TheFuture wrote:lipoli390 wrote:LST - Good job painting an optimistic picture of the post-Butler Wolves. Unfortunately, as you already ackowledged, your picture of the Wolves making the playoffs is a work of fantasy. The Wolves won't even satisfy your first criterion because Glen isn't going to fire Thibodeau. This deal was meant to satisfy Thibodeau's win-now mentality. Of course, with Thibodeau as head coach, I don't see this win-now approach resulting in enough wins for a playoff appearance this season. This organization should have focused the Butler deal on 3 years from now, not this season or even next.
How is this a win-now deal compared to keeping butler? Or trading for Richardson and Whiteside/whomever you said you wanted. This move is a great balance of remaining competitive going forward, getting younger, getting surefire NBA players, one of which is locked in to a great deal, while we retain rights on the other.
The three years from now approach was over with the initial Butler trade. Can't go back to that.
Not sure what else you desired/expected..
I wasn't comparing the deal to the alternative of keeping Butler. Obviously, keeping Butler was untenable. Trading Butler for Covington and Saric was a win-now alternative to the untenable alternative win-now strategy of keeping Butler.
Why is the trade primarily a win-now move? For three reasons. First, Covington is Butler's age with no further upside. Second, we get no draft picks or young prospects other than Saric. Third, the upside value of Saric is significantly limited in my view inasmuch as (1) he's a good, not great player, (2) given his level of athleticism, skill set and performance to date, he doesn't appear to have all-star level potential, and (3) even if he has high upside, the fact that he has only one year left on his contract after this season creates a significant risk that he won't stay long enough for the Wolves to benefit from that upside. So the upside part of this deal is limited entirely to one asset, Saric, and that asset has limited upside for the reasons I enumerated above. Even if you don't think this was primarily a win-now deal, I question the fit of these two players with our young cornerstones.
I hope I'm wrong, but I think this was a bad deal for the Wolves. Sadly I have the same feeling about this deal that I had about other decisions by this organization when they were made, including signing Darko, drafting Flynn instead of Curry or DeRozan, passing on McCollum, drafting Bazz instead of Giannis, hiring Thibodeau, drafting Dunn instead of Hield or Murray, drafting Patton instead of Collins or Anunoby, signing Teague instead of Darren Collison, etc. This has the same feel to it, although not quite as bad as how I felt about most of those past decisions I've listed without the benefit of hindsight. I understand there are those who disagree with me. That's fine. I sure hope they're right and I'm wrong.
But as Woj reported in the article I just posted, Thibodeau screwed this up and Glen Taylor allowed him to screw it up. It's the same old story for this franchise.