AbeVigodaLive wrote:So does this summarize the Brooklyn thing accurately?
- Durant and Irving show up.
- They demand the Nets sign Deandre Jordan.
- But Kenny Atkinson rightfully realizes that Jarrett Allen is infinitely better.
- So Kenny Atkinson gets fired per Durant... and Allen gets traded. And becomes an All Star. Jordan becomes unplayable.
- Durant wants Nash. Irving says they'll all coach the team.
- Irving can't play because of the vaccination stuff.
- Durant blames the team?
- Durant demands a trade.
- Then demands they fire Nash and/or Marks.
I get that player empowerment is here. I get that draconian owners isn't much/any better. But this is downright silly what's going on in Brooklyn.
I'm already on my way out of college sports with the monetization/bastardization of tradition and faux collegiate atmosphere. Baseball is way too analytics focused. And basketball has its issues if this is the new wave of player empowerment.
Ugh.
You could also do some background on Irving forcing his way out of Cleveland, toying with the Boston fans about staying, poisoning their locker room, and leaving Boston for nothing (which a lot of Boston fans I know were totally cool with). And you could also add a bit about Harden quitting his way out of Houston and Ben Simmons doing the same in Philly leading each of them, consequently, to join the team.
Given the obvious dumpster fire in Brooklyn, I think there's a general consensus in the league that this sort of thing is a problem, which suggests it may happen less in the future. I don't know if it's true that LeBron and AD lobbied for Russ (I'm generally skeptical about a lot of reporting out there about this sort of thing, because it always feels like leaks from one side or another), but it's widely accepted that they did. And the fact that THAT has turned into such a mess is another huge cautionary tale out there. So I suspect we will see a little more daylight between players and front offices in the near future, but we'll see. Remember, this whole thing probably blew up because Sean Marks refused to pay Kyrie long-term after all his BS. So there are limits to what people are willing to put up with. And in retrospect, at least initially, the Nets told Kyrie they wouldn't let him play 50% of the games, which showed that Marks was still in charge--until they reversed that decision . . .
In general, I'm all for player empowerment. Those are the guys we're paying to see, so they should get most of the money and have some real agency in the system. But I agree that when guys are
publicly calling for trades, quitting on their teams to get traded, or just generally acting like Kyrie, that's just not good. I do think it's fine for the players to have
input on personnel decisions, but they shouldn't be able to basically force those decisions like KD and Kyrie were trying to. I think we'll see less and less of the latter in the coming years. As for the publicly demanding trades and quitting on teams? I don't know. That feels a bit more like a genie that's out of the bottle, though they'll obviously address it with the next CBA.