WolvesFan21 wrote:monsterpile wrote:WolvesFan21 wrote:So he is going to the Pats. Probably so he can stick it to all the pundits, his old teammates in Pitt. Etc. Brady, who takes less than he should, essentially is a way of cheating. He should be the top 2-3 paid, but he doesn't want money., he wants to win, so he takes less to stack the deck. Thus they can sign more talent then others.
If Brown wants to go there to stick it too everyone else, it'll probably work. If he thinks he can get away with what he normally does, he'll be cut again, soon. We'll see. I'm sure he knows he can't screw around in NE.
Yeah I hate that Drew Brees guy taking less money what a cheater...
Did he too? What if he played for free? Or vet min? The salary cap was made to even the playing field, so when a couple players take less, yes it does not level the playing field. Call it cheating, whatever. We do know that the Pats got caught cheating deflating footballs, stealing coaches signs, etc also.
You can be OK with it but they don't play by the rules. Brady taking less money isn't against the rules, but it does help him win. So call it what you want.
I get where you are coming from. There is not rule that a player has to play for the absolute highest amount of money they can make. Seems like a calculated risk to me. For example what kind of financial benefits could you have by increasing your chances of winning another super bowl but say 20% (just throwing out a number) by taking 10 million less? What's the point of making another 10 million of you already made over 200 million just in salary and know you will have it come in for years? Smart people surround themselves with smart and or talented people. IMO this is no different. The guys that want as much as they can get...I generally have no problem with that either. Like a friend of mine said she tells her kids consequences aren't bad (or good) they are the outcomes of what happens sometimes because of a decision you make. These guys can choose to pay for enough less to have opportunities to build around them especially in their later years.
I will say you are right playing for free I would agree would not be allowed under the rules. :) These guys are still making over 20 million this year. They aren't playing for the vet min.
Anyway fun back and forth it's interesting to see differences in how we view things.