Re: Young and Cheap
Posted: Sat Aug 10, 2019 11:05 pm
I agree with Q and I have a much harsher outlook on this.
The pro is that he's doing kinda what I wanted him to do, at least with the rookies. He has 3 rookies and 2 two-way guys. That to me, are the "bites at the apple." Bringing in these other castaways and retreads only has one positive outcome, and that's if we can rehabilitate their value. I've always maintained that this organization doesn't value player development and that we should be the Oakland A's of hoops, where player development is above everything else, even if these players we develop leave and shine elsewhere. We have to give fringe players a reason to be here, and if the possibility of saving their careers is a reason, so be it.
The downside is that outside of Layman (and that's because he's here for 3 years), I'm not too invested in how Vonleh does, or Napier or Graham or Bell. Why? The odds of any of them returning regardless of their performance is slim to none. Rosas can't preach flexibility and then give these guys new deals if they play even markedly better. None of these guys overnight will become huge stars. They may have had the potential to do so, but smarter franchises than ours couldn't get it out of them. Vonleh's not gonna go from 8 and 8 to 18 and 10, and even if he did, would that be enough for Rosas to think he's found his 2nd star? No. He's gonna let some other team overpay for him and we're left trying to do this again with someone else until a 2nd star emerges, and the way I see it, it's gonna have to come from Culver, Reid, Nowell, next year's 1st and 2nd and nowhere else. It might be different if these guys were on the contract Layman was on, but right now, the hope is we're good enough to get away with starting Layman the way Portland did, but we're a ways away from the roster Portland has.
I admire the strategy, but let's be blatantly honest with ourselves, what is Rosas doing that David Kahn didn't do, especially early on? What's the difference between praying we get something out of Vonleh vs. praying we get something out of Anthony Randolph? What's the difference between churning through failed players elsewhere with Kahn vs. the strategy of churning through failed players with Rosas? All we can hope for is that Rosas has a much better eye for talent, but hey, I didn't see many people complaining about even Flynn early on. I've seen this movie before. I just don't know if this has a different ending.
The pro is that he's doing kinda what I wanted him to do, at least with the rookies. He has 3 rookies and 2 two-way guys. That to me, are the "bites at the apple." Bringing in these other castaways and retreads only has one positive outcome, and that's if we can rehabilitate their value. I've always maintained that this organization doesn't value player development and that we should be the Oakland A's of hoops, where player development is above everything else, even if these players we develop leave and shine elsewhere. We have to give fringe players a reason to be here, and if the possibility of saving their careers is a reason, so be it.
The downside is that outside of Layman (and that's because he's here for 3 years), I'm not too invested in how Vonleh does, or Napier or Graham or Bell. Why? The odds of any of them returning regardless of their performance is slim to none. Rosas can't preach flexibility and then give these guys new deals if they play even markedly better. None of these guys overnight will become huge stars. They may have had the potential to do so, but smarter franchises than ours couldn't get it out of them. Vonleh's not gonna go from 8 and 8 to 18 and 10, and even if he did, would that be enough for Rosas to think he's found his 2nd star? No. He's gonna let some other team overpay for him and we're left trying to do this again with someone else until a 2nd star emerges, and the way I see it, it's gonna have to come from Culver, Reid, Nowell, next year's 1st and 2nd and nowhere else. It might be different if these guys were on the contract Layman was on, but right now, the hope is we're good enough to get away with starting Layman the way Portland did, but we're a ways away from the roster Portland has.
I admire the strategy, but let's be blatantly honest with ourselves, what is Rosas doing that David Kahn didn't do, especially early on? What's the difference between praying we get something out of Vonleh vs. praying we get something out of Anthony Randolph? What's the difference between churning through failed players elsewhere with Kahn vs. the strategy of churning through failed players with Rosas? All we can hope for is that Rosas has a much better eye for talent, but hey, I didn't see many people complaining about even Flynn early on. I've seen this movie before. I just don't know if this has a different ending.