longstrangetrip wrote:BloopOracle wrote:Carlos Danger wrote:BloopOracle wrote:
Yeah thats a bunch of crap to think we accomplished nothing. Thibs forced our core players to put everything on their backs, they both grew up quite a bit. Just because our shit supporting cast let them down doesn't mean the players that for sure will be here didn't grow. Claiming we accomplished nothing and that it was a wasted season is what sounds delusional to me. But hey I guess we could hire our 4th coach in 4 years and act shocked once again that they couldn't instantly make the Wolves a winner.
The following is a list of all of Thibs accomplishments after year one:
.
Where is Towns development of passing out of double teams?
Where is Wiggins being forced to initiate the offense more?
Where is Belly's improved play before he went down?
Where is Rubio's developing ability to keep defenses honest for the first time in his career after Thibs got on him over and over?
Where is the mention of the Wolves playing best defense in the NBA for over a month?
Good discussion here about Thibs. I clearly side with the guys who think he had a bad year...I didn't love the hire, and he even fell short of my expectations. But I will give him credit for a few things:
1) the emergence of Ricky Rubio
2) Belly becoming closer to the player he was in Europe
3) Some improvement in Bazz's defense, although I didn't like Thibs moving away from him the last quarter of the year.
4) Better media relations than Sam
But these minor accomplishments were far overshadowed by a plethora of bad decisions. He will be back next for sure, but I don't see this team changing much unless Thibs changes first.
I wasn't a huge fan of Thibs either. I warmed up to the idea of him coaching here (no choice in the matter), have defended him, but I do have my questions about his style.
I have no doubt that he is excellent at his craft. A true X's and O's guy. Beyond his craft, he doesn't strike me as a compatible person. No wife, no kids, movies by himself. Basketball is everything. I see zero charisma from him. I can picture Popovich, Stevens, Spoelstra, (Even Sam Mitchell) etc. being able to go to dinner with their respective players and forgetting about basketball for that moment - creating a family aspect. I cannot envision that with Thibs. 100% basketball all the time. Viewing his players as puzzle pieces only. That is why I think he wore out his welcome in Chicago with previous players. "Great coach, but far too serious" is what you see in many quotes from Rose, Noah, etc.
His approach to the game, and life, are perfect for a team of 28-34 year old veterans who's big goal is a championship. Guy's that have a family, know their role in the game and their own life. I do question if his approach is the correct style for a core of 19-23 year old kids who still are carving out their roles in the game and in life.