longstrangetrip wrote:AbeVigodaLive wrote:BizarroJerry wrote:The point I wanted to make with Parker was that he realized (and the coaches) he wasn't going to be a deep outside threat and his game changed to be more of a rim attacker. I think Rubio can make those same adjustments.
Tony Parker is a HOF player. I love how Rubio fans always find those rare finds like Kidd or Parker to try to show that there's hope for Rubio too.
What about the dozens or so other comparables like Brevin Knight who didn't pan out?
Maybe it's not appropriate to compare Ricky to Parker yet, but I think it's less appropriate to compare him to Knight. Knight never captured the attention of NBA fans and experts like Ricky does, and while there are many who see Ricky as having the potential for greatness, I don't recall "Knight" and "greatness" ever being used in the same sentence. I don't know that Ricky is ever going to fix his mid-range jumper, but I will be surprised if he doesn't greatly improve his ability to finish. Ricky is a magician with the basketball, and is fully capable of making the small adjustments needed to turn those layups into buckets and even "and ones". Combine that with playing for a coach who is more likely to let him play the way he wants to, rather than running the offense through a big man at the free throw line, and I'm convinced we will see a huge improvement in Ricky.
He's only 23 and may end up being as good as Tony Parker, but I think there is no chance he will ever be Brevin Knight.
1st 3 years in the league:
Knight:
- 9.0 ppg / 8.2 ast / 2.5 stl / 44.1% fg
- 9.6 ppg / 7.7 ast / 1.8 stl / 42.5% fg
- 9.3 ppg / 7.0 ast / 1.6 stl / 41.2% fg
Rubio:
- 10.6 ppg / 8.2 ast / 2.2 stl / 35.7% fg
- 10.7 ppg / 7.3 ast / 2.4 stl / 36.0% fg
- 9.5 ppg / 8.6 ast / 2.3 stl / 38.1% fg
Now, granted... Knight actually seemed to regress. And, Rubio has largely plateaued. But to compare stats from each guy's first three seasons and not acknowledge any similarities?
I don't care how popular Rubio is. Or how "dynamic" he is with fancy passes. If it doesn't translate to stats and wins, he's not a franchise saving player. He MIGHT be. But there is little evidence thus far that indicates he's going to make a huge leap to that level based on his fairly even first three years in the league.
[Note: Parker was shooting 55% fg and scoring 19 ppg with 2 titles by the time he was 23.]