Minnesota Sports Forum

I will say 35, but we will look much better by the end of the year and scare a lot of teams on the edge of making the playoffs.

I'll take 37 wins. I think this team will be a little slow out of the gate, but will come on strong in mid December.

Locking in 34 wins.

Hmm.. Just ran the first version of the Klunk-O-Meter. It projects the Wolves record at 50-32!

1-1 in October. 7-6 in November. 9-6 in December.

Let's go!

30 Wins is my prediction. Too much youth not used to an 82 game season. I see us holding our own until January/February and then all downhill from there when injuries and fatigue set in from a long season.

Gonna stick to my prediction of 26 wins.



[Note: But depending on how active the team is trading... I can see it going lower than that. This team could be a 15 win team if they choose that route. I don't see more than 30 wins though.]

I said 37 in another thread, i'll stick with that. With JJ gone, I believe Flip will be playing Lavine more than we think. I think his plan is to really push Zach and Bazz (given he's being productive) into the regular rotation by season's end.

AbeVigodaLive wrote:Gonna stick to my prediction of 26 wins.



[Note: But depending on how active the team is trading... I can see it going lower than that. This team could be a 15 win team if they choose that route. I don't see more than 30 wins though.]

A black cloud moved in front of the sun as I read this post. Abe, clearly you did not read Tim's Klunk-o-Meter post before you wrote this!

60WinTim wrote:Hmm.. Just ran the first version of the Klunk-O-Meter. It projects the Wolves record at 50-32!

1-1 in October. 7-6 in November. 9-6 in December.

Let's go!

Ah, the return of the Klunk-O-Meter! I agree with the KOM's 1-1 October, but I'm too lazy to go out further than that.

One question, Tim. As the inventor of the KOM, can you help us with the pronunciation. Is the emphasis on the Klunk, or on the O (like barometer)? I like the latter, but I suspect it is the former.

LOL... I always put the emphasis on the klunk, but now that you mention it, the emphasis on the O makes it sound much more technical. Of course, since it is NOT very technical, we better just leave it on the klunk. :)