirs" at the same time. Covington was a pro who was liked by the star player who didn't need the ball in his hands much and was willing to play defense.
My guess is that he feels Beasley will be a solid starter so we will see. The mid round pick is meh. The rest of the package, meh. Kind of throwing darts it felt like. Cov is a bit older though so I do agree with Rosas about going young.
Was Covington not a solid starter? Beasley is reportedly gonna ask for about the same amount of money.
And the days of building a team that grows and learns together is a dying breed in today's NBA. The days that everybody is the same age is pretty meh... especially when it's an organization with so little successful collateral.
I can talk myself into the Russell trade. He might not be the guy we need. Heck, he's probably not. I get it. He doesn't play D and is inefficient at stuff. And he keeps getting traded. All fair.
It's harder for me to digest the Covington trade after seeing this one though.
Franchises like this one don't have the kind of extended window to compete. That's why I've never embraced the concept of building a team like a boy band.