Minnesota Sports Forum

No way is Stanley 245, Lebron is about 250

BizarroJerry wrote:No way is Stanley 245, Lebron is about 250

He's 245. Not sure you're looking at the right guy if you see otherwise.

I actually look at Stanley's size as one of the things that weighs his stock down a bit. There is no further upside for him physically. He's already a fully grown man that is absolutely huge for his position in college. Yet he struggles to dominate, which points more towards some skill deficiencies.

I'm not suggesting he's a bad prospect, but when you talk about top 5 type picks, you need to start splitting hairs.

LloydBraun wrote:No way is Stanley 245, Lebron is about 250

Lebron is 260-270 easy. He's a 6'8 brick house. He's always kept his listing 250>. The Baylor brick shithouse football player is 6'9, 400 because he's all muscle at his height.

I know a couple people like Portis....and he may be a fine prospect....but he is not a difference maker. Just not enough skill or dominance. Not impressed the few times I have seen him. I want nothing to do with him.

Portis not a difference maker? How about carrying an Arkansas team that has zero business making the tourney to a 5-seed. One of the most consistent producers in NCAA all year.

Towns making the case for numero uno

Camden wrote:Portis not a difference maker? How about carrying an Arkansas team that has zero business making the tourney to a 5-seed. One of the most consistent producers in NCAA all year.

I am specifically talking about what I think of his prospects as a pro. I just don't see anything in this guy that makes me think he will be an impact guy at the NBA level.

A Friendly Flatulence wrote:Towns making the case for numero uno

He's the guy.

A Friendly Flatulence wrote:Towns making the case for numero uno

I'm happy happy happy.