Re: Vikings at Lions GDT
Posted: Sun Nov 02, 2025 3:17 pm
Terrific third down throw by JJ! Not an easy catch for Nailor, but it worked. Big win for the Vikings, especially with the Packers losing.
Wolves fan commiserate here!
https://forum.midwestvolleyball.com/phpBB3/
https://forum.midwestvolleyball.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?t=32042
Yeah, I think both of our lines looked a lot more like I thought they would at the start of the season. JJ did have more time for sure, but I also thought he did a good job of evading pressure when the pocket broke down...I was surprised to see he was sacked 5 times. The Lions were a beat up team yesterday, but it was still a very good win. And JJ soared in the NFL QB ratings...he's now 40th out of 44 with a rating of 73. He wasn't great yesterday, but he only had one interception and recovered his only fumble. If we stay healthy and our lines continue to play like they did yesterday, a performance like JJ gave us yesterday may be good enough.
I'm not sure where the "underskilled" angle comes from. As I recall, the biggest knock was the lack of sample size because Michigan rarely needed him to throw the ball. Here's Dan Campbell's brief comment:Q-is-here wrote: ↑Mon Nov 03, 2025 9:36 am My Youtube feed is filled with all sorts of JJ McCarthy fawning (haven't watched any of it). One of them has a title of "JJ McCarthy is the comeback player of the year!". Seriously!?
I think we like to romantizize the idea of somewhat underskilled prospects making up for it because they're "winners". It reminds me of all the love Tim Tebow got from a few pundits for a very brief stretch of his NFL career after a couple of dramatic wins. Well, the unskilled part eventually caught up to him.
I'm glad JJ McCarthy helped lead the team to victory, but he has a long ways to go still and it's hard seeing him mature into a deep playoff QB this season.
Meanwhile in Seattle.....
It's just so ridiculous now how week to week a player is trash or a future HOFer (CLickbait). Can we slow the roll a bit? I think JJ played fine overall. His INT was even questionable. Not a great pass, but could easily have been ruled a catch too, then the JJ (drop???) that was overturned also. His arms were under the ball, sure it might have barely touched the ground but I saw nothing at all to overturn it. Just bizarre.Q-is-here wrote: ↑Mon Nov 03, 2025 9:36 am My Youtube feed is filled with all sorts of JJ McCarthy fawning (haven't watched any of it). One of them has a title of "JJ McCarthy is the comeback player of the year!". Seriously!?
I think we like to romantizize the idea of somewhat underskilled prospects making up for it because they're "winners". It reminds me of all the love Tim Tebow got from a few pundits for a very brief stretch of his NFL career after a couple of dramatic wins. Well, the unskilled part eventually caught up to him.
I'm glad JJ McCarthy helped lead the team to victory, but he has a long ways to go still and it's hard seeing him mature into a deep playoff QB this season.
Meanwhile in Seattle.....
I don't trust Sam to revert back to complete trash when the games matter most. He looked completely inept in our last two games. Sure you win 14 games, but then what? Suck ass when you could get the 1 seed and then suck ass in the playoff game? I guess it's a small sample, but then you have to look at his history of sucking ass too and maybe he's very prone to sucking ass?60WinTim wrote: ↑Mon Nov 03, 2025 10:25 amI'm not sure where the "underskilled" angle comes from. As I recall, the biggest knock was the lack of sample size because Michigan rarely needed him to throw the ball. Here's Dan Campbell's brief comment:Q-is-here wrote: ↑Mon Nov 03, 2025 9:36 am My Youtube feed is filled with all sorts of JJ McCarthy fawning (haven't watched any of it). One of them has a title of "JJ McCarthy is the comeback player of the year!". Seriously!?
I think we like to romantizize the idea of somewhat underskilled prospects making up for it because they're "winners". It reminds me of all the love Tim Tebow got from a few pundits for a very brief stretch of his NFL career after a couple of dramatic wins. Well, the unskilled part eventually caught up to him.
I'm glad JJ McCarthy helped lead the team to victory, but he has a long ways to go still and it's hard seeing him mature into a deep playoff QB this season.
Meanwhile in Seattle.....
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/-jGVpQ9jSbM
If Darnold didn't implode in the last two games for the Vikings last year, I imagine there might have been a different conversation at Vikings HQ... But I think if you watch the interviews and how each of those guys carry themselves, JJ radiates leadership much more than Sam.
I guess my point is JJ seems a bit underskilled right now simply based on his QB rating. That doesn't mean he can't get more skilled as time goes on and become a good or even great QB. I honestly don't have an opinion on what his trajectory is, but it feels way premature to declare him the comeback player of the year or the Vikings starting QB for the next 10 years.60WinTim wrote: ↑Mon Nov 03, 2025 10:25 amI'm not sure where the "underskilled" angle comes from. As I recall, the biggest knock was the lack of sample size because Michigan rarely needed him to throw the ball. Here's Dan Campbell's brief comment:Q-is-here wrote: ↑Mon Nov 03, 2025 9:36 am My Youtube feed is filled with all sorts of JJ McCarthy fawning (haven't watched any of it). One of them has a title of "JJ McCarthy is the comeback player of the year!". Seriously!?
I think we like to romantizize the idea of somewhat underskilled prospects making up for it because they're "winners". It reminds me of all the love Tim Tebow got from a few pundits for a very brief stretch of his NFL career after a couple of dramatic wins. Well, the unskilled part eventually caught up to him.
I'm glad JJ McCarthy helped lead the team to victory, but he has a long ways to go still and it's hard seeing him mature into a deep playoff QB this season.
Meanwhile in Seattle.....
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/-jGVpQ9jSbM
If Darnold didn't implode in the last two games for the Vikings last year, I imagine there might have been a different conversation at Vikings HQ... But I think if you watch the interviews and how each of those guys carry themselves, JJ radiates leadership much more than Sam.