Page 14 of 98

Re: WOJ Live: Free Agency Show

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 7:31 pm
by Monster
TheFuture wrote:
longstrangetrip wrote:I'm really scratching my head at the Blazers giving Evan Turner $70/4. They have their starting guards, so why does $18 per year make sense for a guy to come off the bench and not shoot very well?


I'd say he's going to be their starting SF with Aminu off the bench or playing small ball 4.

2 of Harkless, Henderson, and Crabbe are likely gone with that signing. I wouldn't mind seeing Crabbe or Henderson here.

I like Turner as a player, but not at that price. With Lillard, McCollum, and Turner they have 3 very good ball handlers on the wing. All of them are playmakers who can create a shot for themselves or others. I think they'll be difficult to defend.


It's just bizarre that the Blazers have all those wings and they go out and dif another one and for a huge amount of money. I would rather have Crabbe but maybe they match him too idk. Adding Turner is weird and that's before the big contract.

Re: WOJ Live: Free Agency Show

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 7:38 pm
by Monster
Rubio's contract working its way toward top backup money. Why trade him unless you get something pretty good?

Re: WOJ Live: Free Agency Show

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 7:49 pm
by mrhockey89
monsterpile wrote:Rubio's contract working its way toward top backup money. Why trade him unless you get something pretty good?


because he can't shoot, duh ;)

Re: WOJ Live: Free Agency Show

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 8:34 pm
by TheFuture
TheSP wrote:
TeamRicky wrote:Dwight Howard agrees to deal with Atlanta 3 yr/70.5 and Horford is presumably on his way out.


I'm blown away that teams don't recognize what a cancer Howard is. All the talent in the world without passion and respect for the game, no thanks. Howard is the kind of guy I believe plays the game because he likes the lifestyle and money, not because he has any passion for winning.

I could be wrong, but a man with his natural talent being on his fourth team, I doubt it.


Do be honest, it's easier to pass on a guy who has the passion combined with limited talent vs. the guy who has all the talent in the world but questionable passion. All the big time money guys believe they can change that. Can't say i disagree when it comes to an investment interest.

Re: WOJ Live: Free Agency Show

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 8:34 pm
by khans2k5 [enjin:6608728]
Can someone explain to me how in the hell the Clippers will be able to afford 4 max contracts of varying degrees and still field a full team?

Re: WOJ Live: Free Agency Show

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 8:36 pm
by TheFuture
monsterpile wrote:
TheFuture wrote:
longstrangetrip wrote:I'm really scratching my head at the Blazers giving Evan Turner $70/4. They have their starting guards, so why does $18 per year make sense for a guy to come off the bench and not shoot very well?


I'd say he's going to be their starting SF with Aminu off the bench or playing small ball 4.

2 of Harkless, Henderson, and Crabbe are likely gone with that signing. I wouldn't mind seeing Crabbe or Henderson here.

I like Turner as a player, but not at that price. With Lillard, McCollum, and Turner they have 3 very good ball handlers on the wing. All of them are playmakers who can create a shot for themselves or others. I think they'll be difficult to defend.


It's just bizarre that the Blazers have all those wings and they go out and dif another one and for a huge amount of money. I would rather have Crabbe but maybe they match him too idk. Adding Turner is weird and that's before the big contract.


Turner vs. Crabbe at this point is a no brainer in terms of talent/production, in my opinion. What comes in to question is the potential/cost for production. You can make an argument there, but i really do believe Turner will thrive in portland.

Re: WOJ Live: Free Agency Show

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 8:37 pm
by TheFuture
khans2k5 wrote:Can someone explain to me how in the hell the Clippers will be able to afford 4 max contracts of varying degrees and still field a full team?


Likely because Paul, Griffen, and Jordan are on old max deals.

Re: WOJ Live: Free Agency Show

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 8:40 pm
by Coolbreeze44
khans2k5 wrote:Can someone explain to me how in the hell the Clippers will be able to afford 4 max contracts of varying degrees and still field a full team?

Microsoft

Re: WOJ Live: Free Agency Show

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 8:48 pm
by khans2k5 [enjin:6608728]
TheFuture wrote:
khans2k5 wrote:Can someone explain to me how in the hell the Clippers will be able to afford 4 max contracts of varying degrees and still field a full team?


Likely because Paul, Griffen, and Jordan are on old max deals.


DJ, Blake and Chris still make 64 million between the 3 of them. Durant is gonna start at 26.6. That's 90.6 million of what, a 94 million dollar cap? That's 96% of the cap in 4 players and CP3's deal is up next year when he'll qualify for like a 30 million dollar/year deal. I just don't see it.

Re: WOJ Live: Free Agency Show

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 8:52 pm
by TheFuture
khans2k5 wrote:
TheFuture wrote:
khans2k5 wrote:Can someone explain to me how in the hell the Clippers will be able to afford 4 max contracts of varying degrees and still field a full team?


Likely because Paul, Griffen, and Jordan are on old max deals.


DJ, Blake and Chris still make 64 million between the 3 of them. Durant is gonna start at 26.6. That's 90.6 million of what, a 94 million dollar cap? That's 96% of the cap in 4 players and CP3's deal is up next year when he'll qualify for like a 30 million dollar/year deal. I just don't see it.


Going into the luxury tax which is like what 125mil??? Im not sure. I haven't looked at the restricted/unrestricted free agents they have, but I'd say they could find a way to do it.