Wolves Back Mitchell

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
bleedspeed
Posts: 8173
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wolves Back Mitchell

Post by bleedspeed »

I have already accepted this.
User avatar
khans2k5 [enjin:6608728]
Posts: 6414
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wolves Back Mitchell

Post by khans2k5 [enjin:6608728] »

Durant and Westbrook backed Brooks until the end. Players shouldn't decide coaches. Just look at Lebron. The few times he's won titles in his career were under a coach he didn't pick. Now he's back to picking coaches in Cleveland again and they aren't going to win a title again. Good GM's pick the guys they want and don't let star players dictate the hire. They can have input on the hire, but don't let them be the deciding factor on picking someone.
User avatar
khans2k5 [enjin:6608728]
Posts: 6414
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wolves Back Mitchell

Post by khans2k5 [enjin:6608728] »

http://www.awolfamongwolves.com/2016/04/espns-marc-stein-rising-belief-sam-mitchell-will-not-return-to-wolves-bench/
User avatar
Phenom
Posts: 3297
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wolves Back Mitchell

Post by Phenom »

Wiggins, Towns and the rest will likely back whoever replaces Mitchell as well. Non issue
User avatar
AbeVigodaLive
Posts: 10272
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wolves Back Mitchell

Post by AbeVigodaLive »

khans2k5 wrote:http://www.awolfamongwolves.com/2016/04/espns-marc-stein-rising-belief-sam-mitchell-will-not-return-to-wolves-bench/



Don't do it, Khans. Not you...

Image
User avatar
Phenom
Posts: 3297
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wolves Back Mitchell

Post by Phenom »

khans2k5 wrote:http://www.awolfamongwolves.com/2016/04/espns-marc-stein-rising-belief-sam-mitchell-will-not-return-to-wolves-bench/


Good stuff. I'm down for having Thibs in Flips dual role.
User avatar
Phenom
Posts: 3297
Joined: Fri Jul 12, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wolves Back Mitchell

Post by Phenom »

Adrian Wojnarowski - Verified account ?@WojVerticalNBA

Sources: Minnesota embarking on head coaching search that includes Sam Mitchell as part of candidate process. List: Van Gundy, Thibs, Brooks

SOLD
User avatar
thedoper
Posts: 11008
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wolves Back Mitchell

Post by thedoper »

Phenom's_Revenge wrote:Adrian Wojnarowski - Verified account ?@WojVerticalNBA

Sources: Minnesota embarking on head coaching search that includes Sam Mitchell as part of candidate process. List: Van Gundy, Thibs, Brooks

SOLD


I don't see the difference of Brooks and Mitchell personally. I think the same criticisms of Mitchell apply to Brooks. I like the defensive guru approach. I rank Van Gundy ahead of Thibs only because he doesn't have the hard ass vibe I get from Thibs and I think Van Gundy would be able to reach Wiggins along with creating a system for our D. Would like Thibs too, but I love Van Gundy for this team.
User avatar
Coolbreeze44
Posts: 13192
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wolves Back Mitchell

Post by Coolbreeze44 »

I hope that list would become larger. I'd like to see names like Boylen, Ollie, Jensen, Smart get consideration also.
User avatar
AbeVigodaLive
Posts: 10272
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Wolves Back Mitchell

Post by AbeVigodaLive »

thedoper wrote:
Phenom's_Revenge wrote:Adrian Wojnarowski - Verified account ?@WojVerticalNBA

Sources: Minnesota embarking on head coaching search that includes Sam Mitchell as part of candidate process. List: Van Gundy, Thibs, Brooks

SOLD


I don't see the difference of Brooks and Mitchell personally. I think the same criticisms of Mitchell apply to Brooks. I like the defensive guru approach. I rank Van Gundy ahead of Thibs only because he doesn't have the hard ass vibe I get from Thibs and I think Van Gundy would be able to reach Wiggins along with creating a system for our D. Would like Thibs too, but I love Van Gundy for this team.



Even though I like him... the one thing about Van Gundy...

He hasn't coached since 2007. The NBA is a bit of a different animal. I know he calls games... but he's not putting in the same diligent work. I heard him on the Zach Lowe podcast and it seemed to be pretty clear Van Gundy isn't do deep-digging research. He flies in to do the games and does his research for those teams.

That's not to say those are reasons to omit him from the process. Only that it MIGHT take time to adjust to today's game.


[Note: And while I agree that Brooks seemed to have a ceiling... he can point to the fact that he was able to balance superstar egos pretty well... even if part of that was creating an insulated culture around them where local criticism was almost unheard of.]
Post Reply