Page 2 of 2

Re: Kahn was a genius after all (or not)

Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2015 1:18 pm
by bleedspeed
I always liked Ridnour. It is to bad we couldn't have signed him as our backup PG this year.

Re: Kahn was a genius after all (or not)

Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2015 1:29 pm
by Papalrep
Millsap would help us. We wont get Aldridge without a max offer sheet

Re: Kahn was a genius after all (or not)

Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 3:30 pm
by TheGrey08
Q12543 wrote:
Hicks123 wrote:Lot's of PF available next year if you have the dough. Love (if he opts out....which he may), Aldridge, Millsap, Tristan Thompson.


Yeah, not to mention all the lunchpail types that will be available and can at least bang around in the paint and play with some level of competence. We may not be in a position to throw money at an RFA or highly sought-after FA, so it may not be a problem we can solve this offseason. By the way, we likely will need a backup PG as well, as Mo is only on a one-year deal and LaVine simply has no business playing that position. So there is that hole to fill too.

Our focus should be on getting the best player out of the draft possible and then seeing if there are any low-cost/high-value vets that can help fill in the gaps.

Or flip the pick & other filler for a good vet that actually FITS with all the young talent. Ideally a PF.

Re: Kahn was a genius after all (or not)

Posted: Thu Jan 08, 2015 3:55 pm
by Camden [enjin:6601484]
"Or flip the pick & other filler for a good vet that actually FITS with all the young talent. Ideally a PF."

No thanks. I'd like to grow a young nucleus together; one that wants to stay together. Ideally, Rubio-Wiggins-Muhammad-Towns-Dieng with LaVine as our combo guard off the bench.