Sammitch on Chad Hartman's show today

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
TAFKASP
Posts: 5356
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Sammitch on Chad Hartman's show today

Post by TAFKASP »

AbeVigodaLive wrote:I've been thinking about this very important issue for awhile now. And I have come up with a solution.

Brooklyn_Wolves guy has to die. There's no other way.


How 'bout we reduce his sentence to a very serious illness, one he will overcome eventually but only after great suffering? It'll be an experience that gives him a greater respect for his fellow Wolves fan!

Edit: On second thought, we could just make him be seen in public on a date with Momma!
User avatar
AbeVigodaLive
Posts: 10272
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Sammitch on Chad Hartman's show today

Post by AbeVigodaLive »

TheSP wrote:
AbeVigodaLive wrote:I've been thinking about this very important issue for awhile now. And I have come up with a solution.

Brooklyn_Wolves guy has to die. There's no other way.


How 'bout we reduce his sentence to a very serious illness, one he will overcome eventually but only after great suffering? It'll be an experience that gives him a greater respect for his fellow Wolves fan!

Edit: On second thought, we could just make him be seen in public on a date with Momma!



As long as there is great suffering, I'm cool with it.
User avatar
TAFKASP
Posts: 5356
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Sammitch on Chad Hartman's show today

Post by TAFKASP »

AbeVigodaLive wrote:
TheSP wrote:
AbeVigodaLive wrote:I've been thinking about this very important issue for awhile now. And I have come up with a solution.

Brooklyn_Wolves guy has to die. There's no other way.


How 'bout we reduce his sentence to a very serious illness, one he will overcome eventually but only after great suffering? It'll be an experience that gives him a greater respect for his fellow Wolves fan!

Edit: On second thought, we could just make him be seen in public on a date with Momma!



As long as there is great suffering, I'm cool with it.


So then a public date with Momma it is!
User avatar
Monster
Posts: 24067
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Sammitch on Chad Hartman's show today

Post by Monster »

TheRealSP wrote:
monsterpile wrote:My bad this is a place that should be safe to vent.


Are you a college student?

Image


That sign... Lol

To answer your question with maybe a longer answer than you were wanting...No I am not a college student but I spend time around them a decent amount because a lot of my friends work at a small college that I graduated from and was employed at for a few years. Because of this I tend to be involved in a lot of talk about finding ways for conversations to happen on campus and in other spheres as well. One of my friends is a popular culture scholar and a social justice type so she is intensely interested in creating and participating opportunities to have conversations about a variety of topics in all kinds of ways. For me this forum and the old ESPN board has been largely a great place for conversations back and forth about the Wolves and at times other topics I would like to keep it that way. I can always do better at communicating and keeping this a great place to have conversations and share.
User avatar
khans2k5 [enjin:6608728]
Posts: 6414
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Sammitch on Chad Hartman's show today

Post by khans2k5 [enjin:6608728] »

So out of our top 10 +/- lineups, Wiggins is a SG in the bottom 3 and a SF in 3 lineups that are better in the top 10. Can someone explain to me why a guy who is just as effective at the 3 as the 2 is blocking a guy from playing the 2? Seriously. Ricky is blocking Zach at the 1. Wiggins is blocking Zach at the 2 and nobody is blocked at the 3, but theoretically Andrew can move to the 3 just as effectively and open that spot at the two for Zach. Can someone explain why it makes sense to block Zach when you don't have to? Why can't Zach play next to Ricky and Wiggins and then when Ricky goes down move him over to the PG spot? Is that illegal? A combo guard is a guy who can play both spots depending on who is on the court with him. Zach isn't a combo guard nor is he being developed as one if he doesn't play both spots. We're literally pigeon holeing Zach as a backup player this early in his career when we don't have to. How is that not stupid?

He's being blocked by someone who can play another position and the team loses nothing. What's the point of having a guy like Wiggins if he's already being pigeon holed as the starting SG moving forward? The whole point of getting him is he is a constant at either position so you can do whatever you want around him and he'll fit in. You can play Zach at the two next to him and he's fine. You can play Bazz next to him at the 3 and he's fine. Why shouldn't we try Zach at the 2 next to him now to see if that will work moving forward or if we'd be better off keeping Zach as a combo guard off the bench and bringing in a more versatile 3 who can start next to Wiggins? Why make Zach the bench guy/spot starter for life now and go the find the SF route when we don't even know what Zach can do as a 2 and Wiggins being interchangeable allows you to experiment and make the right choice long-term? Wiggins gives us options and we aren't even trying different possibilities. That's just such a waste.
User avatar
GymRat [enjin:6592663]
Posts: 417
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Sammitch on Chad Hartman's show today

Post by GymRat [enjin:6592663] »

Khans you're in danger of making too much sense. Be careful. The walls have eyes and ears.
User avatar
JasonIsDaMan [enjin:7981157]
Posts: 1270
Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Sammitch on Chad Hartman's show today

Post by JasonIsDaMan [enjin:7981157] »

Two questions
1. Isn't Brooklyn Wolves Guy "WildWolf" from the BSPN boards?
2. Strange: Did you have to reimburse Pat Miles for the slap? And if yes, does Belinda Jensen offer spankings?
User avatar
longstrangetrip [enjin:6600564]
Posts: 9432
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Sammitch on Chad Hartman's show today

Post by longstrangetrip [enjin:6600564] »

Q12543 wrote:
Brooklyn_Wolves wrote:
longstrangetrip wrote:Yeah, I get frustrated watching Zach often too, q. But I try to remind myself that he's only a 20-year-old kid without even much college experience who was force fed into the NBA last season. It was logical that Zach was going to struggle more than most young NBA players, especially in light of his lack of experience with his new position. PG is much more difficult to play than SG.

But I also acknowledge a lot of improvement in Zach this year. We all know he ranked at the bottom of most statistical categories last year, even though he was playing a lot of his minutes at SG. Playing almost exclusively PG this year, his numbers are improved over last year...and dramatically in some instances. I think his numbers compare favorably to many other backup PGs.

The default position on this board is that Zach has a low basketball IQ. He certainly plays that way at times, but so do most rookies (watch budding superstar Mudiay, for instance, who is struggling more than Zach) and 2nd year players, and his improvement this year leads me to the conclusion that Zach's ineffectiveness is due more to inexperience than low basketball IQ.

I can't argue that Mitchell's declaring Zach the starting SG after 2 practices and then reversing course within a week was head-scratching...clearly a blunder. But he now seems to have a consistent vision for what he wants Zach to be and thinks Zach can be, and I think Zach has responded well...at least when he has been allowed to play the backup role rather than having to line up against the other team's starting PG.

I recognize that I'm practically a lone voice about this topic, here and on other boards too, but I hope Sam stays the course with Zach. I agree with Sam that with Ricky's injury history which is frustratingly recurring again this year, PG is Zach's best chance of becoming a starter and perhaps even a star in the NBA. I'm going to be patient, look for continuing improvement, and hope for a Chauncey Billups career trajectory for Zach.



F*ck no! I hope Wiggy and KAT don't have to put up with Zach as their PG for the duration of their careers here. That would be unfair to these young studs. And you are lying about Zach playing a lot of SG last year. He only played a little at the end of the season and performed better at that position than at PG.


Mmmm, not sure I've ever heard anyone accuse LST of being a liar. That's a little harsh.

My guess is that LST meant to say that Zach played most of his minutes as a PG last year, thus his improvement this year is encouraging (from his perspective) since it's mostly an apples-to-apples comparison and the trend is headed in the right direction.


Umm...in the interest of full disclosure, an ex-wife or 2 may have accused me of being a liar once or twice :oops:

Actually, I did mean to say Zach played more minutes at SG than PG last year because that was my perception based on all the minutes he played there late in the year. But basketball-reference says he has played 94% of his minutes at PG both seasons. I don't know if that makes me mendacious, but if basketball-reference is correct, it makes that part of my statement incorrect.

I don't think that takes anything away from my main point though...that Zach has shown significant improvement over last year, and that we need to give this kid time to grow into his role. Here are his comparative stats from basketball-reference.com:

http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/l/lavinza01.html

Zach's current year stats are much improved over last year...17.9 points and 6.9 assists per 36 compared to 14.7 and 5.2 last year. Who knows if he can keep it up, but if he makes the same kind of improvement the next two years, we will have a 22-year-old PG with nice stats. PER has increased from a rookie 11.3 to a respectable 14.1 (I would guess that is close to the league average for backup PG's), and almost all other advanced stats show improvement. His TO percentage is up slightly, but one 8 TO game will do that to a guy 8 games into a season. But his defensive rating has improved 10 points, despite spending a lot of his time on the court with Martin, Bazz and Gorgui.

Maybe it's just me, but I'm happy with a raw 20-year-old kid putting up 17.9 and 6.9 per 36 with a defensive rating of 104. I'm looking forward to see those numbers continue to improve as Zach gets more and more comfortable with a position he is still learning. That's why I hope Sam stays the course.
User avatar
longstrangetrip [enjin:6600564]
Posts: 9432
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Sammitch on Chad Hartman's show today

Post by longstrangetrip [enjin:6600564] »

JasonIsDaMan wrote:Two questions
1. Isn't Brooklyn Wolves Guy "WildWolf" from the BSPN boards?
2. Strange: Did you have to reimburse Pat Miles for the slap? And if yes, does Belinda Jensen offer spankings?


Ha, I thought about suing WCCO, but Pat weighs about 95 pounds soaking wet so she doesn't pack much of a punch! I gotta admit I would have preferred the spanking from Bel though!
User avatar
AbeVigodaLive
Posts: 10272
Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Sammitch on Chad Hartman's show today

Post by AbeVigodaLive »

longstrangetrip wrote:
Q12543 wrote:
Brooklyn_Wolves wrote:
longstrangetrip wrote:Yeah, I get frustrated watching Zach often too, q. But I try to remind myself that he's only a 20-year-old kid without even much college experience who was force fed into the NBA last season. It was logical that Zach was going to struggle more than most young NBA players, especially in light of his lack of experience with his new position. PG is much more difficult to play than SG.

But I also acknowledge a lot of improvement in Zach this year. We all know he ranked at the bottom of most statistical categories last year, even though he was playing a lot of his minutes at SG. Playing almost exclusively PG this year, his numbers are improved over last year...and dramatically in some instances. I think his numbers compare favorably to many other backup PGs.

The default position on this board is that Zach has a low basketball IQ. He certainly plays that way at times, but so do most rookies (watch budding superstar Mudiay, for instance, who is struggling more than Zach) and 2nd year players, and his improvement this year leads me to the conclusion that Zach's ineffectiveness is due more to inexperience than low basketball IQ.

I can't argue that Mitchell's declaring Zach the starting SG after 2 practices and then reversing course within a week was head-scratching...clearly a blunder. But he now seems to have a consistent vision for what he wants Zach to be and thinks Zach can be, and I think Zach has responded well...at least when he has been allowed to play the backup role rather than having to line up against the other team's starting PG.

I recognize that I'm practically a lone voice about this topic, here and on other boards too, but I hope Sam stays the course with Zach. I agree with Sam that with Ricky's injury history which is frustratingly recurring again this year, PG is Zach's best chance of becoming a starter and perhaps even a star in the NBA. I'm going to be patient, look for continuing improvement, and hope for a Chauncey Billups career trajectory for Zach.



F*ck no! I hope Wiggy and KAT don't have to put up with Zach as their PG for the duration of their careers here. That would be unfair to these young studs. And you are lying about Zach playing a lot of SG last year. He only played a little at the end of the season and performed better at that position than at PG.


Mmmm, not sure I've ever heard anyone accuse LST of being a liar. That's a little harsh.

My guess is that LST meant to say that Zach played most of his minutes as a PG last year, thus his improvement this year is encouraging (from his perspective) since it's mostly an apples-to-apples comparison and the trend is headed in the right direction.


Umm...in the interest of full disclosure, an ex-wife or 2 may have accused me of being a liar once or twice :oops:

Actually, I did mean to say Zach played more minutes at SG than PG last year because that was my perception based on all the minutes he played there late in the year. But basketball-reference says he has played 94% of his minutes at PG both seasons. I don't know if that makes me mendacious, but if basketball-reference is correct, it makes that part of my statement incorrect.

I don't think that takes anything away from my main point though...that Zach has shown significant improvement over last year, and that we need to give this kid time to grow into his role. Here are his comparative stats from basketball-reference.com:

http://www.basketball-reference.com/players/l/lavinza01.html

Zach's current year stats are much improved over last year...17.9 points and 6.9 assists per 36 compared to 14.7 and 5.2 last year. Who knows if he can keep it up, but if he makes the same kind of improvement the next two years, we will have a 22-year-old PG with nice stats. PER has increased from a rookie 11.3 to a respectable 14.1 (I would guess that is close to the league average for backup PG's), and almost all other advanced stats show improvement. His TO percentage is up slightly, but one 8 TO game will do that to a guy 8 games into a season. But his defensive rating has improved 10 points, despite spending a lot of his time on the court with Martin, Bazz and Gorgui.

Maybe it's just me, but I'm happy with a raw 20-year-old kid putting up 17.9 and 6.9 per 36 with a defensive rating of 104. I'm looking forward to see those numbers continue to improve as Zach gets more and more comfortable with a position he is still learning. That's why I hope Sam stays the course.



I want to refute so much about what you wrote... because I can see how LaVine gets his points for himself... but don't see how he helps others...

But if we're just going by stats (good or bad, dangerous or not)... you're right -- 18 ppg / 7 ast / Per 36 is not bad at all for a 20-year-old off the bench.

In fact, take only those stats and it's pretty damn solid.
Post Reply