Page 7 of 94

Re: The Love-Wiggins Deal Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 11:09 am
by longstrangetrip [enjin:6600564]
AbeVigodaLive wrote:The rumored trade I posted wasn't in any way posted as a feasible option.

It was to show you just how much speculation remains. And how wide it is.

That trade is ridiculous. And many would claim the other trade with Waiters included may be just as ridiculous.


I can only assume that rumor came from a Cavs' homer who doesn't understand how NBA salaries work in a trade. He undervalues Love as much as the homers on this board overvalue Love!

Re: The Love-Wiggins Deal Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 11:09 am
by Camden [enjin:6601484]
What's pissed me off the most is getting into arguments/debates with non-Wolves fans about this matter. People saying Flip misplayed this and that. Some still say Love should have been dealt at the draft. People saying we have no leverage and should trade him for whatever we can get. It's tiring to argue with so many idiots.

Re: The Love-Wiggins Deal Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 11:22 am
by TheGrey08
CoolBreeze44 wrote:I don't understand the valuation put on Shabazz. Let him go as far as I'm concerned. We absolutely must keep Lavine and Dieng.

Agreed, but if we're giving away even 1 young asset we better be getting at least 4 young assets in return (3 players 1 pick, etc)

Re: The Love-Wiggins Deal Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 11:32 am
by TheGrey08
longstrangetrip wrote:
I can only assume that rumor came from a Cavs' homer who doesn't understand how NBA salaries work in a trade. He undervalues Love as much as the homers on this board overvalue Love!

I really don't see much if any overvaluing of Love on this board. Most are talking about his TRUE value (top 5-10 player in his early prime) and not this BS trade value where teams think they can get someone for 25 cents on the dollar.

Re: The Love-Wiggins Deal Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 11:41 am
by alexftbl8181 [enjin:6648741]
If I were the Cavs I would be pushing for Brewer. He's going to give you exactly what Wiggins will for at least the next 2 and would be awesome running the fast break with Lebron and Love

Re: The Love-Wiggins Deal Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 11:46 am
by TheGrey08
Jon Krawczynski @APkrawczynski
Andrew Wiggins has not been offered for Kevin Love. Klay Thompson has not been offered for Kevin Love. This is where things stand.

Re: The Love-Wiggins Deal Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 11:50 am
by alexftbl8181 [enjin:6648741]
Seriously can we stop talking about the Warriors? Either they have their head so far up their ass they think Klay is worth more then Love, or they're playing the dumbest game of hardball ever

Re: The Love-Wiggins Deal Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 11:51 am
by Monster
alexftbl8181 wrote:If I were the Cavs I would be pushing for Brewer. He's going to give you exactly what Wiggins will for at least the next 2 and would be awesome running the fast break with Lebron and Love


If I remember right the mysterious magical T-spence said the cavs wanted Brewer and the Wolves were willing to put him in the deal but they couldn't make salaries work.

Its kinda fun to see if any of these random people are right with there reports. The Media game is totally changing. You don't have to be employed by anyone all you need is some device and some wifi and you can do almost anything on some level as any news or media empire with more rudimentary finishing touches obviously and fewer resources. Of course there are fewer limitations on what you can do also. Its an interesting time and there are no shortage of people eating up whatever stuff they can get their hands on both consumers and people trying to give people info.

Re: The Love-Wiggins Deal Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 11:52 am
by alexftbl8181 [enjin:6648741]
Love/Brew for Wiggins/Thompson/Waiters/Haywood and a 1st

Fair for everybody

Re: The Love-Wiggins Deal Thread

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2014 11:54 am
by TheGrey08
My question is do the Cavs have any room/exceptions left that would allow them to do a S&T for someone we could use? If that's even possible.