Re: And your starting PF for the 26-27 Minnesota TimberWolves is?
Posted: Tue Jul 28, 2026 12:16 pm
Again why are we talking about Ant playing PF? I'm sure there will be times that he is matched up against opposing 4s but likely not when they have a significant height advantage.FNG wrote: ↑Tue Jul 28, 2026 10:28 amMonster, I'm not sure what's inaccurate in my assessment...Ant's documented 8-4 standing reach clearly puts him at a disadvantage when having to defend PFs 8 inches longer than him (9 feet being close to the average PF length...some longer, some shorter). This one is personal to me. Even though it was decades ago, I still remember my first college game against the Coast Guard Academy. We mostly matched up with them size wise, except for me...I had to guard a guy who both outweighed me by 50 pounds (Hi Jaden), and had at least 8 inches of true length on me (Hi Ant et al). Let's just say it wasn't pretty and I'm still carrying the emotional scars...I had no chance against him! That's why I'm so adamant about not playing guys like Ant and Jaden away from their natural positions. Dane Moore has said we're not a "serious team" if we're thinking we can put Jaden or Ant/Ayo at PF and get away with it most nights, and I agree. That's why I'm convinced TC is still going to make a move. It may not be right away because I don't think we have assets that are attractive enough. But if the mix and match strategy doesn't work and Lyles doesn't at least partially solve the PF issue (and yes, five other teams have not considered him a starter), I wouldn't be surprised to see a mid-December trade when a bona fide attractive asset in Ayo becomes trade eligible. We'll have to see, but in TC I trust.Monster wrote: ↑Tue Jul 28, 2026 7:50 amFNG saying Edwards has short arms is hilarious because it's clearly not accurate. Meanwhile most of defense isn't standing straight up and down and are we not going to account for Edwards well above average athletic ability when contesting shots? Like someone said Edwards playing PF is something that is gonna happen situationally not every game. Thank goodness we didn't acquire Zion Williamson and his short armed 8'7" standing reach!AussieWolf3 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 28, 2026 7:22 am
Lyles ain't starting, and if he is I'd be very disappointed in Finch.
I agreed that he's becoming a forgotten player in the PF discussion, but that's still only as a rotation piece, he can't be a starter for an indefinite period of games--- that would be a problem.
Talking about Ant or Ayo playing PF is ridiculous, because that's not the question at hand. The question is, can they be good enough as wing stoppers if Jaden is your starting PF?
And once again we're left asking: who are these "behemoths" playing PF in the league today? Chet Holmgren is considered a DPOY level defender who is the starting 4 in OKCs lineup and then moves down to center when IHart leaves the floor.... How bulky is that guy?
You'll have to solve for guys like Zion, who you won't see in the playoffs and Giannis who plays in the East. That puzzle is never solved, by any team, by matching your 4s 1 on 1 with them...never
Whether this board or Finch like it or not Jaden is the starting PF unless other moves are made.
But monster brings up a good point when he mentions Zion, because Zion is also somewhat under-lengthed (to make up a word) as a PF at 8-7. I would have no problem at all with Ant guarding Zion when we play the Pels only giving up 3 inches in length. But even though I also remember him having some good possessions against JJJ in the past, I think it's folly to think he can guard a guy like that on most nights giving up 10 inches in length! Ant might be bulky enough to keep him away from the basket (unlike Jaden), but Jackson could take mid-rangers and floaters with impunity. I hope Finchy doesn't do that to either Ant or Jaden.
Jaden is also, almost certainly, heavier than his combine weight of 189. I continue to be so confused by this conversation.
It's not that it's much ado about nothing, but it's close. I also don't agree with Dane on his point, and it's a serious exaggeration in my opinion