Page 4 of 5

Re: Which Two?

Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2016 2:20 pm
by Monster
bleedspeed177 wrote:
monsterpile wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:
bleedspeed177 wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:
bleedspeed177 wrote:I said :"Wiggins/LaVine" because someone had to do it.

You and Jason are using the same mood enhancer.


I wanted to pick Payne and Tyus.

I would have backed you 100% :-P


Hummel and Lorenzo Brown were my 3rd choice...


Well if we are going guys not on the roster I have to go with McCants and Beasley. Both are proven scorers and just crazy enough to be dangerous.


Beas, McCants and Ricky Davis are a package deal. If you bring 1 of them you gotta bring all three.

Re: Which Two?

Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2016 3:55 pm
by bleedspeed
Well this is pick two. Not pick your trio to form a dynasty. Ricky Davis would be a good player for this team. Look how he mentored a young LeBron James.

Re: Which Two?

Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2016 4:00 pm
by Monster
bleedspeed177 wrote:Well this is pick two. Not pick your trio to form a dynasty. Ricky Davis would be a good player for this team. Look how he mentored a young LeBron James.


Is this thread sponsored by McDonalds McPick2? If not what a wasted opportunity.

Re: Which Two?

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 8:39 pm
by TAFKASP
Can I change my vote? Zach is such a phenomenal shooter, I'm not sure the kid even has a ceiling at this point! He has to have ice water running through his veins, a new Cardiac Kid!

Re: Which Two?

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 10:43 pm
by Camden [enjin:6601484]
Wiggins is ultra-talented. He has ALL the tools. He's produced as well as you can ask him to. If I had to (I don't), I'd take Towns/LaVine over him.

That's not even meant as a jab towards Wiggins either. I just feel THAT great about Towns and LaVine. Always thought that was a possibility.

We're spoiled as Wolves fans. That hasn't been the case for a long, long time.

Re: Which Two?

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 10:55 pm
by TAFKASP
Camden wrote:Wiggins is ultra-talented. He has ALL the tools. He's produced as well as you can ask him to. If I had to (I don't), I'd take Towns/LaVine over him.

That's not even meant as a jab towards Wiggins either. I just feel THAT great about Towns and LaVine. Always thought that was a possibility.

We're spoiled as Wolves fans. That hasn't been the case for a long, long time.


KG/Cassell/Spree was not just the last time Wolves fans were spoiled, it was the only time prior to today!

Re: Which Two?

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 11:01 pm
by Camden [enjin:6601484]
12 times a team passed on LaVine in the 2014 NBA Draft... Every single one of them will regret that. Potentially the best player in the class. That's insane to think about.

Re: Which Two?

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 11:16 pm
by Mstermisty [enjin:6864008]
Thankfully we have all of them.

Re: Which Two?

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 11:48 pm
by KiwiMatt
Bloody hard question to answer. I went KAT and LaVine. But I'd be happy with any combination and can't see any reason why we can't keep all three long term.

Re: Which Two?

Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2016 12:11 am
by Lipoli390
I also went with KAT and LaVine. And that was before tonight's game against the Wizards where Zach confirmed my view in a big way.

I'm still a big Wiggins fan. I'm also really high on Gorgui and have been for a long time. Then there's Ricky - the straw that stirs the drink. In other words, I see 5 key players going forward and the challenge for this organization will be keeping them all.

As for Zach over Wiggins, it wasn't a tough choice for me. Zach has a decided edge over Wiggins in two key areas: perimeter shooting and ball handling. You can't be a great wing player without excelling in both area. Zach has also shown more marked improvement so his trajectory is better.

I agree that Andrew is a better on-ball defender, but as pointed out, that's only when he's dialed in and he seems to lose focus or intensity too often. Andrew also has a significant length advantage and is much better at drawing contact and getting to the line.

But in the end, Zach's superior ball-handling and shooting win the day, especially when coupled with Zach's upward trajectory and obvious moxie. The ball-handling disparity is particularly significant to me because Wiggins is so bad in that area for a wing player and it's the sort of basic motor skill the usually doesn't develop much more when you're in your 20s.

Finally, down by 2 or 3 with seconds left in th game, who in whose hands would you rather have the ball? I'd say Zach. I wouldn't have said that 2 months ago, but that's how much Zach has improved. And it's what I mean by Zach's moxie - something most if not all great players have. Zach's defense has also improved and I recall Flip telling me he drafted Zach in large part because of his defensive potential.

So I keep Zach over Wiggins if I have to make that choice. But I'd fight like hell to keep both!!!! Along with Gorgui, Ricky and of course - Towns!