Camden wrote:Rudy Gobert also needed to defend Nikola Jokic. I understand the idea of having him check Aaron Gordon and trying to roam the middle at times, but Naz Reid clearly couldn't handle that matchup and got abused repeatedly. Gobert's a three-time Defensive Player of the Year who has often made things difficult for opposing offensive bigs. He needed to man up on Jokic. Have to blame him and Chris Finch for not recognizing it early enough and changing the game plan.
That's not to say that it would have made a difference on the outcome, or that Gobert would have shut down an all-time great producer like Jokic, but why did we trade him for if not matchups like this one? I remember Gobert defended Joel Embiid earlier in the season. I remember Gobert defended Jonas Valenciunias. I've seen him defend Karl-Anthony Towns in past seasons. What's the difference here? Have to take those big boy matchups if you're Gobert. In part, that's what he was brought in to do. You can't assign the elite matchup down low to guys like Naz Reid and Kyle Anderson. Get in there and battle.
I agree with you on the matchup strategy, Cam. However, I'll also note that the offensive and rebounding stats of KAT and Jokic against Gobert are essentially the same as their career averages. Valanciunas actually has better scoring and rebounding averages against Gobert compared to his career averages. Embiid has scored 2.5 points less against Gobert than his career average (24.3 v. 26.8), but has averaged slightly more rebounds against Gobert compared to his career average. In other words, Gobert's defensive effectiveness against these top offensive centers hasn't been stellar. Having said that, he's still a much better defensive matchup than Naz Reid or Kyle Anderson against top centers. Of course, it's a problem when the opposing center scores 20 and your starting center scores 0, but that's entirely different issue than the one you identified.