thedoper wrote:Q12543 wrote:Latest Net Ratings from NBA.com:
Gibson - +7.7
Butler - +5.8
Wiggins - +4.1
Jones - +3.6
Bjelly - +2.7
Teague - +2.6
KAT - +1.7
Dieng - -8.9
Crawford - -11.1
- Butler is the biggest mover, going into the second position behind Gibson. Kudos to Thibs for getting these two on board. They have been HUGE for us. We'd be a lottery team without them.
- KAT's defensive rating has improved over the last couple of weeks, which has finally gotten him into positive net rating territory. He still has the worst defensive rating of our starters.
- Tyus continues to do a solid job as either a backup or spot starter.
- Crawford is an absolute disaster defensively.
- Bjelly can't get back soon enough to bolster our bench, although he doesn't do much to fix the wing depth problem.
Why no mention of Wiggins? Clearly this is one of the positive stats for him that works in contrast to your theory that he hasn't improved any aspect of his game. This stat shows that good things happen when he's on the court, and unlike Towns he isn't as negatively impacted by Butler or Taj taking a seat. It's not just anecdotal, he is playing better team ball. Making the right first pass, filling the correct lanes on D, rotating to the right cover.
I mentioned Wiggins the last time I posted this set of stats. Yes, he's improved along the margins, but this is just one data point. Keep in mind also that much less is expected of him. He no longer has to guard the #1 wing opponent, nor is he guarded by the #1 wing defender. So he has it easier on both ends, yet he hasn't become any more productive or efficient than in years' past.
Now go look at the other data points: PER, WS/48, TS%, RPM, etc. and tell me what kind of overall picture it paints. He's not even close to anyone else getting max contracts. Frankly, I think we could swap him out for a very large group of other NBA starting wings and we wouldn't miss a beat.
That being said, he's miles better than Crawford or Bazz and is therefore very important to us based on our lack of depth on the wing.