Page 4 of 12
Re: Wolves vs Kings GDT part 2
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:21 pm
by Coolbreeze44
Camden wrote:CoolBreeze44 wrote:Camden wrote:CoolBreeze44 wrote:Trading Beverly would not surprise me greatly. If we don't think we can sign him, might as well recoup something now. I have no idea if his signing is in doubt, but will be interesting to watch.
Trading Patrick Beverley at this point would signify to me that this franchise is still a bunch of losers up top. It's right up there with trading a first-round pick for cash considerations.
Teams in the playoff hunt typically trade for expiring players like Beverley to help them down the stretch -- not sell them off.
Contending teams maybe. We're still building and can't afford to lose assets for nothing. I'm not saying we should trade him, just that it wouldn't surprise me.
Should Minnesota trade Patrick Beverley for a couple of second-round picks or a young player that won't get any minutes for us? Nope. Keep Beverley. Figure out his contract in the off-season.
Maybe he's made it known that he won't sign. Again, not saying they should, just something to watch.
Re: Wolves vs Kings GDT part 2
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:24 pm
by Camden [enjin:6601484]
CoolBreeze44 wrote:Camden wrote:CoolBreeze44 wrote:Camden wrote:CoolBreeze44 wrote:Trading Beverly would not surprise me greatly. If we don't think we can sign him, might as well recoup something now. I have no idea if his signing is in doubt, but will be interesting to watch.
Trading Patrick Beverley at this point would signify to me that this franchise is still a bunch of losers up top. It's right up there with trading a first-round pick for cash considerations.
Teams in the playoff hunt typically trade for expiring players like Beverley to help them down the stretch -- not sell them off.
Contending teams maybe. We're still building and can't afford to lose assets for nothing. I'm not saying we should trade him, just that it wouldn't surprise me.
Should Minnesota trade Patrick Beverley for a couple of second-round picks or a young player that won't get any minutes for us? Nope. Keep Beverley. Figure out his contract in the off-season.
Maybe he's made it known that he won't sign. Again, not saying they should, just something to watch.
That would go against everything that's been reported and everything that Beverley's said. Maybe, but I think you keep him regardless.
Re: Wolves vs Kings GDT part 2
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:27 pm
by Camden [enjin:6601484]
Need to Ant to go through the contact -- not avoid it. Good energy from him tonight, though. Attacking the rim and playing sticky defense.
Re: Wolves vs Kings GDT part 2
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:36 pm
by Camden [enjin:6601484]
Well, Nathan Knight's in the game because Karl-Anthony Towns and Naz Reid have two fouls each.
Re: Wolves vs Kings GDT part 2
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:38 pm
by Camden [enjin:6601484]
Chris Finch gets a tech after complaining about a clear goaltend that went uncalled.
Re: Wolves vs Kings GDT part 2
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:40 pm
by DNatagal
Camden wrote:Well, Nathan Knight's in the game because Karl-Anthony Towns and Naz Reid have two fouls each.
Nope, Naz has zero. He hurt his knee.
Re: Wolves vs Kings GDT part 2
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:41 pm
by Camden [enjin:6601484]
D'Natagal wrote:Camden wrote:Well, Nathan Knight's in the game because Karl-Anthony Towns and Naz Reid have two fouls each.
Nope, Naz has zero. He hurt his knee.
Yep, you're right. Was looking at his points scored. Good catch.
Re: Wolves vs Kings GDT part 2
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:41 pm
by KiwiMatt
Camden wrote:Chris Finch gets a tech after complaining about a clear goaltend that went uncalled.
That was a pretty bad non call. Not to mention the offensive basket interference to end to quarter by Metu as well.
Re: Wolves vs Kings GDT part 2
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:43 pm
by Jester1534
Woofta Prince hit him softer than feather on that foul
Re: Wolves vs Kings GDT part 2
Posted: Wed Feb 09, 2022 9:44 pm
by Camden [enjin:6601484]
jester1534 wrote:Woofta Prince hit him softer than feather on that foul
Was just going to comment on that. I didn't see the foul there.