Page 2 of 3
Re: Hummel
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2015 4:03 pm
by Carlos Danger
I like Robbie. I don't think we really have a spot for him on this roster anymore. But I hope someone picks him up and he finds a role with a new team. He just seems like a nice bench guy that could find a way to fit in somewhere. But this Wolves team is really all about young/home run type guys along with a few veteran glue guys. Robbie doesn't really fit either.
Re: Hummel
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2015 4:06 pm
by Q12543 [enjin:6621299]
Carlos Danger wrote:I like Robbie. I don't think we really have a spot for him on this roster anymore. But I hope someone picks him up and he finds a role with a new team. He just seems like a nice bench guy that could find a way to fit in somewhere. But this Wolves team is really all about young/home run type guys along with a few veteran glue guys. Robbie doesn't really fit either.
He's a veteran glue guy all the way. While he's not old by any stretch, he basically plays mistake-free basketball. What would you replace him with at this point? What high-potential players are still out there that we could obtain and would be happy to sit on the bench?
Re: Hummel
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2015 4:06 pm
by 60WinTim
Robbie might fit if Bud gets moved.
Re: Hummel
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2015 4:11 pm
by Carlos Danger
Q12543 wrote:Carlos Danger wrote:I like Robbie. I don't think we really have a spot for him on this roster anymore. But I hope someone picks him up and he finds a role with a new team. He just seems like a nice bench guy that could find a way to fit in somewhere. But this Wolves team is really all about young/home run type guys along with a few veteran glue guys. Robbie doesn't really fit either.
He's a veteran glue guy all the way. While he's not old by any stretch, he basically plays mistake-free basketball. What would you replace him with at this point? What high-potential players are still out there that we could obtain and would be happy to sit on the bench?
I'm assuming they are replacing him with Bjelica.
Re: Hummel
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2015 4:27 pm
by Phenom
I take this as a sign that Bennett can't be moved. I'd honestly prefer Hummel at this point, probably over Payne as well.
Re: Hummel
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2015 4:38 pm
by TeamRicky [enjin:6648771]
Unfo
Phenom's_Revenge wrote:I take this as a sign that Bennett can't be moved. I'd honestly prefer Hummel at this point, probably over Payne as well.
I agree. Still hoping Flip can find a taker for AB. If Boston still wants him, I'd offer him for a draft pick or Tyler Zeller. I watched Zeller a lot last year and think he's vastly underrated.
Re: Hummel
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2015 4:41 pm
by 60WinTim
If Pek is unable to play, doesn't Payne become your 3rd center?
Re: Hummel
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2015 4:50 pm
by Carlos Danger
60WinTim wrote:If Pek is unable to play, doesn't Payne become your 3rd center?
I'd assume KG would play there if needed. But yeah, Payne could probably slide there as well in a pinch. Let's hope we don't need to go that deep though. I want to see Towns play a lot.
Re: Hummel
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2015 4:51 pm
by TeamRicky [enjin:6648771]
Its rumored that Toronto has put Terrence Ross on the trading block. He's been a disappointment as the 8th overall pick so far but he has the tools to be a decent 3 and D type player and maybe a change of scenery helps. I'd consider a straight swap of AB for Ross.
Re: Hummel
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2015 5:53 pm
by Monster
Carlos Danger wrote:60WinTim wrote:If Pek is unable to play, doesn't Payne become your 3rd center?
I'd assume KG would play there if needed. But yeah, Payne could probably slide there as well in a pinch. Let's hope we don't need to go that deep though. I want to see Towns play a lot.
Flip mentioned on the espn podcast with Marc Stein something about Payne playing center. He has the length no doubt it's the strength that's a problem. His length to play C one reason I think he has some value going forward. Let's hope he shows some growth in SL.