PorkChop wrote:Let's just hope Lavine doesn't turn into David Oriz 2.0!
He does have that home run ball
CoolBreeze44 wrote:
khans2k5 wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:
khans2k5 wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:
khans2k5 wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:
khans2k5 wrote:
CoolBreeze44 wrote:Wait, we didn't get Butler for just Dunn and #7? Bloop? Kahns?
We also got 16 back Nostradamus. Didn't see you call that one. Changes the equation of the trade.
You're never wrong.
Apparently neither are you. Had that post already locked and loaded the second you got home didn't you?
I should say you're never wropng, even when you are.
Probably shouldn't call someone out for being wrong when you weren't right either.
I was totally right. Get a clue.
What the fuck were you right about? We got Butler and a first round pick for what you thought it would take to just get Butler. Delusional. Get your trash out of here.
You are unbelievable. I DIDNT SAY WHAT IT WOULD TAKE TO GET BUTLER. All I said is it was going to take more than Dunn and #7. Guess what, it did.
I still don't know what to think of this one. I really hate seeing Lavine go. We have a very good starting 5 now, great, but we have an even weaker bench now and who is going to shoot the 3? We'll have to see what they can bring in during free agency.
TheGrey08 wrote:*POOF* Out from under a rock some place I come...
I still don't know what to think of this one. I really hate seeing Lavine go. We have a very good starting 5 now, great, but we have an even weaker bench now and who is going to shoot the 3? We'll have to see what they can bring in during free agency.
True, though Thibs doesn't like playing bench guys anyway :)
TheGrey08 wrote:*POOF* Out from under a rock some place I come...
I still don't know what to think of this one. I really hate seeing Lavine go. We have a very good starting 5 now, great, but we have an even weaker bench now and who is going to shoot the 3? We'll have to see what they can bring in during free agency.
True, though Thibs doesn't like playing bench guys anyway :)
Yeah with any luck, we'll look like the Cavs. Top notch starting 5 and no bench. :d
thedoper wrote:Just finding out now but....yes yes yes!!!!!!!!!! Go Wolves!!
That's the bold move you've been looking for.
I like Butler a lot, but on paper he's actually a better fit with LaVine. But if Wiggins can keep improving his stroke and up the defense a bit, that's a pretty interchangeable wing pairing.
A tweet just made me realize another great aspect of this trade:
Zach is eligible for an extension this offseason. He IS going to get paid. So although we absorb Butler's salary, we don't have Zach to pay any more. Smart, smart move by Thibs and company.
