Q-was-here wrote:Here's a hypothetical question for everyone:
Putting cap space and salary aside completely and judging only off of age/potential/production, who would you rather have on the Wolves roster for the next 5 years - Wiggins or McDaniels?
You're a bad man, Q. I picture you right now sitting back in your easy chair with a cocktail chuckling as the votes for McDaniels over Wiggins roll in!
All kidding aside, it is a provocative question, because many of us here (me included) are very high on Jaden. But I think we are guilty of homerism in the first degree if we entertain the notion that a promising second year player who hasn't yet earned a starting role on a fringe playoff team will be more valuable over the next five years than an NBA all-star who starts for a team that is the odds on favorite to win the NBA title. I think it would be a tougher call if Wiggins were older, but at 27, he's entering the prime of his career. I love Jaden, but come on guys...you gotta go with a proven NBA starter and former #1 draft pick over a late first rounder who hasn't been able to crack a starting lineup. We all want Jaden to develop as a 3-point shooter and I think he will improve in this area (just as Wig has), but let's not lose sight of the fact that despite getting repeated open corner looks this season, he only made 31.7% of his threes (compared to Wig at 39.3%...also with a lot of open looks with defenses focused on Steph and Klay). The only area I think Jaden will be superior to Wig over the next 5 years is on defense...love his footwork. But his propensity to foul has been an issue going back to college days, and you're not going to help your team much if you can't stay on the court.
Fun question, but I need to take off my Wolves jersey for a moment and give Wiggins his first vote here.