Page 5 of 5
Re: Wolves sign Jordan Bell
Posted: Tue Jul 02, 2019 4:38 pm
by Lipoli390
monsterpile wrote:lipoli390 wrote:WildWolf2813 wrote:team needs the bodies.
for vet minimum, why not?
I would have preferred C. Diallo as a young big with upside.
I liked him also. I'm just happy we got either one of those guys especially one for the min.
Wolfson reported that Tolliver checked back with the Wolves before signing with the Blazers. Assuming Tolliver would have been willing to sign for the min I'm guessing this team is going in on development because Tolliver for the min is a freaking bargain.
Interesting news on Tolliver. I would have liked to bring back Tolliver. But I'm the last one to argue against going all in on development with younger players. :)
I'm with you on being happy we ended up with one of the two - Diallo or Bell. But I suspect we're going to regret ending up with Bell rather than Diallo. Diallo strikes me as having HUGE upside given how little he's played, even in his one year of college. Yet, his rebounding numbers last year were elite on a per minute basis. But yeah, I'm not upset we ended up with Bell on a minimum deal.
Re: Wolves sign Jordan Bell
Posted: Tue Jul 02, 2019 4:52 pm
by BizarroJerry [enjin:6592520]
Anyone interested in Danny Green? I think he's one of the few big names left.
Re: Wolves sign Jordan Bell
Posted: Tue Jul 02, 2019 4:55 pm
by kekgeek
BizarroJerry wrote:Anyone interested in Danny Green? I think he's one of the few big names left.
We don't have the money
Re: Wolves sign Jordan Bell
Posted: Tue Jul 02, 2019 5:28 pm
by Monster
lipoli390 wrote:monsterpile wrote:lipoli390 wrote:WildWolf2813 wrote:team needs the bodies.
for vet minimum, why not?
I would have preferred C. Diallo as a young big with upside.
I liked him also. I'm just happy we got either one of those guys especially one for the min.
Wolfson reported that Tolliver checked back with the Wolves before signing with the Blazers. Assuming Tolliver would have been willing to sign for the min I'm guessing this team is going in on development because Tolliver for the min is a freaking bargain.
Interesting news on Tolliver. I would have liked to bring back Tolliver. But I'm the last one to argue against going all in on development with younger players. :)
I'm with you on being happy we ended up with one of the two - Diallo or Bell. But I suspect we're going to regret ending up with Bell rather than Diallo. Diallo strikes me as having HUGE upside given how little he's played, even in his one year of college. Yet, his rebounding numbers last year were elite on a per minute basis. But yeah, I'm not upset we ended up with Bell on a minimum deal.
I'd take Vonleh over both guys and we got him.
Re: Wolves sign Jordan Bell
Posted: Tue Jul 02, 2019 5:37 pm
by Lipoli390
monsterpile wrote:lipoli390 wrote:monsterpile wrote:lipoli390 wrote:WildWolf2813 wrote:team needs the bodies.
for vet minimum, why not?
I would have preferred C. Diallo as a young big with upside.
I liked him also. I'm just happy we got either one of those guys especially one for the min.
Wolfson reported that Tolliver checked back with the Wolves before signing with the Blazers. Assuming Tolliver would have been willing to sign for the min I'm guessing this team is going in on development because Tolliver for the min is a freaking bargain.
Interesting news on Tolliver. I would have liked to bring back Tolliver. But I'm the last one to argue against going all in on development with younger players. :)
I'm with you on being happy we ended up with one of the two - Diallo or Bell. But I suspect we're going to regret ending up with Bell rather than Diallo. Diallo strikes me as having HUGE upside given how little he's played, even in his one year of college. Yet, his rebounding numbers last year were elite on a per minute basis. But yeah, I'm not upset we ended up with Bell on a minimum deal.
I'd take Vonleh over both guys and we got him.
Ditto!