Minnesota Sports Forum

CoolBreeze44 wrote:I would like to know if any of you only get your news from the MSM. CBS, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, CNN. Just be honest about it if you do. I can tailor my responses better if that's the case.

Podcasts. BBC, NYT, Shapiro, Crenshaw, ABC, PBS, Ezra Klein, Pod Save America, Common Sense w/ Dan Harris, Making Sense w/ Sam Harris

Every once and a while I'll listen to conspiracy podcasts Tin Foil Hat w/ Sam Tripoli, Conspiracy Unlimited w/ Richard Syrett.

Why didn't you list FOX as MSM?

I don't think 2016 nor 2012, or 2008.... were legitimate elections either. Can anyone prove to me either was. Can you show me a local video of ballots being audited and counted by hand. Can anyone show up and oversee the process? Any computer can be hijacked, if not be designed to be programmed any way. The media is completely fictional as well so you cannot believe a single thing they say. Why would an election be legitimate? lol

Sorry if I don't "trust" the psychopaths in power to put on legitimate elections.

Politics and News is essentially WWE wrestling these days. Silly entertainment at best. The CIA admitted long ago nothing you watch should be considered true. So why do you?

Volans19 wrote:

CoolBreeze44 wrote:I would like to know if any of you only get your news from the MSM. CBS, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, CNN. Just be honest about it if you do. I can tailor my responses better if that's the case.

Podcasts. BBC, NYTNYT, Shapiro, Crenshaw, ABCABC, PBS, Ezra Klein, Pod Save America, Common Sense w/ Dan Harris, Making Sense w/ Sam Harris

Every once and a while I'll listen to conspiracy podcasts Tin Foil Hat w/ Sam Tripoli, Conspiracy Unlimited w/ Richard Syrett.

Why didn't you list FOX as MSM?

I don't know why anyone would read the NYT. Surprised you didn't have the Washington Post in there too. I didn't include Fox because they are actually the most balanced network out there now. Their evening lineup is conservative but they have a lot of liberal viewpoints throughout the day. There was a definite shift after the election. Newsmax is now the most conservative news network that I know of.

monsterpile wrote:

CoolBreeze44 wrote:There is irrefutable evidence the election was stolen. You may or may not have heard about the testimony in an Italian court from the man himself who flipped votes in the software. There is a ton more real evidence. I get pissed when people bring up the fact that it was denied in over 50 court cases. Most of those cases didn't even get to the evidence stage, they were thrown out on technicalities. And just like you have dirty politicians, you have dirty judges. The deep State in coordination with their communist influencers have paid billions of dollars to buy off people at all levels of government, including the state governments particularly in the swing states.

The other thing is the near statistical impossibility that Biden could have won. Look at the number of counties Trump won compared to what he won in 2016, and how few Biden won. But just by coincidence Biden made up all that ground in swing states only, while no similar anomaly was found in other states. And then the vote totals were just enough in those states to give Biden the wins he needed. The theft was a coordinated effort between the DNC, Big Tech, and China. I deleted my Twitter account yesterday after being a member for 11 years due to the unabashed censorship going on there. This nation is in big trouble.

My apologies to Drew, I did not read your post because it's simply too long. I did skim it. I like threads that make a point or two. It's easier to reply and keep moving. (I know my original post was very long - sorry for that)

Please post your evidence.

Edit: So I don't get it from the incorrect sources. :)

Monster, I don't keep this evidence in a trove. If you can find a browser that doesn't filter results like Google does, you can do a simple search to find the Italian story. I know you can get a copy of Sidney Powell's 270 page report which should have enough irrefutable evidence for anyone. There are tons of podcasts out there that discuss the evidence. I'd recommend a couple but they are typically know to be conservative.

CoolBreeze44 wrote:

Volans19 wrote:

CoolBreeze44 wrote:I would like to know if any of you only get your news from the MSM. CBS, ABC, NBC, MSNBC, CNN. Just be honest about it if you do. I can tailor my responses better if that's the case.

Podcasts. BBC, NYTNYT, Shapiro, Crenshaw, ABCABC, PBS, Ezra Klein, Pod Save America, Common Sense w/ Dan Harris, Making Sense w/ Sam Harris

Every once and a while I'll listen to conspiracy podcasts Tin Foil Hat w/ Sam Tripoli, Conspiracy Unlimited w/ Richard Syrett.

Why didn't you list FOX as MSM?

I don't know why anyone would read the NYT. Surprised you didn't have the Washington Post in there too. I didn't include Fox because they are actually the most balanced network out there now. Their evening lineup is conservative but they have a lot of liberal viewpoints throughout the day. There was a definite shift after the election. Newsmax is now the most conservative news network that I know of.

Riiiiight.

The point of the post is that I listen to many different voices on both sides and looney toons conspiracists like Bishop Larry Gaiters and dumbfuck Qanon guys.

FOX is just counter programming to NBC, both are partisan hack networks.

CoolBreeze44 wrote:

monsterpile wrote:

CoolBreeze44 wrote:There is irrefutable evidence the election was stolen. You may or may not have heard about the testimony in an Italian court from the man himself who flipped votes in the software. There is a ton more real evidence. I get pissed when people bring up the fact that it was denied in over 50 court cases. Most of those cases didn't even get to the evidence stage, they were thrown out on technicalities. And just like you have dirty politicians, you have dirty judges. The deep State in coordination with their communist influencers have paid billions of dollars to buy off people at all levels of government, including the state governments particularly in the swing states.

The other thing is the near statistical impossibility that Biden could have won. Look at the number of counties Trump won compared to what he won in 2016, and how few Biden won. But just by coincidence Biden made up all that ground in swing states only, while no similar anomaly was found in other states. And then the vote totals were just enough in those states to give Biden the wins he needed. The theft was a coordinated effort between the DNC, Big Tech, and China. I deleted my Twitter account yesterday after being a member for 11 years due to the unabashed censorship going on there. This nation is in big trouble.

My apologies to Drew, I did not read your post because it's simply too long. I did skim it. I like threads that make a point or two. It's easier to reply and keep moving. (I know my original post was very long - sorry for that)

Please post your evidence.

Edit: So I don't get it from the incorrect sources. :)

Monster, I don't keep this evidence in a trove. If you can find a browser that doesn't filter results like Google does, you can do a simple search to find the Italian story. I know you can get a copy of Sidney Powell's 270 page report which should have enough irrefutable evidence for anyone. There are tons of podcasts out there that discuss the evidence. I'd recommend a couple but they are typically know to be conservative.

Just post the link. If you have "evidence" just post the link. Name the podcasts. We are trying to open eyes here right?

WolvesFan21 wrote:I don't think 2016 nor 2012, or 2008.... were legitimate elections either. Can anyone prove to me either was. Can you show me a local video of ballots being audited and counted by hand. Can anyone show up and oversee the process? Any computer can be hijacked, if not be designed to be programmed any way. The media is completely fictional as well so you cannot believe a single thing they say. Why would an election be legitimate? lol

Sorry if I don't "trust" the psychopaths in power to put on legitimate elections.

Politics and News is essentially WWE wrestling these days. Silly entertainment at best. The CIA admitted long ago nothing you watch should be considered true. So why do you?

So if nothing I watch can be considered true that must mean nothing I read should be considered true too.

If you follow that logic you're going to end up in a straightjacket.

Has there ever been a legitimate election?

Volans19 wrote:

WolvesFan21 wrote:I don't think 2016 nor 2012, or 2008.... were legitimate elections either. Can anyone prove to me either was. Can you show me a local video of ballots being audited and counted by hand. Can anyone show up and oversee the process? Any computer can be hijacked, if not be designed to be programmed any way. The media is completely fictional as well so you cannot believe a single thing they say. Why would an election be legitimate? lol

Sorry if I don't "trust" the psychopaths in power to put on legitimate elections.

Politics and News is essentially WWE wrestling these days. Silly entertainment at best. The CIA admitted long ago nothing you watch should be considered true. So why do you?

So if nothing I watch can be considered true that must mean nothing I read should be considered true too.

If you follow that logic you're going to end up in a straightjacket.

Has there ever been a legitimate election?

We are in the matrix.

Volans19 wrote:

WolvesFan21 wrote:I don't think 2016 nor 2012, or 2008.... were legitimate elections either. Can anyone prove to me either was. Can you show me a local video of ballots being audited and counted by hand. Can anyone show up and oversee the process? Any computer can be hijacked, if not be designed to be programmed any way. The media is completely fictional as well so you cannot believe a single thing they say. Why would an election be legitimate? lol

Sorry if I don't "trust" the psychopaths in power to put on legitimate elections.

Politics and News is essentially WWE wrestling these days. Silly entertainment at best. The CIA admitted long ago nothing you watch should be considered true. So why do you?

So if nothing I watch can be considered true that must mean nothing I read should be considered true too.

If you follow that logic you're going to end up in a straightjacket.

Has there ever been a legitimate election?

Just don't read or watch the "news" anywhere. I don't. I use to watch FOX news 4 hours a day about 15 years ago. Until I found out how fake it really was, how scripted it was. All you need to "know" is that the news is garbage. It's a waste of time anyways, the stuff that is probably true.

monsterpile wrote:

Volans19 wrote:

WolvesFan21 wrote:I don't think 2016 nor 2012, or 2008.... were legitimate elections either. Can anyone prove to me either was. Can you show me a local video of ballots being audited and counted by hand. Can anyone show up and oversee the process? Any computer can be hijacked, if not be designed to be programmed any way. The media is completely fictional as well so you cannot believe a single thing they say. Why would an election be legitimate? lol

Sorry if I don't "trust" the psychopaths in power to put on legitimate elections.

Politics and News is essentially WWE wrestling these days. Silly entertainment at best. The CIA admitted long ago nothing you watch should be considered true. So why do you?

So if nothing I watch can be considered true that must mean nothing I read should be considered true too.

If you follow that logic you're going to end up in a straightjacket.

Has there ever been a legitimate election?

We are in the matrix.

IDK, It's scripted for sure. Not sports though, some guys will say sports are scripted and they are not to me. Not at the highest level for the big money anyways. Is there some referees that bet on games still? I would think so. So I guess it can be controlled sometimes?

Weather can even be scripted. Look up Operation Popeye -

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Popeye


Military engagements during the Vietnam War
Operation Popeye (Project Controlled Weather Popeye / Motorpool / Intermediary-Compatriot) was a military cloud-seeding carried out by the U.S. Air Force during the Vietnam War in 1967-1972. The highly classified program attempted to extend the monsoon season over specific areas of the Ho Chi Minh Trail, in order to disrupt North Vietnamese military supplies by softening road surfaces and causing landslides.

The former U.S. Secretary of Defense, Robert S. McNamara, was aware that there might be objections raised by the international scientific community but said in a memo to the president that such objections had not in the past been a basis for prevention of military activities considered to be in the interests of U.S. national security.

The chemical weather modification program was conducted from Thailand over Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam and allegedly sponsored by Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and CIA without the authorization of then Secretary of Defense Melvin Laird who had categorically denied to Congress that a program for modification of the weather for use as a tactical weapon even existed.[1]