sjm34 wrote:khans2k5 wrote:sjm34 wrote:
Who is having those big breakout seasons in Utah or Phoenix? Who are the players there that are going to carry those teams?
I understand the GS, SA, LAC, OKC, Mem, teams being placed well above the teams, but most of these other teams have no more talent than the wolves (right now).
The wolves would be hard pressed to sustain the same amount of injuries to key players again, not to mention not being likely to trade away players at the deadline, and won't be tanking to end the season. 30 wins is what I expect without Ricky this season.
25 wins is unrealistic unless you plan on this team tanking to end the year.
Utah may have the best defensive center in the league. They already have an all-star caliber wing in Heyward and Favors may make the jump to all-star this year as well. Phoenix has 1 all-star in Bledsoe, added Chandler to help with the defense and Knight showed he was a borderline all-star for the Bucks (18/5/4 43/40/88). We have no all-stars. Who's carrying us? Ricky doesn't score enough to carry us. Wiggins and Lavine put up good stats when they were the only options, but we now have a fully healthy squad so they won't get 40 MPG's and a majority of the shots. Their quality young guys are all 3+ years in the league and most of ours are under 2 years.
I like Gobert but he has zero offensive moves other than an alley oop. He is a younger DJ, which doesn't do much for you until you have Chris Paul. Trey Burkes certainly isn't going to make him relevant on that end. Favors is a solid PF, nothing more nothing less. Heyward will likely be passed by Wiggins this season if he hasn't been already.
Not sure when Bledsoe become an allstar. Chandler is way past his prime, and Brandon Knight isn't an upgrade from Ricky. Ricky can carry us because he makes the other guys better around him. Don't really care how many years guys have been in the league, but rather how well they are performing.
The wolves have just as much talent as either of those teams.
Wiggins being better than Hayward already is a laughably homer take. 19/5/4 45/36/81 and a 20+ PER versus 17/5/2 44/31/76 and a 14 PER while Wiggins averaged 2 more MPG's. Bledsoe averaged 17/6/5 as a PG and is a very good defender because he's one of the best athletes in the league. You're also going off of projections and not actual production which goes against your "how well they are performing" line. Why are our guys the only ones allowed to get better in this scenario? Hayward, Favors and Gobert haven't even hit their primes yet. Same goes for Bledsoe and Knight. We have talent, but it is not as close to being consistently productive at a high level as guys like you think. Wiggins showed nothing in the FIBA tournament to make me believe he is going to make a significant leap this year. If everyone is fully healthy they'll both be better than us. Book it.