Re: Does Martin have any trade value?
Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2014 7:10 pm
If I am trading with the Pelican's I would want Evan's for this team.
Wolves fan commiserate here!
https://forum.midwestvolleyball.com/phpBB3/
https://forum.midwestvolleyball.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=30720
bleedspeed177 wrote:If I am trading with the Pelican's I would want Evan's for this team.
Camden wrote:The Rage Monster wrote:I wonder if NO would trade Gordon for Martin and JJ? They have Holiday and Evans who can create their own shot so they don't need Gordon for that.
I'd rather have Waiters on his rookie deal.
The Rage Monster wrote:Camden wrote:The Rage Monster wrote:I wonder if NO would trade Gordon for Martin and JJ? They have Holiday and Evans who can create their own shot so they don't need Gordon for that.
I'd rather have Waiters on his rookie deal.
I would too but I'd actually do both deals. There would be probably be more to the deals but essentially Martin and JJ for Gordon and Pek for AV and Waiters. 3 deals in an offseason might be too much but there's a third deal I'd like to see as well, Bud/Luc and Shabazz for Thad Young
Camden wrote:The Rage Monster wrote:Camden wrote:The Rage Monster wrote:I wonder if NO would trade Gordon for Martin and JJ? They have Holiday and Evans who can create their own shot so they don't need Gordon for that.
I'd rather have Waiters on his rookie deal.
I would too but I'd actually do both deals. There would be probably be more to the deals but essentially Martin and JJ for Gordon and Pek for AV and Waiters. 3 deals in an offseason might be too much but there's a third deal I'd like to see as well, Bud/Luc and Shabazz for Thad Young
Wait, why would we go for Gordon if we acquired Waiters? I'd rather have Waiters/Martin than Waiters/Gordon based on talent, production last year and cost. And no way Philly makes that deal, but I do like Thad's game.
The more I think about it, we should be doing the most to get Waiters (without being stupid). He fits a lot of what we need.
Camden wrote:The Rage Monster wrote:Camden wrote:The Rage Monster wrote:I wonder if NO would trade Gordon for Martin and JJ? They have Holiday and Evans who can create their own shot so they don't need Gordon for that.
I'd rather have Waiters on his rookie deal.
I would too but I'd actually do both deals. There would be probably be more to the deals but essentially Martin and JJ for Gordon and Pek for AV and Waiters. 3 deals in an offseason might be too much but there's a third deal I'd like to see as well, Bud/Luc and Shabazz for Thad Young
Wait, why would we go for Gordon if we acquired Waiters? I'd rather have Waiters/Martin than Waiters/Gordon based on talent, production last year and cost. And no way Philly makes that deal, but I do like Thad's game.
The more I think about it, we should be doing the most to get Waiters (without being stupid). He fits a lot of what we need.
Q12543 wrote:When did Dion Waiters become so good? He seems to have more sizzle than substance. I get that he fits the mold of a classic SG, but that doesn't mean he's actually a good basketball player. He uses a lot of possessions to get his points.
I'm not suggesting that Martin, with all of his foibles, is necessarily a lot better, I just don't see how Dion Waiters is much of an upgrade. And to get rid of Pek for Varejao when we already have Dieng and Turiaf at Center? That's a head-scratcher....
This all seems like grasping at straws.....The S&T for Deng is the only credible deal I've seen on this board when it comes to Pek. And I'm not even 100% sure that is a great move.