Minnesota Sports Forum

Camden wrote:
- Getting rid of Young doesn't give us cap space. Rubio's extension kicks in next year.

- West isn't signing here. Aging vet who wants some jewelry, and he won't get it here.

- How about seeing Young play with other starters before writing him off? My goodness.

- Wolves won't sign a free agent next summer that's better than Young. Think we need to realize this.

Fair enough. I wonder if the Bucks with be interested in Young for Henson and parts. Would you do that trade?

bleedspeed177 wrote:

Camden wrote:
- Getting rid of Young doesn't give us cap space. Rubio's extension kicks in next year.

- West isn't signing here. Aging vet who wants some jewelry, and he won't get it here.

- How about seeing Young play with other starters before writing him off? My goodness.

- Wolves won't sign a free agent next summer that's better than Young. Think we need to realize this.

Fair enough. I wonder if the Bucks with be interested in Young for Henson and parts. Would you do that trade?

Yes, but the Bucks are probably smart enough to not do it.

Thad young has become the derrick williams of the past few years in this forum. Where a mere mention of him in any topic will lead to a long discussion regarding his play/position/fit/value/usefull/uselessness.

worldK wrote:Thad young has become the derrick williams of the past few years in this forum. Where a mere mention of him in any topic will lead to a long discussion regarding his play/position/fit/value/usefull/uselessness.

World, I'd take Derrick any day over Young.

worldK wrote:Thad young has become the derrick williams of the past few years in this forum. Where a mere mention of him in any topic will lead to a long discussion regarding his play/position/fit/value/usefull/uselessness.

Or lack thereof for any/all of the above.

CoolBreeze44 wrote:

worldK wrote:Thad young has become the derrick williams of the past few years in this forum. Where a mere mention of him in any topic will lead to a long discussion regarding his play/position/fit/value/usefull/uselessness.

World, I'd take Derrick any day over Young.

Thad Young is twice the player Derrick Williams is.

KiwiMatt wrote:

CoolBreeze44 wrote:
World, I'd take Derrick any day over Young.

Thad Young is twice the player Derrick Williams is.

That's not saying much :/

CoolBreeze44 wrote:

worldK wrote:Thad young has become the derrick williams of the past few years in this forum. Where a mere mention of him in any topic will lead to a long discussion regarding his play/position/fit/value/usefull/uselessness.

World, I'd take Derrick any day over Young.

I seriously can't take your posts about Thad seriously. I don't know which ones are jokes (hopefully this one) and which one is just you being wrong about basketball.

Camden wrote:

CoolBreeze44 wrote:

worldK wrote:Thad young has become the derrick williams of the past few years in this forum. Where a mere mention of him in any topic will lead to a long discussion regarding his play/position/fit/value/usefull/uselessness.

World, I'd take Derrick any day over Young.

I seriously can't take your posts about Thad seriously. I don't know which ones are jokes (hopefully this one) and which one is just you being wrong about basketball.

Cam, It doesn't look that wrong...

http://www.basketball-reference.com/play-index/pcm_finder.cgi?request=1&sum=0&y1=2015&p1=willide02&y2=2015&p2=youngth01&p3=&p4=&p5=&p6=

What does it say about Young that Williams is outplaying him?

TheGrey08 wrote:

KiwiMatt wrote:

CoolBreeze44 wrote:
World, I'd take Derrick any day over Young.

Thad Young is twice the player Derrick Williams is.

That's not saying much :/

Lol I know, I'm far from on the Thad bandwagon.