Page 3 of 4

Re: Adding a wing

Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2017 1:05 pm
by thedoper
Q12543 wrote:
thedoper wrote:I hesitant about Dudley because Phoenix could only find 20 mins for him. I just don't see how we're going to squeeze out some more value out of him when he couldn't find a meaningful role on a team that had less wings than we do. I assume he is going downhill in his athleticism at this point in his career. If the solution for this team is just a back up wing then lets go for it. I just think we need more.


But I don't really think we need another "full-time" wing. We need a bigger wing that can start halves OR play meaningful minutes off the bench, but to me it looks like 20-25 MPG once LaVine is back at full strength. That's why Tucker, Thabo, Dudley, Ingles, Roberson, and Simmons all seem like reasonable options (some better than others). But Wiggins and LaVine probably play the majority of most 4th quarters together.

Power Forward is a little different. I can see the need for a 30+ MPG PF like Milsap, Ibaka, or JaMychal Green. I'm just not sure we're going to be able to land one of those guys.


I get it. I guess my singular focus has been at PF because it is such a glaring hole. I like your Ingles idea better than Dudley. Maybe I'm not giving him enough credit but Dudley seems like he's moving more toward the end of bench vet role. Like would he be this year's Bradon Rush or does he have significantly more to offer where he would be slotted?

Re: Adding a wing

Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2017 1:14 pm
by Mr. Brightside [enjin:16464947]
Q12543 wrote:Yes, we need to be a better 3-point shooting team, but it seems to me that if we're ranked 10th in offensive efficiency and 27th in defensive efficiency then the priority for improvement is pretty obvious.

That being said, I really like the idea of going hard after Joe Ingles. He seems to be "the best of all worlds" option: He's a big wing that can start at SF. He's unselfish, defends, has above average handles, and is a very good 3-point shooter, even though it's not in mega-volume.

It seems like Utah is going to have their hands full this offseason. They need to try to retain Gordon Hayward, and if they don't, they need to find a scorer on the open market to help backfill him. They will also likely lose George Hill to free agency unless they give him a big pay day. And again, if he leaves, is Exum really they answer? They may need to go spend big money on a free agent PG or re-up Hill for big money.

So with all of that, how high are they willing to go to retain Ingles? And what other teams might target him?


RFAs are so tricky with the cap hold and the waiting period for the other team to respond. Its also rare to see RFAs change teams. Over the past 6 seasons, here's a list of RFA's that have switched teams (per spotrac):

2016: Dellavedova, Troy Daniels, Boban Marjanovic and Christian Wood.

2015: Kyle O'Quinn, Derrick Williams

2014: Chandler Parsons

2013: Tyreke Evans, Chris Copeland, Jeff Ayres

2012: Omer Asik, Jeremy Lin, Landry Fields, Greg Stiemsma, Donte Green

2011: Dante Cunningham, Derrick Brown, Chris Johnson

That's it. It just doesn't happen much, specifically with high profile players and, really, even mid-tier guys. So while the idea of signing an RFA seems like a good idea, they seem to rarely change teams. Plus, more times than not, there is an overpay factor.

As for Ingles, I'll pass on a guy who is coming off a career year at 29 years old. I also think his defense is overrated a bit as he's covered up nicely by Gobert on the inside.

Re: Adding a wing

Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2017 1:30 pm
by Monster
Mr. Brightside wrote:
Q12543 wrote:Yes, we need to be a better 3-point shooting team, but it seems to me that if we're ranked 10th in offensive efficiency and 27th in defensive efficiency then the priority for improvement is pretty obvious.

That being said, I really like the idea of going hard after Joe Ingles. He seems to be "the best of all worlds" option: He's a big wing that can start at SF. He's unselfish, defends, has above average handles, and is a very good 3-point shooter, even though it's not in mega-volume.

It seems like Utah is going to have their hands full this offseason. They need to try to retain Gordon Hayward, and if they don't, they need to find a scorer on the open market to help backfill him. They will also likely lose George Hill to free agency unless they give him a big pay day. And again, if he leaves, is Exum really they answer? They may need to go spend big money on a free agent PG or re-up Hill for big money.

So with all of that, how high are they willing to go to retain Ingles? And what other teams might target him?


RFAs are so tricky with the cap hold and the waiting period for the other team to respond. Its also rare to see RFAs change teams. Over the past 6 seasons, here's a list of RFA's that have switched teams (per spotrac):

2016: Dellavedova, Troy Daniels, Boban Marjanovic and Christian Wood.

2015: Kyle O'Quinn, Derrick Williams

2014: Chandler Parsons

2013: Tyreke Evans, Chris Copeland, Jeff Ayres

2012: Omer Asik, Jeremy Lin, Landry Fields, Greg Stiemsma, Donte Green

2011: Dante Cunningham, Derrick Brown, Chris Johnson

That's it. It just doesn't happen much, specifically with high profile players and, really, even mid-tier guys. So while the idea of signing an RFA seems like a good idea, they seem to rarely change teams. Plus, more times than not, there is an overpay factor.

As for Ingles, I'll pass on a guy who is coming off a career year at 29 years old. I also think his defense is overrated a bit as he's covered up nicely by Gobert on the inside.


Good rundown. One thing to consider is the waiting period between when a guy signs an offer to when the team has to decide whether to match or not is now 2 days compared to the 3 days it was previously.

Re: Adding a wing

Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2017 1:35 pm
by kekgeek
I am just wondering, rumor is that the Blazers are willing to add a 1st if teams take salary off their hands.

I have thought about it and wouldn't something like Crabbe, aminu and a 1st for j. Hill (non-gauranteed) and a couple of future 2nds not be the worst thing in the world.

Hear me out Crabbe, Aminu and the 1st would be about 26 mil of our 29 mil in cap. Now Crabbe is a big contact 18 mil to 19 Mil over the next 3 years but he is a volume productive 3 pt shooter who can start if need be, can play both sg/sf spots. Then aminu is a great 3 and D guy who can play small ball 4. Only have 7 mil in both of the next 2 years.

Can we realistically get 2 better players for 25 mil in free agency. We also would get a 1st where that player can play in the D-League or can fit a role.

So an offseason of Crabbe, aminu, issac (#7 hopefully) and then a late 1st.

Pg: Rubio/Dunn/Tyus
SG: Wiggins/Lavine/Crabbe
Sf: Aminu/Crabbe/Wiggins
Pf: Gorgui/belly/Issac/aminu
C: Towns/gorgui/cole.
*late 1st in there also

One downside is we get Portland out cap hell but I bet a team will help then out like Brooklyn anyways.

I just don't think we get better young talent for 26 mil via free agency

Re: Adding a wing

Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2017 2:01 pm
by Monster
longstrangetrip wrote:Good thread idea, Brightside...I agree that the off-season decision making in this area is vital.

I take a different perspective and see defense as a higher priority than shooting. Our 3-point shooting is a mystery to me, and I think it may have more to do with offensive philosophy than shooting ability. I have pointed out before that during the last half of 2015-6, the Wolves ranked 3rd in 3-point accuracy. And yet despite having guys who can make shots at a high percentage, we ranked dead last in 3-point attempts last season! How can a team that has demonstrated such proficiency in making 3-pointers the previous season not make that shot the cornerstone of the offense in the following season?

I don't know who to blame for this, because the lack of three point attempts has been an issue for awhile. Could it be Rubio, since he directs the offense? I don't know. But I tend to put the blame in this area on the coaching staff. Flip and Sam were much maligned for designing their offense around the long 2, and we had a lot of hope that Thibs would change that. But his offense is as antiquated as his predecessors, and as a result we took 1.4 fewer threes than the second 3-avoiding team last year, despite making them at a respectable 35% rate. (As we all know, a 35% rate on threes is equal to a 52.5% rate on twos). Zach, Wig, Ricky, KAT, Rush, Jones and even Gorgui are all capable of hitting the open three, if they are just given the opportunity. (And Isaac will be a good 3-point shooter too if we are lucky enough to get him in the draft). But Thibs' offense is designed more to create one-on-one matchups or to stay in the PnR, and as a result we only took 21 threes per game last season. That's not a winning formula in today's NBA.

I want to see Thibs target a gritty defending SF in free agency. Someone like PJ Tucker instantly makes us a better defensive team, allows Wig to play SG, gives us a huge scoring and shooting option off the bench in Zach, adds some vital veteran leadership to the locker room, and gives us another guy who will hit the 3-point shot at better than the league average.

But even more importantly, I hope Thibs is looking at the stats and questioning why his team is dead last in 3-point attempts. And I hope he looks in the mirror rather than blaming it on personnel, because I see him as no better than Flip or Sam in emphasizing the three...and perhaps worse. He needs to be looking at how other teams create open threes in today's NBA, and be prepared to model his offense after the teams that are doing this successfully. If he does this, I'm convinced our offense will be instantly improved as we move away from the long 2 philosophy we have all grown tired of. It's the coach's responsibility to catch up to the rest of the league and make this happen.


Well LST if you were better able to look past your Thibs bias you might have a pretty easy time figuring out a few of your own questions. I'll try and help you out. :)

There is a big difference between guys that hit 3's at a high percentage and guys that also take them at volume. The Wolves simply have very few of those volume guys and Lavine missed over 30 games this year.

Your thoughts here forget to mention that the Wolves took over 4 3's per game more than last year were more efficient as an offense (which Q pointed out) and also hit a higher percentage of 3's than last year's team. The league simply moved the goal posts again on the Wolves when it came to 3 point attempts. Where the Wolves and Thibs good enough to keep up? No.

Let's be honest about this roster. The Wolves added Rush to this roster as a 3 point shooter. That's it. Let's remind ourselves that Martin played for this team for 30 games last year and that was early on so basically this team had very little if any help adding to the roster when it came to 3 point shooting. So what realistic improvement in that area can you ask for?

Compare that to the Bucks who increased their attempts from the bottom (lower than the Wolves) to the low 20's ranking with a large jump of 8 more 3 pointers attempted. Kidd is an offensive genius for such a big jump right? Probably not. Look at the guys they added to their roster.

Delly
Teletovic
Snell (dumped MCW who didn't take them)
Brogdon
Jason Terry

They even traded Miles Plumblee for Hawes in a mid season trade who took a few 3's.

Now a couple of guys that were on their team took and made 3's that these guys replaced but they combined for like 100 games played or something

Bayless
Vasquez
Mayo

In addition to upgrading their 3 point shooting on their roster by adding players they also were getting a lot more 3 point shootinf out of Parker when he was healthy. The Bucks are an example of a team with significantly more 3 point shooting on their roster this year than they had the previous year. They got a bit lucky with some guys exceeding expectations but they were clearly looking to surround some of their guys with more shooting.

The Rockets took 10 more 3's per game. Why? They wanted to but adding Ryan Anderson and Gordon plus those guys actually staying mostly healthy was a big factor in those numbers going up. You simply can't ignore the roster when talking about 3 point attempts.

So does Thibs need to try and find more ways to get the 3 into his offense? Sure he probably would tell you they absolutely need to get up and make more 3's. Is it just him being stubborn and not making that happen because of his offense? No but everyone would agree that for whatever reason there was a lot of ISO stuff. Sometimes that made sense to do. Sometimes more passing obviously makes more sense. However a lot of that is the roster and when Lavine went down it only got worse because of spacing.

The development of the 3 point shot for this team needs to continue not only from adding to the rosters like other NBA teams have done but also inprovement from within. Wiggins is the biggest highlight of the guys that improved because not only did he shoot a decent percentage but he increased his volume some. Most of the young players increased either in volume or percentage or both. We have a ways to go but there were some actual encouraging signs. Another vet volume shooter would be really nifty especially when you have a couple guards like Rubio and Dunn who are question marks now although they COULD end up being part of the solution instead of being part of the problem.

If you want more defense from a wing player that's fine with me I know you really value defense. To me we just need more depth and we just need to add some good players although we can't just add talent it does need to fit.

Edit:

I'm certainly not saying Thibs or his offense isn't part of the problem. LST and Kahns laid out some problems that are legit but I just see the roster especially once Lavine and then Belly out was pretty ill equipped to play the type of offensive game pretty much everyone and their mom and their cat would like to see from this team.

Re: Adding a wing

Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2017 2:14 pm
by Monster
kekgeek1 wrote:I am just wondering, rumor is that the Blazers are willing to add a 1st if teams take salary off their hands.

I have thought about it and wouldn't something like Crabbe, aminu and a 1st for j. Hill (non-gauranteed) and a couple of future 2nds not be the worst thing in the world.

Hear me out Crabbe, Aminu and the 1st would be about 26 mil of our 29 mil in cap. Now Crabbe is a big contact 18 mil to 19 Mil over the next 3 years but he is a volume productive 3 pt shooter who can start if need be, can play both sg/sf spots. Then aminu is a great 3 and D guy who can play small ball 4. Only have 7 mil in both of the next 2 years.

Can we realistically get 2 better players for 25 mil in free agency. We also would get a 1st where that player can play in the D-League or can fit a role.

So an offseason of Crabbe, aminu, issac (#7 hopefully) and then a late 1st.

Pg: Rubio/Dunn/Tyus
SG: Wiggins/Lavine/Crabbe
Sf: Aminu/Crabbe/Wiggins
Pf: Gorgui/belly/Issac/aminu
C: Towns/gorgui/cole.
*late 1st in there also

One downside is we get Portland out cap hell but I bet a team will help then out like Brooklyn anyways.

I just don't think we get better young talent for 26 mil via free agency


I've said this before but if Portland really wanted to trade Crabbe someone would take him. He quietly ended up having an even better shooting year than he had before. He can actually handle the ball also. It's very possible he is a legit 2 way starting wing in this league. That makes him worth his contract plus he is young.

Like someone else said in another thread what contracts are the Blazers actually willing looking to move? My guess is they would like to move Evan Turner. Leonard might be a guy they would like to move now also because they have better players with Nurkic and Vonleh seemingly emerging. If the Wolves didn't need shooting so bad Turner wouldn't be completely terrible because the guy can play but he is overpaid. The thing is some wings that have his kind of impact will get over 10 million this offseason. I might rather have him than say Leonard because even though I never have been a big Turner fan like I said the guy can actually play and has played legit minutes for playoff teams. If you really thought you could get a good player with a 1st round pick and you were a team with plenty of shooting and also were worried about what you could actually get in FA then adding Turner might not be the worst idea ever. I can't think of a team with that situation though it certainly isn't the Wolves. Meyers Leonard? He may still have potential but he might be a worse version of Spencer Hawes which in this modern NBA means he would be unplayable.

My guess is that if the Blazers can sucker someone into taking a guy that they can live without and save a bunch of LUX money while just giving up a 1st then yeah why not since they have 3 of them. It's unlikely that one of those guys they could pick is worth however many millions of dollars it will cost the Blazers. The problem is teams may not want to add one of those guys on contracts till after they actually know where they are in FA.

If the Blazers are willing to move Aminu? I'll take him they don't even have to give me anything.

Re: Adding a wing

Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2017 6:59 pm
by Porckchop
Contending teams pickup small pieces like Rush and Aldrich to fill small minutes from time to time. Those teams are contenders with or without them. The Wolves need to pick up actual difference makers to help get them to the playoffs. A 31 win team bargain shopping for end of the benchers will net them next to nothing in the win column. Step up and make a move that actually improves them in the present and worry about the future later.

Re: Adding a wing

Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2017 8:05 pm
by KiwiMatt
PorkChop wrote:Contending teams pickup small pieces like Rush and Aldrich to fill small minutes from time to time. Those teams are contenders with or without them. The Wolves need to pick up actual difference makers to help get them to the playoffs. A 31 win team bargain shopping for end of the benchers will net them next to nothing in the win column. Step up and make a move that actually improves them in the present and worry about the future later.


The improvement of this team needs to come from the development of KAT, Wiggins and LaVine not depend on the signing of big name a FA. Not yet anyway.

Re: Adding a wing

Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2017 9:34 pm
by Q12543 [enjin:6621299]
Mr. Brightside wrote:
Q12543 wrote:Yes, we need to be a better 3-point shooting team, but it seems to me that if we're ranked 10th in offensive efficiency and 27th in defensive efficiency then the priority for improvement is pretty obvious.

That being said, I really like the idea of going hard after Joe Ingles. He seems to be "the best of all worlds" option: He's a big wing that can start at SF. He's unselfish, defends, has above average handles, and is a very good 3-point shooter, even though it's not in mega-volume.

It seems like Utah is going to have their hands full this offseason. They need to try to retain Gordon Hayward, and if they don't, they need to find a scorer on the open market to help backfill him. They will also likely lose George Hill to free agency unless they give him a big pay day. And again, if he leaves, is Exum really they answer? They may need to go spend big money on a free agent PG or re-up Hill for big money.

So with all of that, how high are they willing to go to retain Ingles? And what other teams might target him?


RFAs are so tricky with the cap hold and the waiting period for the other team to respond. Its also rare to see RFAs change teams. Over the past 6 seasons, here's a list of RFA's that have switched teams (per spotrac):

2016: Dellavedova, Troy Daniels, Boban Marjanovic and Christian Wood.

2015: Kyle O'Quinn, Derrick Williams

2014: Chandler Parsons

2013: Tyreke Evans, Chris Copeland, Jeff Ayres

2012: Omer Asik, Jeremy Lin, Landry Fields, Greg Stiemsma, Donte Green

2011: Dante Cunningham, Derrick Brown, Chris Johnson

That's it. It just doesn't happen much, specifically with high profile players and, really, even mid-tier guys. So while the idea of signing an RFA seems like a good idea, they seem to rarely change teams. Plus, more times than not, there is an overpay factor.

As for Ingles, I'll pass on a guy who is coming off a career year at 29 years old. I also think his defense is overrated a bit as he's covered up nicely by Gobert on the inside.


Agreed on the difficulty of landing an RFA, but it doesn't mean we shouldn't try. It's like JaMychal Green with Memphis. If Thibs really likes one of these RFAs, make a strong bid and force Memphis or Utah to match, which potentially pinches their wallet in trying to re-sign another guy or beefing up their roster elsewhere.

Re: Adding a wing

Posted: Thu Jun 01, 2017 10:14 pm
by WildWolf2813
KiwiMatt wrote:
PorkChop wrote:Contending teams pickup small pieces like Rush and Aldrich to fill small minutes from time to time. Those teams are contenders with or without them. The Wolves need to pick up actual difference makers to help get them to the playoffs. A 31 win team bargain shopping for end of the benchers will net them next to nothing in the win column. Step up and make a move that actually improves them in the present and worry about the future later.


The improvement of this team needs to come from the development of KAT, Wiggins and LaVine not depend on the signing of big name a FA. Not yet anyway.

It will need help from free agents in their rotation, because 3 years in, you can question whether Wiggins has actually improved. You have to have reinforcements in case not every player gets better.