PorkChop wrote:longstrangetrip wrote:PorkChop wrote:
Durant goes down, they have Westbrook and Ibaka. Rubio goes down and there's Pek and Martin. Certainly u see the difference . Ricky healthy and this team is maybe a .500 ball club. Those guys stay healthy and their vying for a championship. I can't agree with that comparison.
And when I say maybe I mean it's never happened before.
I'm not talking about the supporting cast, only the impact an individual player has on his team. And win/loss record depending on whether a player is in the lineup or not is the ultimate way to measure that, And I'll challenge anyone to name a team that falls apart as much as the Wolves do when Rubio is out. That's how I define valuable.
When the supporting cast around u is that bad than its easier to make a difference.
By your logic Bradley Beal is the most important player to his team in the league.
I don't think you are getting it. A players value to their team is reduced the better the other players on the team are. When Lebron was in Cleveland by himself he was the most valuable player in the league hands down. Now he has a lot more help so his value isn't as high as it once was. Most valuable does not translate into best player. That's what always pissed me off about the MVP awards b/c half the time they give it to the best player even when they aren't the most valuable to their team. Look at KG back in the day. He should have had 3-4 MVPs easily b/c he did so much for the team.