Camden wrote:Rubio should never shoot a contested jumper.
It was a 2 for 1 so I think it was OK.
I understand the thought process. I think I'd still rather have one good possession that has a decent chance of resulting in points. Rubio making a contested three has such a low probability of ending in points.
Even if it's a 20% shot I like the 2 for 1. The Wolves are not guaranteed at all a good look if they wind the clock down either. So I'd rather take two shots at it.
Camden wrote:Rubio should never shoot a contested jumper.
It was a 2 for 1 so I think it was OK.
I understand the thought process. I think I'd still rather have one good possession that has a decent chance of resulting in points. Rubio making a contested three has such a low probability of ending in points.
Even if it's a 20% shot I like the 2 for 1. The Wolves are not guaranteed at all a good look if they wind the clock down either. So I'd rather take two shots at it.
20-percent might be kind of you. Rubio's shooting 22.2-percent (!) from three on open shots -- meaning the closest defender is within 4-6 feet. That's just not a good shot to me. Oh well.
kekgeek1 wrote:Edwards with the over pts! Easy money
I guess there is literally no one else to take shots when he's out there with Rubio, Vando, and Okogie. KAT has a hard time getting the ball or getting in position, so it leaves Edwards as the only available option.
Please never take a 3 point shot again. We have kidnapper your mother. If you want to see her again never take a 3 again. On second thought she agrees with us so she's cool.
