Mike Conley gone

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
Leado01
Posts: 1549
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Mike Conley gone

Post by Leado01 »

AbeVigodaLive wrote: Wed Jul 01, 2026 1:43 pm LaMelo and Bones in the backcourt... whoa.

Woe?
Woe
1965-2025
"He Meant Well"
User avatar
Lipoli390
Posts: 17085
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Mike Conley gone

Post by Lipoli390 »

Monster wrote: Wed Jul 01, 2026 4:56 pm
AbeVigodaLive wrote: Wed Jul 01, 2026 1:43 pm LaMelo and Bones in the backcourt... whoa.

Woe?
I mean...compared to last season at PG...both of those guys are better than Dillingham was.
That’s for sure. And so is Ayo. PG has gone from a position of weakness to a position of strength. Unfortunately, or PF position has gone from a position of depth and strength to a position of uncertainty.
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 24658
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Mike Conley gone

Post by Monster »

Lipoli390 wrote: Wed Jul 01, 2026 8:23 pm
Monster wrote: Wed Jul 01, 2026 4:56 pm
AbeVigodaLive wrote: Wed Jul 01, 2026 1:43 pm LaMelo and Bones in the backcourt... whoa.

Woe?
I mean...compared to last season at PG...both of those guys are better than Dillingham was.
That’s for sure. And so is Ayo. PG has gone from a position of weakness to a position of strength. Unfortunately, or PF position has gone from a position of depth and strength to a position of uncertainty.
I would say having a nondescript PF is more manageable than a PG...unless you have a really unique roster or something.

Also remember back when the Wolves maybe had one worthwhile wing player? Now we are kinda talking about how we don't really need Josh Green and looking to trade him for a PF..times have changed! Lol
User avatar
TheGrey08
Posts: 1970
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Mike Conley gone

Post by TheGrey08 »

Monster wrote: Wed Jul 01, 2026 9:32 pm
Lipoli390 wrote: Wed Jul 01, 2026 8:23 pm That’s for sure. And so is Ayo. PG has gone from a position of weakness to a position of strength. Unfortunately, or PF position has gone from a position of depth and strength to a position of uncertainty.
I would say having a nondescript PF is more manageable than a PG...unless you have a really unique roster or something.

Also remember back when the Wolves maybe had one worthwhile wing player? Now we are kinda talking about how we don't really need Josh Green and looking to trade him for a PF..times have changed! Lol
For a lot of games you are probably right. Against some some of the bigger teams it could be more of a problem. For me the biggest reason to want a good sized stretch PF is the versatility it gives them. I want them to be able to keep a big lineup when needed as well as the ability to go small with Jaden at PF. Adaptability can be so clutch.
Post Reply