WOJ Live: Free Agency Show

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
TheFuture
Posts: 3000
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2014 12:00 am

Re: WOJ Live: Free Agency Show

Post by TheFuture »

monsterpile wrote:Anyone else surprised Ezeli hasn't gotten paid yet? I mean Mozgov got plenty of money. There are still some teams out there that could spend a decent chunk on him.


I hope Dallas signs him to a big offer sheet too
User avatar
longstrangetrip [enjin:6600564]
Posts: 9432
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: WOJ Live: Free Agency Show

Post by longstrangetrip [enjin:6600564] »

I've seen Jamal Crawford mentioned a couple times here, and I don't understand the attraction. I've always thought of Crawford as a poor man's Kevin Martin...they both struggle mightily on defense, they both are among the best in the business in creating their own shots, and they both developed reputations as 3-point shooters. But Martin is 2years younger, and has been consistently the better 3-point shooter. Martin is a 38.5% career 3-point shooter, while Crawford is at about the league average at 35%. The last two years Crawford hit only 33% and 34% of his threes...in contrast, Martin never shot below 37% on threes in his three years here.

I think Martin is a free agent. If we truly need shooting (and based on our 3rd in the league 3-point ranking the last half of last year, I'm not completely convinced we do), why isn't Kevin Martin a better option than Jamal Crawford? Please provide statistical support for your argument and show your work.
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 24088
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: WOJ Live: Free Agency Show

Post by Monster »

longstrangetrip wrote:I've seen Jamal Crawford mentioned a couple times here, and I don't understand the attraction. I've always thought of Crawford as a poor man's Kevin Martin...they both struggle mightily on defense, they both are among the best in the business in creating their own shots, and they both developed reputations as 3-point shooters. But Martin is 2years younger, and has been consistently the better 3-point shooter. Martin is a 38.5% career 3-point shooter, while Crawford is at about the league average at 35%. The last two years Crawford hit only 33% and 34% of his threes...in contrast, Martin never shot below 37% on threes in his three years here.

I think Martin is a free agent. If we truly need shooting (and based on our 3rd in the league 3-point ranking the last half of last year, I'm not completely convinced we do), why isn't Kevin Martin a better option than Jamal Crawford? Please provide statistical support for your argument and show your work.


Crawford is a much more creative player with the ball. More of a combo guard that Martin. I'm not sure if people would be talking about him so much of Wolfson wasn't such a Crawford homer. Lol

Edit: I'd be ok with Crawford I'm not making a significant argument for him.
User avatar
Porckchop
Posts: 2513
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 12:00 am

Re: WOJ Live: Free Agency Show

Post by Porckchop »

Please provide statistical support for your argument and show your work.
]

Mrs. Van Buckle is that you?