Offical Free Agency Thread

Any And All Things T-Wolves Related
User avatar
bleedspeed
Posts: 8161
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Offical Free Agency Thread

Post by bleedspeed »

1M a year would be fine by me.
User avatar
khans2k5 [enjin:6608728]
Posts: 6414
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Offical Free Agency Thread

Post by khans2k5 [enjin:6608728] »

That has to signal the end of the JJ era right? I don't see how they could play together defensively.
User avatar
alexftbl8181 [enjin:6648741]
Posts: 1957
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Offical Free Agency Thread

Post by alexftbl8181 [enjin:6648741] »

he wasn't bad at all last year by any means. Vet min would be like 1.5

I'm gonna say its a 2 year 5 mil deal
User avatar
Camden [enjin:6601484]
Posts: 18065
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Offical Free Agency Thread

Post by Camden [enjin:6601484] »

khans2k5 wrote:That has to signal the end of the JJ era right? I don't see how they could play together defensively.


Yep. JJ's gone. Likely will be involved in a three team deal with CLE and PHI or in a separate trade with just PHI.
User avatar
alexftbl8181 [enjin:6648741]
Posts: 1957
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Offical Free Agency Thread

Post by alexftbl8181 [enjin:6648741] »

khans2k5 wrote:That has to signal the end of the JJ era right? I don't see how they could play together defensively.


Mo would be the 15th guy with a guaranteed deal. I'm guessing GR3 either gets traded or doesn't make the team
User avatar
Camden [enjin:6601484]
Posts: 18065
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Offical Free Agency Thread

Post by Camden [enjin:6601484] »

One year, $3.75M for Mo Williams. I can live with that. Wish it was less, though.
User avatar
alexftbl8181 [enjin:6648741]
Posts: 1957
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Offical Free Agency Thread

Post by alexftbl8181 [enjin:6648741] »

Camden wrote:One year, $3.75M for Mo Williams. I can live with that. Wish it was less, though.


can't really complain about amounts for a one year deal. It's not like it's gonna hinder anything in the future
User avatar
zigzag22 [enjin:6591633]
Posts: 174
Joined: Mon Jul 08, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Offical Free Agency Thread

Post by zigzag22 [enjin:6591633] »

Honestly, a one year deal is a home run. He's not perfect, but he will play well alongside LaVine (allowing LaVine to slide into the SG position). Plus, its a ONE YEAR deal! When's the last time our FO signed a solid role player to a respectable, good value deal?
User avatar
Camden [enjin:6601484]
Posts: 18065
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Offical Free Agency Thread

Post by Camden [enjin:6601484] »

alexftbl8181 wrote:
Camden wrote:One year, $3.75M for Mo Williams. I can live with that. Wish it was less, though.


can't really complain about amounts for a one year deal. It's not like it's gonna hinder anything in the future


I know it, but I'd still like to add Blatche to play backup PF and we might not have enough money to throw at him.
User avatar
alexftbl8181 [enjin:6648741]
Posts: 1957
Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 12:00 am

Re: Offical Free Agency Thread

Post by alexftbl8181 [enjin:6648741] »

Camden wrote:
alexftbl8181 wrote:
Camden wrote:One year, $3.75M for Mo Williams. I can live with that. Wish it was less, though.


can't really complain about amounts for a one year deal. It's not like it's gonna hinder anything in the future


I know it, but I'd still like to add Blatche to play backup PF and we might not have enough money to throw at him.


Wolves have to make a deal before signing anybody else though. they have 15 guys with deals now, not including GR3
Post Reply