CoolBreeze44 wrote:AbeVigodaLive wrote:Agree with a lot of it. A couple of discussion points where we might differ though...
As far as the free throws... yeah, it kind of was just Wiggins. At least if you're talking about unacceptable efforts. He was 2 - 8. Granted, Gorgui missed 2. And Rubio missed one late... but the rest of the team shot 12 - 16 (75%). That's below average, but not by much.
I dig the optimism with Wiggins. But athleticism doesn't equal talent, necessarily. Leonard is one of the league's smartest players on both ends of the court to go with his athleticism. It's highly doubtful Wiggins ever gets the same feel for the game that Leonard has. That's not a knock on Wiggins... it's testament to Leonard. Tonight's a good example, the guy had 17/11 on only 9 shots.
Yeah well Leonard is in his 5th year. I remember them being pretty comparable as 1st/2nd year players. Leonard's game has taken huge leaps during his 4th/5th years. I guess we will just have to see what Andrew looks like after another 250- games. Leonard has also had the advantage of being developed by Pop and playing alongside a bunch of championship caliber players.
Wait. I'm not necessarily comparing them. I'm simply pointing out the dangers in doing so. You can't take anything for granted in the NBA, especially if we're talking about tremendous savvy. IF Wiggins becomes as smart as Leonard... awesome. But, I'm not expecting it. That would be one helluva bonus if he gets there though.
Actually, I don't know if I'd compare them too much even in their first two seasons, just because of such drastic situational differences. Athletically, sure... but just look at their respective roles. Wiggins was the ballyhooed #1 pick for a mediocre turned shit-tastic team (injuries). He was given big minutes and big responsibilities. Leonard wasn't even a lottery pick who joined a perpetual title contender.
Wiggins has been learning on the fly from retreads, other young guys and largely mediocre players. SAS could pick and choose where/when to give Leonard more responsibilities with plenty of opportunities to learn from multiple HOF teammates who were still legit NBA players and arguably one of the game's greatest coaches.
As a result, Leonard posted modest but efficient stats. Grew into a great defender. And learned the little things that not only win games... but win championships. Wiggins has posted more gaudy stats, but with fairly poor efficiency since he's arguably been the best guy on bad teams.
Very different ways to break into the league... and to learn. Which way is best? Depends on the player. Regardless, I think for the most part, great players are going to be great if they have that inner drive. For example, Durant learned early while taking lumps on crappy teams his first two seasons.
[Note: Your note on Leonard in Year 5 is important. The guy has shown tremendous improvement in each of his 5 seasons in the league. I've said it dozens of times now... I try not to get too worked up over a game. Or, even a series of games... as long as there seems to be improvement along the way. I hope Wiggins becomes as good as Leonard someday. We all do.]