Facu Campazzo

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
kekgeek
Posts: 14526
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Facu Campazzo

Post by kekgeek »

lipoli390 wrote:
Camden wrote:
monsterpile wrote:
Camden wrote:
monsterpile wrote:
Camden wrote:As long as he doesn't get minutes over J-Mac I'm good with it.


If this guy plays well enough to deserve minutes I might be ok with it but I do want J-mac to play.


McLaughlin has some Patty Mills, Frank VanVleet in him. It'd be an absolute shame if the Wolves let him walk or brought someone in to surpass him in the rotation. That's just my take. He's a keeper.


Jon K said a few weeks ago that the Wolves love J-Mac but were looking to add a vet PG to the mix. That makes sense I mean we love J-mac but its possible he isn't actually any good and they would be left with nothing at the backup PG position. I get no sense they are going to let him walk this year at least. Remember there are a few people in the organization that were with him when he was with the Nets the previous season. I think he is a keeper too. It will be interesting to see what they do with 2 way contracts.

Here is a question for you thats kinda off topic but just occurred to me looking at the roster and contracts. would you rather keep Spellman or resign Jauncho? For the resign it can be whatever you want it to be. Spellman could be a fallback option in case someone throws dumb money at Juancho. Also would you pick up the team option for Spellman for the 2021-2022 season for 3.5 million? I like both guys for different reasons if the price is right. Spellman does seem a lot like Naz but I think he is more of guy that can play more as a PF than Naz though.


That would be odd if J-Mac wasn't any good based on what he showed last year. He was too productive and way too efficient especially as a rookie. I'd go as far as saying that he was our second or third best player some nights, though I admit that's not saying a ton for a team that finished 19-45. But it does indicate that he's probably a solid rotation player. I also think he'll be cheap to bring back, which adds to the positives. I'd love for Rosas to lock him up on a deal similar to Naz Reid's.

And man, it would definitely come down to the dollars for me. I like Omari Spellman more than the next guy it seems, and while I think Juan Hernangomez brings some legit value to the Wolves I believe he's a player you don't want to overpay because he's very much replaceable.

If I had it my way, I'd choose neither and allocate their money towards Jerami Grant, but assuming the Wolves get outbid there I'd take Hernangomez on a three-year, $18-million deal -- or just under what Nemanja Bjelica got from the Kings.


Regarding J-Mac, I'll add that he was a key to the Wolves two signature wins following the trade deadline, i.e., the home win over the Clippers and the road win over Miami. In fact, he made the two winning offensive plays down the stretch against Miami. And Russell didn't play in the game against the Clippers. J-Mac's quickness and savvy are qualities the Wolves desperately need. I do see J-Mac as our VanVleet.


I agree I think J-Mac is legit good. Just feel like there has to be a decent amount of roster turnover. Currently Wolves have 3 open roster sports (hernangomez, Beasley, Turner). If the wolves are signing Facu and resigning Beasley. That is one roster spot for 3 draft picks, jmac, any other free agent or hernangomez.

Of course there will be roster turnover but not many current spots available for the Wolves
User avatar
WildWolf2813
Posts: 3467
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Facu Campazzo

Post by WildWolf2813 »

For a team as bad as this one, I'm not getting attached to anyone on this team, especially McLaughlin.

This team has 3 cracks at adding someone who will absolutely be better than him. If this past season allows McLaughlin to find another gig in the NBA, cool, but this team can upgrade over him. If that's Campazzo, so be it. Not expecting much from him if he does come over, but do you guys think we're gonna add 2 guards from the draft, keep Okogie, Culver, Nowell, and maybe Beasley and still think there's somehow room for McLaughlin?
User avatar
Lipoli390
Posts: 16259
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Facu Campazzo

Post by Lipoli390 »

Kekgeek - You're right about the limited roster space and likely roster turnover. If they sign Facu, they limit their roster flexibility and ability to keep J-Mac.
User avatar
kekgeek
Posts: 14526
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Facu Campazzo

Post by kekgeek »

I don't know much about Facundo. Here are some snippets I've read about him.

-5'11 (Every site but one lists him at 5'11, i haven't found 5'9 again)

- Mavs, Spurs and Wolves have shown interest and Wolves considered favorite

- 2nd on the team in minutes on a silver medalist team at the world cup

- plays on a really good Real Madrid team, former luka teammate

-Eurocup defensive player of the year

-NBA comp is barea

-37.5% 3pt shooting in Euroleague, but he has had really down years in shooting, shooting 31% in a year.

-Best skill is his passing, apparently one of the best passers in the world. Elite vision.

- has struggled finishing around the rim.
User avatar
Camden [enjin:6601484]
Posts: 18065
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Facu Campazzo

Post by Camden [enjin:6601484] »

I wouldn't consider Jacob Evans, Omari Spellman, or Jarred Vanderbilt to be locks on this roster right now. I'd also ditch any of the three in order to keep Jordan McLaughlin around.

G: D'Angelo Russell, Jordan McLaughlin
W: Malik Beasley, Josh Okogie, Jaylen Nowell, [s]Evan Turner[/s]
W: Jake Layman, Jarrett Culver, [s]Kelan Martin[/s], [s]Jacob Evans[/s]
F: Juan Hernangomez, James Johnson, Jarred Vanderbilt
C: Karl-Anthony Towns, Naz Reid, Omari Spellman

Letting Martin and Turner walk are obvious moves, and waiving/trading Evans is on the horizon. That would leave the Wolves at 13 players with two open roster spots, assuming Minnesota brought back all of Beasley, Hernangomez, and McLaughlin. Those could be used on the number one and 17 overall picks. Maybe they'll be used on a pick and a player acquired via trade. Maybe they'll use both to acquire a player and sign Facundo Campazzo. They have some wiggle room, though.
User avatar
Q12543 [enjin:6621299]
Posts: 13844
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Facu Campazzo

Post by Q12543 [enjin:6621299] »

Well, I'm a Jarred Vanderbilt fanboy in that he has the potential to be our swiss-army knife power forward that could be very productive without having to take a lot of shots. I don't know if he'll pan out or not, but he's too tantalizing of a skill-set to give up on - far more compelling than Hernangomez in my opinion. In fact, James Johnson might be the perfect mentor for Vanderbilt.

I still think we're overloaded on SGs and we don't have enough SFs. Beasley, Okogie, Culver, Nowell, and Evans are all "natural" SGs. Layman might be our only true SF on the roster.
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 24064
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Facu Campazzo

Post by Monster »

Camden0916 wrote:I wouldn't consider Jacob Evans, Omari Spellman, or Jarred Vanderbilt to be locks on this roster right now. I'd also ditch any of the three in order to keep Jordan McLaughlin around.

G: D'Angelo Russell, Jordan McLaughlin
W: Malik Beasley, Josh Okogie, Jaylen Nowell, [s]Evan Turner[/s]
W: Jake Layman, Jarrett Culver, [s]Kelan Martin[/s], [s]Jacob Evans[/s]
F: Juan Hernangomez, James Johnson, Jarred Vanderbilt
C: Karl-Anthony Towns, Naz Reid, Omari Spellman

Letting Martin and Turner walk are obvious moves, and waiving/trading Evans is on the horizon. That would leave the Wolves at 13 players with two open roster spots, assuming Minnesota brought back all of Beasley, Hernangomez, and McLaughlin. Those could be used on the number one and 17 overall picks. Maybe they'll be used on a pick and a player acquired via trade. Maybe they'll use both to acquire a player and sign Facundo Campazzo. They have some wiggle room, though.


There is a simple way to keep J-Mac under team control. Keep him on a 2-way deal. I doubt they do that (He has earned better) but they certainly could do it and really if J-Mac is the guy we think he is that's just temporary as he will end up on the roster On an actual contract one way or another Him staying on a 2-way is still actually a pretty good opportunity and a decent paycheck.
User avatar
Camden [enjin:6601484]
Posts: 18065
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Facu Campazzo

Post by Camden [enjin:6601484] »

J-Mac quite clearly outplayed a two-way deal and needs to be given an NBA contract. I don't see him settling for less nor do I see another NBA team allowing him to sneak under the radar again.
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 24064
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Facu Campazzo

Post by Monster »

Camden0916 wrote:J-Mac quite clearly outplayed a two-way deal and needs to be given an NBA contract. I don't see him settling for less nor do I see another NBA team allowing him to sneak under the radar again.


Cam a player on a 2-way deal I'm J-Mac's position is a RFA. The ONLY contract a team can offer him to sign him away from the wolves is...a 2-way contract. The reality is unless he basically refuses to play for an NBA team the Wolves COULD simply hold his rights as a 2-way player next season. I don't expect that to happen but it's just another reason why I don't think there is any way he is going anywhere. He is clearly ahead of Spellman and Evans and obviously Martin. Vanderbilt...idk they seem to like him. I like him in theory.

The other question is how do they value that option of signing another2-way guy with J-mac's spot. I think it will be a little interesting to see what they do with Martin. Do they sign him to any type of deal? Keep him on a 2-way? Give him some money to be an affiliate player? Martin I'm not that concerned about but I find it interesting. I think he is worth keeping around in some way but I wouldn't keep a roster spot including a 2-way for him but I wouldn't be Completely against it. I'd guess there will be more intriguing names out there to sign a 2-way deal but Martin does also weirdly keep seeming like he sort of belongs...and the Wolves have likes 20,000 wings.
User avatar
Camden [enjin:6601484]
Posts: 18065
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Facu Campazzo

Post by Camden [enjin:6601484] »

monsterpile wrote:
Camden0916 wrote:J-Mac quite clearly outplayed a two-way deal and needs to be given an NBA contract. I don't see him settling for less nor do I see another NBA team allowing him to sneak under the radar again.


Cam a player on a 2-way deal I'm J-Mac's position is a RFA. The ONLY contract a team can offer him to sign him away from the wolves is...a 2-way contract. The reality is unless he basically refuses to play for an NBA team the Wolves COULD simply hold his rights as a 2-way player next season. I don't expect that to happen but it's just another reason why I don't think there is any way he is going anywhere. He is clearly ahead of Spellman and Evans and obviously Martin. Vanderbilt...idk they seem to like him. I like him in theory.

The other question is how do they value that option of signing another2-way guy with J-mac's spot. I think it will be a little interesting to see what they do with Martin. Do they sign him to any type of deal? Keep him on a 2-way? Give him some money to be an affiliate player? Martin I'm not that concerned about but I find it interesting. I think he is worth keeping around in some way but I wouldn't keep a roster spot including a 2-way for him but I wouldn't be Completely against it. I'd guess there will be more intriguing names out there to sign a 2-way deal but Martin does also weirdly keep seeming like he sort of belongs...and the Wolves have likes 20,000 wings.


You're only half right here, monster. Yes, J-Mac will be a restricted free agent. The new team would have to offer at least a two-year offer sheet to the restricted free agent in order to pry him away from my understanding. That's certainly feasible for a player that showed as much promise and production as a reserve as J-Mac last season.
Post Reply