Keepers for Next Season

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
kekgeek
Posts: 14520
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Keepers for Next Season

Post by kekgeek »

lipoli390 wrote:
AbeVigodaLive wrote:
lipoli390 wrote:I generally agree with Abe's analysis.

But I wouldn't consider trading KAT.


I have him in the KEEP column. I think the addition/potential of Edwards helps immensely with any concerns around building around a center instead of a wing. IF he meets his potential, he's the guy you can give the ball too when they're fronting/doubling the post guy.

It's not entirely unlike the frustration so many people had during the Garnett years. It seemed so obvious what Garnett needed -- a brash, shot taking guard to relieve some of the pressure. Ironically, they had it immediately with Marbury... then we had to wait almost a decade for Cassell.

We'll see about the Collins stuff. I also wonder what else would be required in such a trade... Beasley won't be enough.


I think you're right that it would take more than Beasley to get Collins. The question is, how much more? As we all read, Atlanta was apparently demanding a future first in addition to Beasley and Rosas declined. I think he was right to decline and should reject that deal again if proposed. I'd give up Beasley, Culver and a future 2nd round pick (assuming we have any future 2nd round picks left). If that's not enough, then so be it. I like the front-court players we have in Naz, Vando and McDaniels. And now Juancho is starting to come around. All three of those guys still have lots of untapped upside and appear to have the drive to get better. So the Rosas shouldn't feel desperate to deal for another big. In fact, he shouldn't feel desperate to do any deals.


Legit question would you do Beasley and a top 10 protected 1st for Collins. Assuming Collins gets near max money. Wolves could do that trade if they lose their pick good offseason.

Trades really open up if the Wolves lose their pick they will be able to trade picks in 2022 and 23 what they can't do if the wolves keep their pick this year
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 24051
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Keepers for Next Season

Post by Monster »

kekgeek1 wrote:
lipoli390 wrote:
AbeVigodaLive wrote:
lipoli390 wrote:I generally agree with Abe's analysis.

But I wouldn't consider trading KAT.


I have him in the KEEP column. I think the addition/potential of Edwards helps immensely with any concerns around building around a center instead of a wing. IF he meets his potential, he's the guy you can give the ball too when they're fronting/doubling the post guy.

It's not entirely unlike the frustration so many people had during the Garnett years. It seemed so obvious what Garnett needed -- a brash, shot taking guard to relieve some of the pressure. Ironically, they had it immediately with Marbury... then we had to wait almost a decade for Cassell.

We'll see about the Collins stuff. I also wonder what else would be required in such a trade... Beasley won't be enough.


I think you're right that it would take more than Beasley to get Collins. The question is, how much more? As we all read, Atlanta was apparently demanding a future first in addition to Beasley and Rosas declined. I think he was right to decline and should reject that deal again if proposed. I'd give up Beasley, Culver and a future 2nd round pick (assuming we have any future 2nd round picks left). If that's not enough, then so be it. I like the front-court players we have in Naz, Vando and McDaniels. And now Juancho is starting to come around. All three of those guys still have lots of untapped upside and appear to have the drive to get better. So the Rosas shouldn't feel desperate to deal for another big. In fact, he shouldn't feel desperate to do any deals.


Legit question would you do Beasley and a top 10 protected 1st for Collins. Assuming Collins gets near max money. Wolves could do that trade if they lose their pick good offseason.

Trades really open up if the Wolves lose their pick they will be able to trade picks in 2022 and 23 what they can't do if the wolves keep their pick this year


The difference I see in a sign and trade is that you know you are getting collins and how much he is getting paid. If Rosas had to give up Beasley and a pick that he didn't even know when he was giving it up for a guy he would be forced to match a max deal for then he may not be willing to do that. Maybe he does it if he knows what contract Collins is getting and also knows what the outcome of his future pick situation is. He will also know more about his roster construction after another chunk of games has been played this season. As Lip said maybe he doesn't go al in on Collins right now.

What are some other options?

Take a flyer on Bagley

Is Toppin available?

Maybe sign a solid vet PF for relatively cheap to help with the committee they currently have as well and keeping Vanderbilt.

Maybe some other FA I haven't thought of that see's a relatively wide open starting spot here and that's a positive in terms of the Wolves being able to land him.

Making a move and getting back into the first round of the upcoming draft and selecting a guy even late 1st with some legit potential.

In house options:

Juancho isn't the answer but he might be part of a committee approach. He is starting to come around in terms of 3 point shooting for the season and he is shooting over 60% on 2 point shots including over 70% at the rim. I think he is a guy that has the willingness to play less minutes than a starter he just needs to find the right role and maybe Finch and the Wolves can get him there. Vanderbilt is interesting and then you have Mcdaniels that can play small ball 4 and maybe the most intruiging player is Naz Reid. Notice nobody even considered him play at all in summer league going into his 3rd season which is a pretty big compliment for an undrafted rookie big.

Ultimately Rosas is going to go after some higher end talent this summer but idk what the price will or should be. Beasley does seem like a pretty nice trade chip to start with.
User avatar
Q12543 [enjin:6621299]
Posts: 13844
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Keepers for Next Season

Post by Q12543 [enjin:6621299] »

We have a logjam at the 2. Nowell, Beasley, Culver, Ant, and DLO all can play the 2. Beasley is by far the most tradeable asset in terms of us having a reasonable succession plan (we've been doing just fine without him) and him bringing back real value as a 20PPG sharpshooter on a good contract.

At PF, it seems like everyone we try there is more effective in a bench role vs. a starting role. Vando has been fantastic off the bench - both earlier in the season and now. But when he started at PF, all of his flaws were more glaring (bad hands, turnovers, cheap fouls).

Juancho has been great lately but he has mostly played the 3 and just doesn't have the defensive chops to start next to KAT.

McDaniels can definitely play some 4, but wouldn't he ideally be a starting 3 with Ant starting at the 2?

Bottom-line....still feels like we need to solidify that starting 4 slot in order to maximize how we use the other guys as well.
User avatar
JasonIsDaMan [enjin:7981157]
Posts: 1270
Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Keepers for Next Season

Post by JasonIsDaMan [enjin:7981157] »

Posts - That position group had a way better year than I thought they would. Davis won't be back. Vanderbilt is a toughie. I don't know what the rules are whether or not he has "Bird Rights" and even if they can there's the Lux to worry about. But there are 16 teams that can theoretically offer him more than the MLE, and this is the first year he's played more than 75 MINUTES, and maybe just maybe his agent had a talk with him last Thanksgiving, so maybe there is another solution. Everyone else is either great or young/cheap.

Wings - AE CAN become great, but his year was worse than anyone is saying it was. There is no world in which you contend for a championship with JO/JC as your 3rd/4th best wings. I like JL, but Chris Finch DOES NOT. And Balmaro is coming. As far as Beasley, I'm afraid to look at "Off Court" stats on 82games because I'm afraid it's simply going to say "Kind of an asshole off the court."

Points - I'm looking forward to the day when all of Blonde Ricky's friends on the Wolves can text him in his new city.

I'm going to post this once rather than to every draft thread on here for the next 9 weeks: How about the Wolves win the lottery, then trade #1/BRR/JO/JC/JL(TO) to DET for TheirPick/Grant/Plumlee. I feel like that's the best way for this team to improve. Plumlee plays JV's minutes, Grant plays JO/JC/JL's minutes, and the DET pick plays DAR's minutes and DAR plays BRR's minutes. That's a good team, and a good time.
User avatar
thedoper
Posts: 11008
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Keepers for Next Season

Post by thedoper »

If some combination(s) of Culver, Layman, Rubio, Juancho, and smartly protected picks can get us an upgrade at the 4 you do it and thank heaven for the gift from God.

If Beasley + a smartly protected pick gets a legit 4 I do it. Kat, Ant, and Dlo seem to be providing enough scoring, Beasley is depth at this point.

Any improvements by Ant in his shot and defensive engagement is going to help this team in a big way. It is hard not to feel good about a 4 game win streak even when it carries no weight toward the playoffs.
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 24051
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Keepers for Next Season

Post by Monster »

He isn't a keeper, far from it and there may simply not be any room for him on the roster but l looked up McLaughlin's numbers since the AS break. He has been pretty efficient with his shooting and to me that was his problem earlier in the season once he was up to speed. He will also probably look for a better opportunity but for a partially non guaranteed vet min deal (if some of the guard glut is cleared out) making him a cheap 3rd PG I could be on board with that. My guess is they will look to upgrade to someone else (like the possible signing kid Henry or being over Bolmaro) but I still think J-Mac could have solid value as a cheap depth guy.
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 24051
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Keepers for Next Season

Post by Monster »

Q12543 wrote:We have a logjam at the 2. Nowell, Beasley, Culver, Ant, and DLO all can play the 2. Beasley is by far the most tradeable asset in terms of us having a reasonable succession plan (we've been doing just fine without him) and him bringing back real value as a 20PPG sharpshooter on a good contract.

At PF, it seems like everyone we try there is more effective in a bench role vs. a starting role. Vando has been fantastic off the bench - both earlier in the season and now. But when he started at PF, all of his flaws were more glaring (bad hands, turnovers, cheap fouls).

Juancho has been great lately but he has mostly played the 3 and just doesn't have the defensive chops to start next to KAT.

McDaniels can definitely play some 4, but wouldn't he ideally be a starting 3 with Ant starting at the 2?

Bottom-line....still feels like we need to solidify that starting 4 slot in order to maximize how we use the other guys as well.


I agree that it makes sense to cash in some perimeter players for a PF but what if their isn't a deal that makes sense? It seemed like the price for some guys at the trade deadline was pretty steep and some PF got a boatload of money last offseason. Decent PFs somehow got really sexy...as Wolves fans maybe we can see why. Lol is there a really solid PF we could get that isn't a scorer since like you said we do have a lot of scoring already? How much would a guy like Thad Young cost to be the starter to be the guy who is then filled in around with other guys? Just looked up his stats...maybe the Bulls will pay him that 14 million next year. Along with some other solid stats he is also averaging over 4 assists in 24 mpg.
User avatar
AbeVigodaLive
Posts: 10272
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Keepers for Next Season

Post by AbeVigodaLive »

McLaughlin is serviceable as a 3rd string PG. Not much more than that.
User avatar
Lipoli390
Posts: 16252
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Keepers for Next Season

Post by Lipoli390 »

monsterpile wrote:
Q12543 wrote:We have a logjam at the 2. Nowell, Beasley, Culver, Ant, and DLO all can play the 2. Beasley is by far the most tradeable asset in terms of us having a reasonable succession plan (we've been doing just fine without him) and him bringing back real value as a 20PPG sharpshooter on a good contract.

At PF, it seems like everyone we try there is more effective in a bench role vs. a starting role. Vando has been fantastic off the bench - both earlier in the season and now. But when he started at PF, all of his flaws were more glaring (bad hands, turnovers, cheap fouls).

Juancho has been great lately but he has mostly played the 3 and just doesn't have the defensive chops to start next to KAT.

McDaniels can definitely play some 4, but wouldn't he ideally be a starting 3 with Ant starting at the 2?

Bottom-line....still feels like we need to solidify that starting 4 slot in order to maximize how we use the other guys as well.


I agree that it makes sense to cash in some perimeter players for a PF but what if their isn't a deal that makes sense? It seemed like the price for some guys at the trade deadline was pretty steep and some PF got a boatload of money last offseason. Decent PFs somehow got really sexy...as Wolves fans maybe we can see why. Lol is there a really solid PF we could get that isn't a scorer since like you said we do have a lot of scoring already? How much would a guy like Thad Young cost to be the starter to be the guy who is then filled in around with other guys? Just looked up his stats...maybe the Bulls will pay him that 14 million next year. Along with some other solid stats he is also averaging over 4 assists in 24 mpg.


I tend to agree with your thinking on this, Monster. I'm a John Collins fan, but if we have to give him a max contract and give up a future 1st round pick along with Beasley to get him, then I'm not interested. Part of my thinking is that Collins is mainly a scorer and we don't need another scorer. What we need next to KAT is a tough, defensive PF or C, preferably a good rim protector. I don't have anyone in mind at the moment, but I think we could get a guy like that who would be an upgrade at the PF position next to KAT without giving up a future 1st round pick. And I'm not ready to throw in the towel on the possibility that we already have the right guy to start next to KAT on the roster - possibly Naz, McDaniels, or Vando. All three guys still have more untapped upside, so the fact that Vando was better off the bench this season doesn't mean he won't improve enough to be the defensive big we need next to KAT. I also agree with your thought about the possibility of PF by committee.
User avatar
Lipoli390
Posts: 16252
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Keepers for Next Season

Post by Lipoli390 »

Q12543 wrote:We have a logjam at the 2. Nowell, Beasley, Culver, Ant, and DLO all can play the 2. Beasley is by far the most tradeable asset in terms of us having a reasonable succession plan (we've been doing just fine without him) and him bringing back real value as a 20PPG sharpshooter on a good contract.

At PF, it seems like everyone we try there is more effective in a bench role vs. a starting role. Vando has been fantastic off the bench - both earlier in the season and now. But when he started at PF, all of his flaws were more glaring (bad hands, turnovers, cheap fouls).

Juancho has been great lately but he has mostly played the 3 and just doesn't have the defensive chops to start next to KAT.

McDaniels can definitely play some 4, but wouldn't he ideally be a starting 3 with Ant starting at the 2?

Bottom-line....still feels like we need to solidify that starting 4 slot in order to maximize how we use the other guys as well.


To break the logjam at the 2, I'd start out by dealing Culver. At this point, the best we can probably get would be an expiring vet contract and a future 2nd round pick. Unfortunately, that's what we'll need to settle for if we trade him. I agree that Beasley is the only valuable trade asset we have other than KAT, Ant, McDaniels and Naz. So I would definitely shop him this summer. But the Wolves shouldn't overlook the value Beasley provides this team. Right now he's the Wolves' only true 3-point marksman other than KAT. That's especially important given the Wolves' emphasis on 3-point shooting. He could play a critical role on this team as a 6th man. He is also our only proven high-caliber offensive player who can step in as a starter if Ant were to miss a stretch of games. So yes, I'd shop him. But I'd drive a hard bargain before trading him and not trading him could turn out to be the best move of all.
Post Reply