Free agent signings

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
AbeVigodaLive
Posts: 10272
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Free agent signings

Post by AbeVigodaLive »

TheSP wrote:
AbeVigodaLive wrote:So at least we'd have that going for us.

Except that one short playoff appearance just reset the clock on the next decade of futility. Going for us? I'd say going against us!



Don't really know what changed in the grand scheme of things... depending what you think the team could have gotten back for a LaVine trade or Wiggins trade when the "Three Young Guys on the SAME Timeline" failed to produce a playoff appearance.

Doesn't the team still have a new regime? And still searching for a playoff berth.

At least we got 82 games (despite Thibs annoying yelling) of relevance amid the decades of futility on either side.
User avatar
Wolvesfan21
Posts: 4115
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2017 12:00 am

Re: Free agent signings

Post by Wolvesfan21 »

AbeVigodaLive wrote:
WolvesFan21 wrote:
Camden wrote:
WolvesFan21 wrote:
Camden wrote:
WolvesFan21 wrote:This biggest mistake in my view was not moving up for Luka. I might have been the only one pounding the table to do that though. If it took Butler and picks do it. None of the the top 3 spots that year were destination spots for star players either, especially a team like Sacramento who would be relevant again. If Thibs drafts Luka he is still here and looks like a genius to the world. Now he's in the worst coaching spot in the NBA and lucky to be there.


We were never getting Luka. We've talked about this.


Dallas traded up and did exactly that. You have no idea if any of the top 3 were interested in Jimmy or not plus pick/s.


Dallas traded up from five to three. That's a much different scenario than trying to trade up from 20 or getting a top-three pick from a team for an All-Star that none of them were prepared to build around or contend with. It's just not realistic in any way, shape, or form.

You hold on to this idea that there was a missed opportunity there for Luka, but no such opportunity realistically presented itself. That's the disconnect.


You can pretend to know but you simply cannot. I think an opportunity was there to swap picks, add Jimmy and the next years first. I know you feel strongly that none of the top 3 teams would do it, but it's purely speculation on your part and mine. In the end Thibs was not only a failure as a HC but as a POB with his terrible drafting and signings. He took the team with "the most young talent in the league" and snuck into the playoffs once and got dominated. That was a failure. Had Thibs went all in on Luka he'd still be here and be heralded as a genius.



I'm still super ticked off that the Wolves didn't figure out a way to draft Tim Duncan and Shaq. They were so stupid!!!!!


None of the top 3 wanted Luka, BIG difference. They might have wanted Butler + picks.
User avatar
TheFuture
Posts: 3000
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2014 12:00 am

Re: Free agent signings

Post by TheFuture »

AbeVigodaLive wrote:
TheSP wrote:
AbeVigodaLive wrote:So at least we'd have that going for us.

Except that one short playoff appearance just reset the clock on the next decade of futility. Going for us? I'd say going against us!



Don't really know what changed in the grand scheme of things... depending what you think the team could have gotten back for a LaVine trade or Wiggins trade when the "Three Young Guys on the SAME Timeline" failed to produce a playoff appearance.

Doesn't the team still have a new regime? And still searching for a playoff berth.

At least we got 82 games (despite Thibs annoying yelling) of relevance amid the decades of futility on either side.


I mean, they were all around 21. Not exactly the time to go all in, nor expect contention.
User avatar
TheFuture
Posts: 3000
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2014 12:00 am

Re: Free agent signings

Post by TheFuture »

WolvesFan21 wrote:
AbeVigodaLive wrote:
WolvesFan21 wrote:
Camden wrote:
WolvesFan21 wrote:
Camden wrote:
WolvesFan21 wrote:This biggest mistake in my view was not moving up for Luka. I might have been the only one pounding the table to do that though. If it took Butler and picks do it. None of the the top 3 spots that year were destination spots for star players either, especially a team like Sacramento who would be relevant again. If Thibs drafts Luka he is still here and looks like a genius to the world. Now he's in the worst coaching spot in the NBA and lucky to be there.


We were never getting Luka. We've talked about this.


Dallas traded up and did exactly that. You have no idea if any of the top 3 were interested in Jimmy or not plus pick/s.


Dallas traded up from five to three. That's a much different scenario than trying to trade up from 20 or getting a top-three pick from a team for an All-Star that none of them were prepared to build around or contend with. It's just not realistic in any way, shape, or form.

You hold on to this idea that there was a missed opportunity there for Luka, but no such opportunity realistically presented itself. That's the disconnect.


You can pretend to know but you simply cannot. I think an opportunity was there to swap picks, add Jimmy and the next years first. I know you feel strongly that none of the top 3 teams would do it, but it's purely speculation on your part and mine. In the end Thibs was not only a failure as a HC but as a POB with his terrible drafting and signings. He took the team with "the most young talent in the league" and snuck into the playoffs once and got dominated. That was a failure. Had Thibs went all in on Luka he'd still be here and be heralded as a genius.



I'm still super ticked off that the Wolves didn't figure out a way to draft Tim Duncan and Shaq. They were so stupid!!!!!


None of the top 3 wanted Luka, BIG difference. They might have wanted Butler + picks.


No team gambles that large to go get a prospect. Maybe they should, but they don't. You are talking many future picks to move up that far. For a prospect. That never happens and never will.

Dallas was coming out of the Dirk era. They had nothing. Why would they have wanted a 30 year old Butler?
User avatar
Wolvesfan21
Posts: 4115
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2017 12:00 am

Re: Free agent signings

Post by Wolvesfan21 »

TheFuture wrote:
WolvesFan21 wrote:
AbeVigodaLive wrote:
WolvesFan21 wrote:
Camden wrote:
WolvesFan21 wrote:
Camden wrote:
WolvesFan21 wrote:This biggest mistake in my view was not moving up for Luka. I might have been the only one pounding the table to do that though. If it took Butler and picks do it. None of the the top 3 spots that year were destination spots for star players either, especially a team like Sacramento who would be relevant again. If Thibs drafts Luka he is still here and looks like a genius to the world. Now he's in the worst coaching spot in the NBA and lucky to be there.


We were never getting Luka. We've talked about this.


Dallas traded up and did exactly that. You have no idea if any of the top 3 were interested in Jimmy or not plus pick/s.


Dallas traded up from five to three. That's a much different scenario than trying to trade up from 20 or getting a top-three pick from a team for an All-Star that none of them were prepared to build around or contend with. It's just not realistic in any way, shape, or form.

You hold on to this idea that there was a missed opportunity there for Luka, but no such opportunity realistically presented itself. That's the disconnect.


You can pretend to know but you simply cannot. I think an opportunity was there to swap picks, add Jimmy and the next years first. I know you feel strongly that none of the top 3 teams would do it, but it's purely speculation on your part and mine. In the end Thibs was not only a failure as a HC but as a POB with his terrible drafting and signings. He took the team with "the most young talent in the league" and snuck into the playoffs once and got dominated. That was a failure. Had Thibs went all in on Luka he'd still be here and be heralded as a genius.



I'm still super ticked off that the Wolves didn't figure out a way to draft Tim Duncan and Shaq. They were so stupid!!!!!



None of the top 3 wanted Luka, BIG difference. They might have wanted Butler + picks.


No team gambles that large to go get a prospect. Maybe they should, but they don't. You are talking many future picks to move up that far. For a prospect. That never happens and never will.

Dallas was coming out of the Dirk era. They had nothing. Why would they have wanted a 30 year old Butler?


Atlanta had the 3rd pick. Dallas traded up for Luka. Atlanta took Trae.

Butler could have potential to turn a fledgling franchise around, those like ATL, PHO or SAC. Sell tickets and give fans some hope.

As far as the Wolves trading Butler, he clearly wanted out and was about to blow the team up in daily drama. I knew he wanted out, so I said trading him PRIOR to the draft was ultimately the best solution.

Now wether a deal could have been made is purely speculative of course. Maybe none of the top 3 would take Butler. But again maybe they would have. The right thing to do was to try and I highly doubt Thibs did as he held onto Butler as long as he could. Being proactive was crucial, not being reactive and waiting for the disaster to transpire.
User avatar
TheFuture
Posts: 3000
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2014 12:00 am

Re: Free agent signings

Post by TheFuture »

WolvesFan21 wrote:
TheFuture wrote:
WolvesFan21 wrote:
AbeVigodaLive wrote:
WolvesFan21 wrote:
Camden wrote:
WolvesFan21 wrote:
Camden wrote:
WolvesFan21 wrote:This biggest mistake in my view was not moving up for Luka. I might have been the only one pounding the table to do that though. If it took Butler and picks do it. None of the the top 3 spots that year were destination spots for star players either, especially a team like Sacramento who would be relevant again. If Thibs drafts Luka he is still here and looks like a genius to the world. Now he's in the worst coaching spot in the NBA and lucky to be there.


We were never getting Luka. We've talked about this.


Dallas traded up and did exactly that. You have no idea if any of the top 3 were interested in Jimmy or not plus pick/s.


Dallas traded up from five to three. That's a much different scenario than trying to trade up from 20 or getting a top-three pick from a team for an All-Star that none of them were prepared to build around or contend with. It's just not realistic in any way, shape, or form.

You hold on to this idea that there was a missed opportunity there for Luka, but no such opportunity realistically presented itself. That's the disconnect.


You can pretend to know but you simply cannot. I think an opportunity was there to swap picks, add Jimmy and the next years first. I know you feel strongly that none of the top 3 teams would do it, but it's purely speculation on your part and mine. In the end Thibs was not only a failure as a HC but as a POB with his terrible drafting and signings. He took the team with "the most young talent in the league" and snuck into the playoffs once and got dominated. That was a failure. Had Thibs went all in on Luka he'd still be here and be heralded as a genius.



I'm still super ticked off that the Wolves didn't figure out a way to draft Tim Duncan and Shaq. They were so stupid!!!!!



None of the top 3 wanted Luka, BIG difference. They might have wanted Butler + picks.


No team gambles that large to go get a prospect. Maybe they should, but they don't. You are talking many future picks to move up that far. For a prospect. That never happens and never will.

Dallas was coming out of the Dirk era. They had nothing. Why would they have wanted a 30 year old Butler?


Atlanta had the 3rd pick. Dallas traded up for Luka. Atlanta took Trae.

Butler could have potential to turn a fledgling franchise around, those like ATL, PHO or SAC. Sell tickets and give fans some hope.

As far as the Wolves trading Butler, he clearly wanted out and was about to blow the team up in daily drama. I knew he wanted out, so I said trading him PRIOR to the draft was ultimately the best solution.

Now wether a deal could have been made is purely speculative of course. Maybe none of the top 3 would take Butler. But again maybe they would have. The right thing to do was to try and I highly doubt Thibs did as he held onto Butler as long as he could. Being proactive was crucial, not being reactive and waiting for the disaster to transpire.


I highly doubt it was likely to get into the top 3 that year.

But I will agree that I do not think Thibs operated the trade of Jimmy well. He did not feel out the market value, sunk his teeth into a few players, and settled. That is why he never should have been a POBO.
User avatar
Camden [enjin:6601484]
Posts: 18065
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Free agent signings

Post by Camden [enjin:6601484] »

It should be noted that Tom Thibodeau was not the one who pulled the trigger on sending Jimmy Butler to Philadelphia. Glen Taylor basically removed him from his front office role and it was Scott Layden who was the one leading that front. We'll never actually know for sure what kind of a deal Thibs could have made for Butler or if Thibs could have de-escalated the situation because Taylor interfered. If your argument is that Thibs should have traded Butler in the off-season after the playoff series with Houston, then that's different and fair argument. I just want to remind people that Minnesota's owner did not allow Thibs to extract the most value possible out of Butler when it was decided that Butler wanted out.
User avatar
Wolvesfan21
Posts: 4115
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2017 12:00 am

Re: Free agent signings

Post by Wolvesfan21 »

Camden wrote:It should be noted that Tom Thibodeau was not the one who pulled the trigger on sending Jimmy Butler to Philadelphia. Glen Taylor basically removed him from his front office role and it was Scott Layden who was the one leading that front. We'll never actually know for sure what kind of a deal Thibs could have made for Butler or if Thibs could have de-escalated the situation because Taylor interfered. If your argument is that Thibs should have traded Butler in the off-season after the playoff series with Houston, then that's different and fair argument. I just want to remind people that Minnesota's owner did not allow Thibs to extract the most value possible out of Butler when it was decided that Butler wanted out.


I think it was Lip and I who after the playoffs said trade Butler now. Everyone else was against it as I recall. To me it didn't look like it was working out or going to work out. Maybe the way they interacted with each other, etc. Well the rest is history.
User avatar
mrhockey89
Posts: 1072
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Free agent signings

Post by mrhockey89 »

Camden wrote:It should be noted that Tom Thibodeau was not the one who pulled the trigger on sending Jimmy Butler to Philadelphia. Glen Taylor basically removed him from his front office role and it was Scott Layden who was the one leading that front. We'll never actually know for sure what kind of a deal Thibs could have made for Butler or if Thibs could have de-escalated the situation because Taylor interfered. If your argument is that Thibs should have traded Butler in the off-season after the playoff series with Houston, then that's different and fair argument. I just want to remind people that Minnesota's owner did not allow Thibs to extract the most value possible out of Butler when it was decided that Butler wanted out.


Given how that offseason ended and how his trade demands were basically outed by a Chicago reporter at the end of an offseason where Butler reportedly indicated he wanted out months earlier and that there was bad blood, I still would classify this as a Thibs failure to not handle his duties, whether that be to talk to Butler to settle him down and bring him back in the fold, or whether it be to trade him when we had max leverage. By the time Taylor was involved, Butler was a pure cancer and needed to go.
User avatar
Lipoli390
Posts: 16253
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Free agent signings

Post by Lipoli390 »

Camden wrote:It should be noted that Tom Thibodeau was not the one who pulled the trigger on sending Jimmy Butler to Philadelphia. Glen Taylor basically removed him from his front office role and it was Scott Layden who was the one leading that front. We'll never actually know for sure what kind of a deal Thibs could have made for Butler or if Thibs could have de-escalated the situation because Taylor interfered. If your argument is that Thibs should have traded Butler in the off-season after the playoff series with Houston, then that's different and fair argument. I just want to remind people that Minnesota's owner did not allow Thibs to extract the most value possible out of Butler when it was decided that Butler wanted out.


Cam -

I'm not going to defend Glen Taylor. His hiring decisions have been consistently horrible. But as Jon K noted in a recent article, Glen Taylor has not been a meddler. I trust Jon and what Jon reported is also consistent with what I've heard from people in the Wolves organization I've known over the years. If Glen were inclined to intervene, the Wolves never would have traded Rubio - that's just one example. And even if Glen stepped in on occasion, something that occurred rarely if ever, he had nothing to do with the Butler fiasco and I say that with complete confidence based on people I talked to in the Wolves organization after Thibodeau was gone.

The Butler debacle was entirely on Thibodeau. Glen Taylor intervened only because Thibodeau was refusing to deal Butler - often in a pass-aggressive way by changing the terms of a deal tentatively agreed to and, thereby, tanking the deal. I've learned a lot about Thibodeau from people I know inside the organization. He was a complete jackass and, in this instance, he was borderline delusional, believing the whole thing would blow over. He absolutely refused to give up on the guy, Butler, who he brought here in his signature move as PBO. So Glen had Layden step in and Scott made the best deal he thought he could make with no interference from Glen.

Given the parade of amazingly dumb decisions we've seen from this organization over the years, I think there's a tendency to assume that Glen must have interfered. I mean, how else could this organization be so consistently bad for so long. Well, the answer is simple. Glen Taylor has made consistently horrible front office hiring decisions. His best hire was actually his first, Kevin McHale. Then he stayed too long with Kevin before making one bad hiring decision after another. If anything, there were times when Glen should have intervened and said no. For example, he should have said no to the illegal Joe Smith deal when McHale brought it to him.

As for Butler, Thibodeau took a calculated risk trading for him. I disagreed with the decision at the time because Butler seemed like a bad fit next to our two 21 year olds. But I didn't hate the deal because I understood the potential upside of bringing in a talent and tough competitor like Jimmy. It was a misjudgment viewed with hindsight. But Thibodeau's handling of the situation leading up to Butler's departure was brazen mismanagement by a guy whose temperament and judgment were entirely ill-suited to the position he was in. Ultimately Glen Taylor is to blame for hiring Thibodeau into that position.
Post Reply