Minnesota Sports Forum

Doogie said today Garza has 10 games remaining on his 2-way. Do people no if it games played or games active for 2-ways?

Q-was-here wrote:

lipoli390 wrote:At least Gobert's feelings won't be hurt in the locker room after this game. :). As I've been saying for quite a while, this team is broken. DLO wasn't the problem.

Broken is a strong word for a team that is a game over .500 without one of its best players for most of the season.

I do agree that Gobert was a disappointment tonight. But so was our newly minted all-star.

I would say Nowell was the only solid player tonight

I know there is much talk about Gobert on offense but my frustration lies with his block numbers. I get that changing shots is just as, if not more important, but the paint defense from him just feels less than anticipated. His blocks per game is the second lowest since his rookie year. I don't know if shots contested is tracked somewhere but I'm guessing it's a similar story there. Perhaps his long summer is a factor or maybe his decline has hit hard.

kekgeek1 wrote:Doogie said today Garza has 10 games remaining on his 2-way. Do people no if it games played or games active for 2-ways?

Dane Moore said on a recent podcast that it was games active.

kekgeek1 wrote:

Q-was-here wrote:

lipoli390 wrote:At least Gobert's feelings won't be hurt in the locker room after this game. :). As I've been saying for quite a while, this team is broken. DLO wasn't the problem.

Broken is a strong word for a team that is a game over .500 without one of its best players for most of the season.

I do agree that Gobert was a disappointment tonight. But so was our newly minted all-star.

I would say Nowell was the only solid player tonight

Agree. Good to see him come alive. That's good games from him in 3 out of the last 4. May be he's finally broken out of that long shooting slump. All because someone finally happened to notice he wasn't holding his follow through! Unbelievable.

kekgeek1 wrote:Doogie said today Garza has 10 games remaining on his 2-way. Do people no if it games played or games active for 2-ways?

Can't be considered "active" for more than 50 games. I believe that to mean 50 games whether he plays or not.

It used to be 45 days before the rule change. Something will have to happen there.

Not a good look to get steam-rolled by Denver and Memphis. These guys are the measuring sticks in the West (well, and now Phoenix I guess) and we failed to make either game competitive.

Camden wrote:

kekgeek1 wrote:Doogie said today Garza has 10 games remaining on his 2-way. Do people no if it games played or games active for 2-ways?

Can't be considered "active" for more than 50 games. I believe that to mean 50 games whether he plays or not.

It used to be 45 days before the rule change. Something will have to happen there.

Gotcha, ya he is running out of NBA eligibility then

kekgeek1 wrote:

Camden wrote:

kekgeek1 wrote:Doogie said today Garza has 10 games remaining on his 2-way. Do people no if it games played or games active for 2-ways?

Can't be considered "active" for more than 50 games. I believe that to mean 50 games whether he plays or not.

It used to be 45 days before the rule change. Something will have to happen there.

Gotcha, ya he is running out of NBA eligibility then

Of course, he won't be active when KAT comes back.

Tonight's game and the Denver game a few nights ago are reminders that this team probably should sign Pat Beverley.