Re: Not reading much into Vikings’ decision to interview Shurmur? You should be
Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2016 2:19 pm
Norv on a short leash? How about Kalil, and to a certain degree, Zimmer?
I am not going to rehash Kalil's shortcomings. As it stands now, he will be the Vikes highest paid player next year. Does that make sense?
As far as Zimmer, this Parcells Junior schtick gets older by the week. With the possible exception of Thurman Munson, there is no more overrated sports figure of my lifetime. The Giants would have won that first Super Bowl with Ray Perkins as coach if he wouldn't have foolishly tried to replace Bear Bryant at Alabama, and they never get a chance at the second if Roger Craig doesn't fumble, so there's no need to even mention Scott Norwood's miss.
The person Zimmer really needed in his life is Belichek. He has his faults, and you can even argue he has broken enough rules to be banned from the league. But Tony Gonzales tells a great story from the Pro Bowl that he played in when NE lost to IND who eventually beat CHI in the SB: The QB threw an INT in walk-thru and ran by Gonzales on the runback. Gonzales barely made an effort. Belichek walked up to him and whispers "You call that an effing tackle". Gonzales then played on special teams an really hit the PR on a practice punt. Belichek walks up to him and whispers "Now thats how you tackle". Gonzales said it was one of his favorite memories from pro football.
Meanwhile, what would Parcells, and maybe Zimmmer, do? Call a press conference to bitch about him? Wouldn't surprise me.
There are seriously talent issues on the offensive side of the ball, especially the OLine, and they don't use there talent to the best of its ability. I mention CP as a RB, but I haven't even mentioned the most obvious: What about PUNTS? Or is Zimmer going to try to convince me that's to complicated too?
But, hey Khans, I guess the good news is that you are as good at figuring out the NFL as you are at figuring out the NBA and MLB.
I am not going to rehash Kalil's shortcomings. As it stands now, he will be the Vikes highest paid player next year. Does that make sense?
As far as Zimmer, this Parcells Junior schtick gets older by the week. With the possible exception of Thurman Munson, there is no more overrated sports figure of my lifetime. The Giants would have won that first Super Bowl with Ray Perkins as coach if he wouldn't have foolishly tried to replace Bear Bryant at Alabama, and they never get a chance at the second if Roger Craig doesn't fumble, so there's no need to even mention Scott Norwood's miss.
The person Zimmer really needed in his life is Belichek. He has his faults, and you can even argue he has broken enough rules to be banned from the league. But Tony Gonzales tells a great story from the Pro Bowl that he played in when NE lost to IND who eventually beat CHI in the SB: The QB threw an INT in walk-thru and ran by Gonzales on the runback. Gonzales barely made an effort. Belichek walked up to him and whispers "You call that an effing tackle". Gonzales then played on special teams an really hit the PR on a practice punt. Belichek walks up to him and whispers "Now thats how you tackle". Gonzales said it was one of his favorite memories from pro football.
Meanwhile, what would Parcells, and maybe Zimmmer, do? Call a press conference to bitch about him? Wouldn't surprise me.
There are seriously talent issues on the offensive side of the ball, especially the OLine, and they don't use there talent to the best of its ability. I mention CP as a RB, but I haven't even mentioned the most obvious: What about PUNTS? Or is Zimmer going to try to convince me that's to complicated too?
But, hey Khans, I guess the good news is that you are as good at figuring out the NFL as you are at figuring out the NBA and MLB.