Q12543 wrote:CoolBreeze44 wrote:If Sam was serious about starting Zach at the 2, I sure as hell hope he was going to give it a longer trial than just 3 preseason games played without our starting point guard. I'm starting to think he has already moved away from that idea. Otherwise he should be playing a ton at that position right now, not coming off the bench to play point. But then again this is Sam Mitchell we are talking about. I don't expect many of his moves to make a whole lot of sense.
Sam should have never made that declaration so damn early. I get that he was heavily leaning that way, but he should have let things play out longer to validate his inclination before going public with it and committing. LaVine is going to get plenty of playing time either way, especially with Martin's unreliable health.
The other thing I'm scratching my head about is starting Prince at the 3. I'm not sure what the benefit of that is other than it moves Wiggins to the 2. But then why not start 'Bazz at the 3 if you want to experiment with a bigger lineup? KG,Towns, Prince, Rubio, and Wiggins might be OK defensively, but now there is a total imbalance on offense, with Wiggins being the only real scorer in this group, and as we've seen, he's struggled this pre-season.
I think Sam wanted to go all in on Zach and now he seems a bit worried about getting him going. As long and Sam doesn't stay stubborn with a lineup I am fine with him trying a few things.
IF Prince starts with Wiggins at SG I could see that making some sense as you would start solid with defense and guys that know whattheybare doing right off the bat. Prince and KG would likely sub out quickly and bring in Bjelica and another wing player. Its possible that Sam sees some matchups against some teams that altering the starting lineup my benefit everyone.
I don't care who is coaching this team it's would be tough with the vets and young talent mixed together. I am not suggesting Sam will make all the right moves I am just saying it's gonna be tricky.