OT - Making Sense of Tragedy

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
TheGrey08
Posts: 1843
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: OT - Making Sense of Tragedy

Post by TheGrey08 »

mrhockey89 wrote:TheGrey, you said
"People have also stated that they've seen inciters randomly come up and start throwing shit at police to get them to react violently, multiple instances where police all of a sudden reacted aggressively to a crowd unprovoked, numerous instances where squads shoot pepper spray on protesters not even on the roadway (my sis was walking on the grass on the side of an on ramp getting away from the 35W bridge when squads came down it spraying mace at them), so lets seriously stop trying to depict protesters as being violent and cops "just protecting themselves" because it's quite frankly bullshit."

Are you talking about right after the tanker truck came through? If so, the police stated they didn't know the intent of the truck driver at that point and were concerned the truck had the potential to explode, which seems to fit the scenario pretty well, and I'd like to think that had the truck exploded, the protesters would have appreciated being forcefully pushed away as opposed to the "hey guys, would you all get far away" option that wouldn't have moved too many people very fast. If it's another incident then maybe I missed it, but if that's the one, then I'm not feeling sorry for anyone.

I was speaking about all the numerous incidents caught on video of physical conflict between protesters and police.

As for the Truck incident, yeah they didn't know if it was a full tanker, was a terrorist attack or what. My sister was maybe 4 feet from being hit when he went into the crowd. The tanker was shown heading toward the bridge live and my mom frantically tried to get a hold of my sister to warn her. Shortly after he stopped some protesters screamed that it was a tanker and people needed to get the hell away from it. Protesters made their way up the Washington Ave exit ramp (walking in the grass) and police drove down the ramp spraying the protesters (my sister was hit by it when the first wave of patrol came through). The below vid is likely the 2nd wave of patrol that came through there:

https://twitter.com/chadloder/status/1268955152750264320?s=20
User avatar
mrhockey89
Posts: 1072
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 12:00 am

Re: OT - Making Sense of Tragedy

Post by mrhockey89 »

I'm really not too sure why Kaepernick is the focus of any of this at this point. It seems like the discussion should be moving to what can/should/will happen to create change.

This disbanding of the Minneapolis Police thing could take a lot of forms. The popular opinion is that they will exist, but with a different model than is being used today, that there will still be police being re-hired and will be able to make arrests, but with a more human touch. If you listen to the City Council talk about it, that's not how they make it sound. They make it sound like we're flat out replacing the police with neighbors/friends and mental health professionals. I sure hope that is hyperbole because that might be the worst idea I've ever heard if not. We already got a glimpse of what would happen in Minneapolis if police aren't around, and many/most businesses are still boarded up, but hey, maybe they can call a psychologist to help solve a murder or talk a criminal into returning stolen items, and I'm sure there will be lots of social workers excited to go visit an in-progress domestic dispute.

If they're smart about it, something could be done to divide up responsibilities and re-think how policing the community can be done with the help of other segments. If that's the idea, then the Minneapolis City Council really is doing an atrocious job of getting that message out. Because if I'm a store owner/resident and they don't correct this message, I'm looking at options to move out ASAP.
User avatar
AbeVigodaLive
Posts: 10272
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 am

Re: OT - Making Sense of Tragedy

Post by AbeVigodaLive »

mrhockey89 wrote:
AbeVigodaLive wrote:
Camden wrote:
AbeVigodaLive wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:
TheGrey08 wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:
TheGrey08 wrote:
Well said Khans. You went right to the heart of it and what it's truly about. Brees was just another person parroting the narrative of people trying to make kneeling during the anthem a disrespect to the military when that was never what it was about. In fact, they started kneeling as to NOT disrespect the military and it was suggested by someone in the military.

When has kneeling EVER been considered a negative or disrespectful act before the anthem kneeling happened? I honestly cannot think of any other example where kneeling was seeing as anything but respectful. CWhen has kneeling EVER been considered a negative or disrespectful act before the anthem kneeling happened? I honestly cannot think of any other example where kneeling was seeing as anything but respectful. Can anyone think of a single example prior to this?


Isn't this said every time before the national anthem is played? "Ladies and gentleman, please rise as (so and so) performs our star spangled banner". I don't know how the act of rising to our feet began, but we've been asked to do it for a century.

So I take that as you have no other example then? Cool.

PS: Your response is obviously beside the point. After all this is America where we have freedoms and there's no law saying you have to even recognize the anthem. So again I ask, can you come up with a single other instance where kneeling is seen as anything, but respectful?

I'm not trying to be confrontational here. I'm just saying that you are always asked to stand for the national anthem. So if you do something other than stand, at a minimum you're being disrespectful to the PA announcer. But no, kneeling in and of itself is not normally disrespectful, in fact it's most often the opposite. I'm sure we can figure out when it's intent is one or the other.



I'd much rather see the peaceful disrespect of a guy kneeling when it's inappropriate over massive rioting and looting.

The tricky thing is when the guy kneeling is ostracized (in part) for doing so... and the story is about him kneeling and not the injustice he was kneeling for...

So that when people really do want justice... they look back and think "Kneeling? Fuck that. That didn't work. So here's how we're going to get their attention."

And in the ironic twist... many of the same people who ripped that kneeling man now implore the looters... "Why can't you protest peacefully?"

Rinse. Repeat.


The "injustice" he was kneeling for was a bullshit narrative that painted Michael Brown out to be an innocent, law-abiding citizen when that wasn't the case when all the evidence came together. So, yeah, it's twice as hard to rally around a guy kneeling for the national anthem especially when he's uniformed -- and wrong -- in doing so.



I see where Michael Brown was ONE of SEVERAL names Kaepernick cited.

"Oscar Grant, Rekia Boyd, Michael Brown, Tamir Rice," he said, ticking off names of people killed by police in recent years. "Laquan McDonald, Sandra Bland, Freddie Gray. The Panthers' demands are still alive today because the police are still killing us today."

And then there's this article...

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/colin-kaepernick-reveals-specific-police-shooting-led-him-kneel-n1044306

Referencing Mario Woods as the catalyst event.



You forgot one, Fidel Castro, when he wore the "Like minds think alike" Fidel Castro t-shirt. Seems a bit hypocritical to simultaneously become the main champion for equal rights, while simultaneously promoting one of the biggest oppressive leaders in recent world history. To me it's akin to someone saying "I support equal rights" while wearing a t-shirt of David Duke.



I don't know anything about the Castro t-shirt. Heck, I didn't even really know the other stuff either... it was just discovered IMMEDIATELY when I fact-checked Camden's seemingly misguided post.

I remember thinking at the time that Kaepernick did multiple things that either hurt his cause or seemed to focus on himself more than anything else. But I really probably didn't pay enough attention to any of it to make any kind of realistic knowledgeable decision.

I did think he was good enough (sans the football factory meathead all rah rah team, we can't have any distractions to the team thing) to have earned a job in the NFL somewhere though.

It'll be interesting to see how it's all characterized as more time passes.
User avatar
Q12543 [enjin:6621299]
Posts: 13844
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 am

Re: OT - Making Sense of Tragedy

Post by Q12543 [enjin:6621299] »

TheGrey08 wrote:Regarding the disbanding of MPD that has been talked about.

The very same thing happened in Camden NJ. The former Camden police chief spoke about it. (he was the chief when it happened) They were treated like brand new employees that had to apply, take psych evals, etc. "The opportunity that really provided to us was the ability to build culture as opposed to changing it" After doing this they saw a 70%+ reduction in murders and 46%+ reduction in violent crime. Sounds like MPLS has a good template to go off.

https://twitter.com/igorvolsky/status/1270111875586555907?s=20


As I said earlier, I'm open minded, but "defund" is the term being used in this case, not "disband". Camden basically disbanded the Camden police department and then allowed the County to take over, which had less generous pay and fringe benefits. However, they did do the other things you mentioned and changed the culture. But it was still done within the paradigm of a funded police force and many of the same officers re-hired. By dissolving the Camden force and signing on with the County, it allowed them to bust up the union, save money, AND change the culture.
User avatar
mrhockey89
Posts: 1072
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 12:00 am

Re: OT - Making Sense of Tragedy

Post by mrhockey89 »

TheGrey08 wrote:
mrhockey89 wrote:TheGrey, you said
"People have also stated that they've seen inciters randomly come up and start throwing shit at police to get them to react violently, multiple instances where police all of a sudden reacted aggressively to a crowd unprovoked, numerous instances where squads shoot pepper spray on protesters not even on the roadway (my sis was walking on the grass on the side of an on ramp getting away from the 35W bridge when squads came down it spraying mace at them), so lets seriously stop trying to depict protesters as being violent and cops "just protecting themselves" because it's quite frankly bullshit."

Are you talking about right after the tanker truck came through? If so, the police stated they didn't know the intent of the truck driver at that point and were concerned the truck had the potential to explode, which seems to fit the scenario pretty well, and I'd like to think that had the truck exploded, the protesters would have appreciated being forcefully pushed away as opposed to the "hey guys, would you all get far away" option that wouldn't have moved too many people very fast. If it's another incident then maybe I missed it, but if that's the one, then I'm not feeling sorry for anyone.

I was speaking about all the numerous incidents caught on video of physical conflict between protesters and police.

As for the Truck incident, yeah they didn't know if it was a full tanker, was a terrorist attack or what. My sister was maybe 4 feet from being hit when he went into the crowd. The tanker was shown heading toward the bridge live and my mom frantically tried to get a hold of my sister to warn her. Shortly after he stopped some protesters screamed that it was a tanker and people needed to get the hell away from it. Protesters made their way up the Washington Ave exit ramp (walking in the grass) and police drove down the ramp spraying the protesters (my sister was hit by it when the first wave of patrol came through). The below vid is likely the 2nd wave of patrol that came through there:

https://twitter.com/chadloder/status/1268955152750264320?s=20


Fair enough. Not to make an excuse, but I'm sure they're told going into these that they can't put on their kid gloves for these 'missions'. That said, I can see people being upset by them (tough to tell if anyone did anything from those distances, but I'll give the protestors the benefit of the doubt).

I think most people agree that police reform is needed from a use of force standpoint. I don't even think that's a racial lines discussion. I also think it's likely fair to say that there are certain disadvantages inherently affecting African Americans. I think the discussions right now in the world is clearly making all of that a big focus on all policies that disadvantage people of color. I think every PD in America, many large businesses in America (maybe I'm bias since our VP and head of HR has put out several video messages/emails on the subject), cities, counties, states, and at the federal level (legislative) are all going to be looking internally at "what should we be doing that we are not." I still maintain that everyone is terrified to talk about the culture that is also a factor in some of these bias. For those who disagree on that point, I guess we'll know soon whether all these other changes make things look fair. I say until that's also addressed, things will get better but will still have a long ways to go, and will somewhat push back some of the policies. There's a lot of chicken or egg discussion, but I don't think it matters which was first because what matters is now, and what will fix things going forward. While this is a human race, there are differences in cultures inherently as well. Individually, there can be a 7'6" Chinese man, but the average height of a Chinese man is between 5'6" and 5'9". Individually you can have a Christian McCaffrey (or Ed McCaffrey for that matter) in an athletic skill position in the NFL, but there's also a reason that he's in the minorities of white players at the position. Asian cultures value collectivism, Western cultures value individualism. Look at careers even within America and you'll see different types of cultural demographics dominating various types of careers. To say black culture is more violent than other cultures isn't racist, it's what the numbers say. If you're convinced that's just the systematic oppression fine, but I think you're blinding yourself from that particular aspect to ignore it when looking for conditions to improve.

Let me give another example... I saw a cartoon about 5 years ago...a parent, a child, and a teacher in a meeting. The 1st drawing had the parent pointing at the child saying "Explain these bad grades" and like 1995 as the year. The 2nd drawing had the parents looking at the teacher saying "Explain these bad grades" and like 2015 or so as the year. Accountability in this age seems like a thing of the past. Everyone wants to blame others. While it's completely reasonable to say there needs to be more police accountability, as well a better system (and both will be changing now), we still sit here with the problem that people always want to blame the system for everything. Let me be very clear here, the system does need to improve, but the lack of accountability within today's society is also equally concerning.
User avatar
mrhockey89
Posts: 1072
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 12:00 am

Re: OT - Making Sense of Tragedy

Post by mrhockey89 »

AbeVigodaLive wrote:

I don't know anything about the Castro t-shirt. Heck, I didn't even really know the other stuff either... it was just discovered IMMEDIATELY when I fact-checked Camden's seemingly misguided post.

I remember thinking at the time that Kaepernick did multiple things that either hurt his cause or seemed to focus on himself more than anything else. But I really probably didn't pay enough attention to any of it to make any kind of realistic knowledgeable decision.

I did think he was good enough (sans the football factory meathead all rah rah team, we can't have any distractions to the team thing) to have earned a job in the NFL somewhere though.

It'll be interesting to see how it's all characterized as more time passes.


I think most people (including many teams) probably agree with you that Kaepernick was good enough to still have a job in the NFL. I do think he made a miscalculation of declining his player option the offseason after his protests, because he thought he would get more money. His problem was that he had just lost a starting job to Blaine Gabbert which basically means Kaepernick has become a high level backup/low level starter, and if you're a divisive figure that will inevitably become a distraction (if not for the players, for the fans and media) then you won't have a place in the NFL. It becomes an assets vs liabilities balance sheet for the teams. If Kaepernick had the talent of say...Pat Mahomes, he would not only have a job but be making $30+ million this season. If you're a fringe starter or backup and you want to become the center of attention on a divisive topic, you might as well pack your bags. I don't believe he was blackballed from the league, I believe he put owners and GMs in an incredibly difficult position. And to further that point, the Baltimore Ravens were planning on signing Kaepernick a few years ago until Kaepernick's girlfriend decided to go onto social media and call Baltimore's team owner a racist. Not sure about you, but if I'm the Ravens front office, I'm probably deciding no on him if that happens as well.
User avatar
TheGrey08
Posts: 1843
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: OT - Making Sense of Tragedy

Post by TheGrey08 »

mrhockey89 wrote:I'll be honest, I wasn't offended by Kaepernick's kneeling in the least, but I did think it was a terrible place for him to make that protest, because the very people that he's needing to appeal to are the very people he's offending by taking the knee. And when he loses their ears before his message can even be discussed, it's a loss.

For me personally, I was just annoyed that we couldn't even watch anything sports related without bringing politics/social issues into the the discussion. Sports is one of the few things where people can get away from the real world and rally together, and when the focal point changes to a social issue (or politics) rather than the game itself, it devalues the game itself. Some people believe that social issues and politics should be in every part of everyone's lives, but I'm not one of those people.

I'm with you in that I like that sports is a place where someone's political views don't matter because we can all come together to talk about/watch/support our favorite teams. A place where politics don't muddy the water and cause drama.

However, social issues are about the health of our society and they really shouldn't be something people have to get political about. Social justice shouldn't be a this party vs that party issue. The issue isn't political, people just make it political. Sure the political system is our best way to enact change, but it should come down to people simply asking our gov't to do the right thing and said gov't just doing without BS drama. It should be one of the obvious common ground issues that most everyone can get behind. We are only as strong as the weakest/most injured parts of our society.

PS: Gah this didn't post earlier when I meant it to lol
User avatar
TheGrey08
Posts: 1843
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: OT - Making Sense of Tragedy

Post by TheGrey08 »

Q12543 wrote:
TheGrey08 wrote:Regarding the disbanding of MPD that has been talked about.

The very same thing happened in Camden NJ. The former Camden police chief spoke about it. (he was the chief when it happened) They were treated like brand new employees that had to apply, take psych evals, etc. "The opportunity that really provided to us was the ability to build culture as opposed to changing it" After doing this they saw a 70%+ reduction in murders and 46%+ reduction in violent crime. Sounds like MPLS has a good template to go off.

https://twitter.com/igorvolsky/status/1270111875586555907?s=20


As I said earlier, I'm open minded, but "defund" is the term being used in this case, not "disband". Camden basically disbanded the Camden police department and then allowed the County to take over, which had less generous pay and fringe benefits. However, they did do the other things you mentioned and changed the culture. But it was still done within the paradigm of a funded police force and many of the same officers re-hired. By dissolving the Camden force and signing on with the County, it allowed them to bust up the union, save money, AND change the culture.

They've been talking about both locally. Specifically about wanting to rebuild it from the ground up and also wanting to allocate funds differently which includes not bogging down police with tasks that are better suited for other professionals. Everything else sounds about right. I just want them to get it right and to hopefully be a leader in change as far is major cities go.
User avatar
TheGrey08
Posts: 1843
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: OT - Making Sense of Tragedy

Post by TheGrey08 »

mrhockey89 wrote:I'm really not too sure why Kaepernick is the focus of any of this at this point. It seems like the discussion should be moving to what can/should/will happen to create change.

This disbanding of the Minneapolis Police thing could take a lot of forms. The popular opinion is that they will exist, but with a different model than is being used today, that there will still be police being re-hired and will be able to make arrests, but with a more human touch. If you listen to the City Council talk about it, that's not how they make it sound. They make it sound like we're flat out replacing the police with neighbors/friends and mental health professionals. I sure hope that is hyperbole because that might be the worst idea I've ever heard if not. We already got a glimpse of what would happen in Minneapolis if police aren't around, and many/most businesses are still boarded up, but hey, maybe they can call a psychologist to help solve a murder or talk a criminal into returning stolen items, and I'm sure there will be lots of social workers excited to go visit an in-progress domestic dispute.

If they're smart about it, something could be done to divide up responsibilities and re-think how policing the community can be done with the help of other segments. If that's the idea, then the Minneapolis City Council really is doing an atrocious job of getting that message out. Because if I'm a store owner/resident and they don't correct this message, I'm looking at options to move out ASAP.

They are referencing having officers live within the city/communities they work in and yeah the idea is having mental health professionals dealing with nonviolent incidents that don't require an armed cop showing up.
User avatar
mrhockey89
Posts: 1072
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 12:00 am

Re: OT - Making Sense of Tragedy

Post by mrhockey89 »

TheGrey08 wrote:
mrhockey89 wrote:I'll be honest, I wasn't offended by Kaepernick's kneeling in the least, but I did think it was a terrible place for him to make that protest, because the very people that he's needing to appeal to are the very people he's offending by taking the knee. And when he loses their ears before his message can even be discussed, it's a loss.

For me personally, I was just annoyed that we couldn't even watch anything sports related without bringing politics/social issues into the the discussion. Sports is one of the few things where people can get away from the real world and rally together, and when the focal point changes to a social issue (or politics) rather than the game itself, it devalues the game itself. Some people believe that social issues and politics should be in every part of everyone's lives, but I'm not one of those people.

I'm with you in that I like that sports is a place where someone's political views don't matter because we can all come together to talk about/watch/support our favorite teams. A place where politics don't muddy the water and cause drama.

However, social issues are about the health of our society and they really shouldn't be something people have to get political about. Social justice shouldn't be a this party vs that party issue. The issue isn't political, people just make it political. Sure the political system is our best way to enact change, but it should come down to people simply asking our gov't to do the right thing and said gov't just doing without BS drama. It should be one of the obvious common ground issues that most everyone can get behind. We are only as strong as the weakest/most injured parts of our society.

PS: Gah this didn't post earlier when I meant it to lol


Just like politics (and sports or even life for that matter), most people agree on the end goal, and that equal rights should exist. It's mostly trying to agree on where the actual discriminations are vs which problems are simply perceived given personal experiences and/or views. People really need to focus on what we all can agree on, rather than what divides us. That's why I think Drew Brees getting called out did nothing to help anything because there really wasn't even a disagreement on the overall goal, but rather a misunderstanding of people's differences when viewing the world. Drew sees the flag as a symbol of our freedom fought by our soldiers for which the anthem was created, while those offended by Drew's comments view the anthem with a less literal viewpoint of why it was created and instead choose to focus on what they believe it stands for in this country. Bigotry is becoming fashionable in this country when people don't see eye to eye, and that will get us nowhere when trying to unite.
Post Reply